Andy84 Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 7 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: That Kang player is a Spurs signing. I would prefer Bryan Not even a discussion imo. £ dependant I suppose Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago Meh. He’s tidy, clever and good in tight spaces but I’m not really sure he’s got the physicality or speed to work as a top winger in the prem. Lot of player for 25m though. Would be a decent bit of business and saves some money for other positions. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted 6 hours ago Share Posted 6 hours ago 13 minutes ago, The College Dropout said: That Kang player is a Spurs signing. I would prefer Bryan Do we have £60m to spend on one player? Would mean no CM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumbheed Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago (edited) He's done reasonably well in France, which is physically quite similar to ours and he's techincally at the very highest level. He's a great age, great price and is tried and tested in a team that dominates possession and territory. I'm not sure I'd choose Mbuemo over someone like B. Silva, which is the profile I'd say is most similar to Lee Kang-In, if others say they would, then fair play. Edited 5 hours ago by Thumbheed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesse Pinkman Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Why we not in for De Bruyne, still think he’s an upgrade on Willock and Longstaff for a season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, Jesse Pinkman said: Why we not in for De Bruyne, still think he’s an upgrade on Willock and Longstaff for a season. A gazillion pounds per week? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, Jesse Pinkman said: Why we not in for De Bruyne, still think he’s an upgrade on Willock and Longstaff for a season. Because £350k a week minimum and barely any legs. Other than that, dunno. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, Jesse Pinkman said: Why we not in for De Bruyne, still think he’s an upgrade on Willock and Longstaff for a season. These are exactly the type of signings we should not be making. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiekris Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 hour ago, McCormick said: Meh. He’s tidy, clever and good in tight spaces but I’m not really sure he’s got the physicality or speed to work as a top winger in the prem. Lot of player for 25m though. Would be a decent bit of business and saves some money for other positions. This is what worries me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago Good old the Leeds Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Theregulars Posted 3 hours ago Share Posted 3 hours ago It’s mad how only 4 of them were worth it, including the same player twice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now