NUFC Transfer Rumours

[Ronaldo]

24 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

Solanke's far more mobile than Wilson these days, but Wilson is a proven finisher. Not sure Solanke is yet.

 
On course to score more goals than Wilson ever has in the PL to be fair. He’s a better player. 

[Mikky]

Jonathan David for me like (Sesko is my number one choice but David is canny)

 

 

[TRon]

43 minutes ago, Ronaldo said:

 
On course to score more goals than Wilson ever has in the PL to be fair. He’s a better player. 

 

He looks a better all round player for sure. But is he a one season wonder? Wilson whatever else his failings, you know for a fact if he's fit for the majority of a season he scores goals, every season.

[STM]

I really like the look of Solanke. He's got similar attributes to Toney and I think there's room for improvement.

 

In terms of price. What's he going to set is back? 50m? While some might turn their noses up, that's standard fare for a good PL striker.

 

Ultimately, I believe in the TEAM but the team can't function if some of its players are made of paper.

[SUPERTOON]

1 minute ago, STM said:

I really like the look of Solanke. He's got similar attributes to Toney and I think there's room for improvement.

 

In terms of price. What's he going to set is back? 50m? While some might turn their noses up, that's standard fare for a good PL striker.

 

Ultimately, I believe in the TEAM but the team can't function if some of its players are made of paper.

60 million was the price quoted in January. 

[Mikky]

2 minutes ago, STM said:

I really like the look of Solanke. He's got similar attributes to Toney and I think there's room for improvement.

 

In terms of price. What's he going to set is back? 50m? While some might turn their noses up, that's standard fare for a good PL striker.

 

Ultimately, I believe in the TEAM but the team can't function if some of its players are made of paper.

Solanke is a good player - sadly the Snglish tax means he is out of reach

 

FWIW I think we will go abroad 

J David 

Sesko

Gimenez

Zirkee

Gudmundsson

 

[r0cafella]

4 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

60 million was the price quoted in January. 

Hard pass at 60m. Not because he’s bad or anything it’s just way too much money for a guy who’s already 26 and has no experience playing at European level. 

[The Prophet]

While I see what Howe is trying to do, I still like the idea of a defensive midfielder, even if just to bring on late on or to change shape. 

[SUPERTOON]

1 minute ago, r0cafella said:

Hard pass at 60m. Not because he’s bad or anything it’s just way too much money for a guy who’s already 26 and has no experience playing at European level. 

Agree, from the bits I’ve seen, Sesko would be perfect. Probably similar price as well although I think he will have better offers.

[Mikky]

4 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

While I see what Howe is trying to do, I still like the idea of a defensive midfielder, even if just to bring on late on or to change shape. 

Ideally someone who can retain and pass the ball - a lot of our issues with the back 5 stem from us losing the ball 

[madras]

3 minutes ago, Mikky said:

Ideally someone who can retain and pass the ball - a lot of our issues with the back 5 stem from us losing the ball 

A lot of it comes from not closing off the passing channels which we were so good at last season. That's Willock and Joelinton out and Longstaff having to play on the left for  bit and having to try and nurse forwards through the game.

[SUPERTOON]

11 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

While I see what Howe is trying to do, I still like the idea of a defensive midfielder, even if just to bring on late on or to change shape. 

Agree, don’t think we sign a midfielder though unless we sell one.

[Decky]

We need a fairly decent overhaul in the summer because its clear as day now that our squad is really weak. There is obvious deadwood like Fraser who need to be moved on but we probably need to shift some players who are around the first team too. Wilson and Almiron are the two obvious candidates at the minute, Joelinton as well if he doesn't sign a new deal. 

 

With our budget and the added value from players sales we should be looking to get about 3 first-teamers and a few fringe players for rotation who are better than what we have now. We obviously need a RW, LB, CB, a new striker if Wilson goes and at least 2 new central midfielders depending who who leaves the club in that position, so there's a lot of work to get done. 

[rebelrouser]

On 18/02/2024 at 09:51, Decky said:

RW, LB, CB

LB: Dan Burn January 31, 2022, Matt Targett July 1, 2022, Tino Livramento (more of a rb tbf) August 8, 2023, Lewis Hall August 22, 2023.  

[duo]

 

[timeEd32]

I'd give no more than a cameo to both. 

[relámpago blanco]

5 minutes ago, timeEd32 said:

I'd give no more than a cameo to both. 

No more than 5-10 mins for either. 

 

Happy to lose as them 2 back and fit will impact our season massively.  I'd like them to come back slow but stay fit.

 

They won't though, they might not start against Arsenal but you can guarantee they will have a lot of minutes quickly 

[TheBrownBottle]

On 19/02/2024 at 01:51, Decky said:

We need a fairly decent overhaul in the summer because its clear as day now that our squad is really weak. There is obvious deadwood like Fraser who need to be moved on but we probably need to shift some players who are around the first team too. Wilson and Almiron are the two obvious candidates at the minute, Joelinton as well if he doesn't sign a new deal. 

 

With our budget and the added value from players sales we should be looking to get about 3 first-teamers and a few fringe players for rotation who are better than what we have now. We obviously need a RW, LB, CB, a new striker if Wilson goes and at least 2 new central midfielders depending who who leaves the club in that position, so there's a lot of work to get done. 

How many left backs do we need?   

[Decky]

41 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

How many left backs do we need?   

Can only assume we’re backing out of the Hall deal. If we’re not it’s truly bizarre why he isn’t being given time on the field. Targett isn’t really good enough. He’s decent like but if we have a new lb I don’t see the value in having both him and Burn at the club. Burn being able to cover at centre back as well puts him above Targett. Tino is filling a hole there when we see him, ideally next season he’d be rotating with Trippier. 
 

@rebelrouser was gonna reply to you too but this covers both replies.

 

 

Edited February 20, 2024 by Decky

[huss9]

1 hour ago, timeEd32 said:

I'd give no more than a cameo to both. 

i feel blackburn is the more important game.

[TheBrownBottle]

7 hours ago, huss9 said:

i feel blackburn is the more important game.

Yep.  I’d happily see a reserve side vs Arsenal to ensure full fitness for Blackburn (other opinions do exist, though)

[Ikon]

If they just started to train like normally then Arsenal feels too soon. Even for cameos. 

[Menace]

12 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Yep.  I’d happily see a reserve side vs Arsenal to ensure full fitness for Blackburn (other opinions do exist, though)

 

I've paid almost £200 for the pleasure - so no thanks! I don't want to see Ritchie and Dummett play.

[Guest]

9 minutes ago, Menace said:

 

I've paid almost £200 for the pleasure - so no thanks! I don't want to see Ritchie and Dummett play.

 

If the offset is it gets you to Wembley in a couple of months time, I'm sure you'll survive. 

[SteV]

21 minutes ago, Ikon said:

If they just started to train like normally then Arsenal feels too soon. Even for cameos. 

For Willock maybe, but not for Isak. He’s only been out three weeks, so he should be good to go. 
 

From what Eddie said at last week’s presser you felt that if Bournemouth had been a huge game for whatever reason, Isak probably could have been risked. Think they took the safe option last week, so now’s the right time.

 

Reckon Isak starts* and Willock is on the bench.

 

*although that doesn’t mean he has to run himself into the ground for 98 mins.