NUFC Transfer Rumours

[SUPERTOON]

2 minutes ago, PRL said:

Didn’t we get linked with Quansah as part of any Gordon deal and the scousers were adamant he was some kind of ‘generational talent’ (Steve Parish TM) and wouldn’t be leaving them any time soon? Has he had that bad a season?

He is understandably behind VVD and Konate in the pecking order, however Gomez was also favoured over him before he got injured.

[SteV]

20 minutes ago, Nucasol said:

Party boy?

Bit close to going down the Adam Johnson route if his leaked Insta messages are to be believed.

[1964]

8 hours ago, Jewel said:

 

Not convinced by Dibling at all. Because he is so young, people naturally assume his potential is limitless, but it could just as easily mean he's hit his ceiling very early in his career. 

 

Personally, I think he'll have a career similar to that of Connor Wickham.

Like Crouch, he hit his ceiling early.....

[SUPERTOON]

 

[ExiledGeordie]

Huijsen would cost too much I think considering we want a high calibre RW too. 

[LFEE]

5 hours ago, et tu brute said:

Last season I agree, but I just don't understand why all 3 were given extensions/new contracts to avoid the current situation. If all three go for nothing, that is arguably their three best players, which will need replacing and no incoming money to assist with their replacements. I know Liverpool are very much ok with PSR, but surely that's going to take a hit this summer, if all the three leave. I realise it's hypothetical, as Van Dijk and Salah may well sign new deals.

What’s difficult to understand? They’ve been constantly in discussions about new contracts but none of the players want to sign what’s being offered to them as they can get bigger wages plus a massive signing on fee elsewhere. Club are helpless in that scenario. 
 

Can see it happening more and more. Chelsea ahead of the game on this with 7-9yr contracts but the risk you take with their approach is player motivation and injuries. 
 

It’s always a fine balancing act. 

[La Parka]

He's a fucking wank right back. 

 

Actually is a unit though. 

 

Stats look very good. He'd replace fab id imagine ?

 

He'd be a great buy imo. 

 

Don't think he'll go if vvd goes. 

 

 

 

 

Edited Thursday at 09:14 by La Parka

[gjohnson]

17 minutes ago, LFEE said:

What’s difficult to understand? They’ve been constantly in discussions about new contracts but none of the players want to sign what’s being offered to them as they can get bigger wages plus a massive signing on fee elsewhere. Club are helpless in that scenario. 
 

Can see it happening more and more. Chelsea ahead of the game on this with 7-9yr contracts but the risk you take with their approach is player motivation and injuries. 
 

It’s always a fine balancing act. 

Chelsea's tactic of massively long contracts will seriously bite them if they don't get success in the next few years. Obviously this World Club b***s will help them. Until they figure out how to sell their own players to themselves or find some other way to bend the rules.

 

Alternatively it could completely implode between Boehly and the other lot, and they'll be up the creek without a paddle

[Kimbo]

Quanash has had a shit season and needs a lot of work, I wouldn’t be picking him ahead of Schar, Burn, or Botman any time soon. For the amount he would cost you could get an already developed player abroad.

[andycap]

He's a big lad deceptively quick aswell would rather have him playing for us rather than huijsen we need pace at the back. 

Plus he can slot in at right back if tripps leaves. 

 

 

Edited Thursday at 09:20 by andycap

[La Parka]

5 minutes ago, Kimbo said:

Quanash has had a shit season and needs a lot of work, I wouldn’t be picking him ahead of Schar, Burn, or Botman any time soon. For the amount he would cost you could get an already developed player abroad.

 

Honestly would start ahead of Fab. He's in massive decline. Botman is unknown but fit botman is obviously better. Dan burn is an enigma and offers loads more than you can quantity. 

 

Unless we go full stoke and play:

 

Tino Quansah Botman Burn Hall

 

and terrorise at set pieces 😂 

 

 

 

Edited Thursday at 09:22 by La Parka

[KingArthur]

9 minutes ago, La Parka said:

 

Honestly would start ahead of Fab. He's in massive decline. Botman is unknown but fit botman is obviously better. Dan burn is an enigma and offers loads more than you can quantity. 

 

Unless we go full stoke and play:

 

Tino Quansah Botman Burn Hall

 

and terrorise at set pieces 😂 

 

 

 

 

Wait what? Schär has been decent again this season, and his passing is a great option to have. 

We don't need Quansah at all.

[Kimbo]

9 minutes ago, La Parka said:

 

Honestly would start ahead of Fab. He's in massive decline. Botman is unknown but fit botman is obviously better. Dan burn is an enigma and offers loads more than you can quantity. 

 

Unless we go full stoke and play:

 

Tino Quansah Botman Burn Hall

 

and terrorise at set pieces 😂 

 

 

 

 

Quansah has a bad season though, I don’t think if we’re looking to push for CL next season you put him straight in the starting XI. I think he would need a season to develop.

[J7]

9 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

Wait what? Schär has been decent again this season, and his passing is a great option to have. 

We don't need Quansah at all.

I think it’s fairly obvious Schär has had a drop off this season. He was great in the cup final, but he’s having more bad performances than he was having over the past couple seasons. He’s hitting his mid-30s, so it’s hardly a surprise tbh. We’ve got one of the oldest starting 11s in the league and waiting until performances fall off a cliff isn’t an option.

 

 

Edited Thursday at 09:40 by J7

[The Prophet]

10 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

Wait what? Schär has been decent again this season, and his passing is a great option to have. 

We don't need Quansah at all.

 

Schar hasn't had a great season by his usual high standards.

[JP]

We can't be daft enough to buy a homegrown from Liverpool to significantly strengthen their PSR position (Isak). 

 

 

[black_n_white]

Still think a right sided center back will be higher priory than right winger, Guehi and Elanga were the targets last summer so let’s see what happens.

[GEFAFWISP]

Fuck giving Liverpool anything. Quansah ain't it, no value in buying him from them. We have to have learnt our lessons by now given the last three windows of minimal transfer movement (outside panic selling).

 

This shouldn't be a debate frankly.

[SUPERTOON]

 

[kingxlnc]

6 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

 

That would be some coup if so. You can't get a better Wilson replacement. 

 

[r0cafella]

7 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

 

"Early move"

[r0cafella]

1 minute ago, kingxlnc said:

That would be some coup if so. You can't get a better Wilson replacement. 

 

He's not coming here. 

[Newcastle Fan]

I've been saying we should get Jonathan David for at least two years now, he's a perfect fit for our system and can even play on the right if required.

[TRon]

13 hours ago, Bunk Moreland said:

 

Just that we'd offer £30m and think we can tempt him with the promise of game time. Nothing about a swap mentioned.

 

Hardy is mildly reliable but how the fuck would he know these details other than Mitchell ringing him up months before the window opens and telling him precisely what our plan was including how much we plan on paying? It's one thing to know who's on a list of targets - people outside the club like agents can leak that - but there's probably fewer than 5 people at the club who know the precise deal we want to put together and it's in none of their interest to leak such a detailed plan to the press this far in advance of the window.

 

 

It's one of the stupidest links I've read so far this year. It claims Liverpool turned down £50m last summer, but we are now thinking we can get him for £30m even though he's got 4 years of his contract left. As if we would be doing our business through the media in any case even if it were true.

 

Only plausible reason I can think of it being printed is that we are fed up with Liverpool media links with Isak and maybe this is a counter punch to try to unsettle Quansah.

[Sibierski]

People downplaying the English talent again by not wanting Quansah. Just like Trevor Chalobah, there's really good talents for good fees. I'd be happy if we exclusively spent the big money on English talent, because the ceiling is stupidly high.