Palestoon Posted May 8 Share Posted May 8 4 hours ago, gdm said: How would that help them? The same way selling Anderson for 30 million and buying the Greek keeper for 20 mil helped us avoid PSR trouble. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 (edited) 5 hours ago, Palestoon said: The same way selling Anderson for 30 million and buying the Greek keeper for 20 mil helped us avoid PSR trouble. Yeah but to help them they’d have to make a profit (like we did) Anderson for £30m & Greek keeper reportedly was £20m they made £10m on the deal. How would selling Ramsay at a cut price and Barnes at an inflated fee help then unless they still made a profit. it only worked because the keeper was worth considerably less than Anderson & nowhere near £20m Edited May 9 by gdm Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
High Five o Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 4 minutes ago, gdm said: Yeah but to help them they’d have to make a profit (like we did) Anderson for £30m & Greek keeper reportedly was £20m they made £10m on the deal. How would selling Ramsay at a cut price and Barnes at an inflated fee help then unless they still made a profit. it only worked because the keeper was worth nowhere near £20m If you sell for 20m and buy for 20m the accounting would show profit. 20m sale is accounted for full value. 20 purchase (assuming 5 y contract) is accounted for 4m first year. So in essence a 16m profit first year. 4m negative the next 4 years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 7 minutes ago, gdm said: Yeah but to help them they’d have to make a profit (like we did) Anderson for £30m & Greek keeper reportedly was £20m they made £10m on the deal. How would selling Ramsay at a cut price and Barnes at an inflated fee help then unless they still made a profit. it only worked because the keeper was worth considerably less than Anderson & nowhere near £20m I'm no expert but, iirc, I did see it explained a bit differently to that. £30m for Anderson was "pure profit" = all went on the books £20m for Vlad was all debt BUT amoratised over the leghth of his contract so not 30-20 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 7 minutes ago, High Five o said: If you sell for 20m and buy for 20m the accounting would show profit. 20m sale is accounted for full value. 20 purchase (assuming 5 y contract) is accounted for 4m first year. So in essence a 16m profit first year. 4m negative the next 4 years. A June deal works slightly differently as you only take 1 12th of the annual amortisation so I'm effect get the full £20 million profit this year then £4m cost for the next 5 years Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 6 hours ago, vexred said: Read that Trafford wants £100k a week. I hope we look elsewhere. He’s going to be a starting GK and highly likely the next England number 1 in the early part of that contract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 12 minutes ago, High Five o said: If you sell for 20m and buy for 20m the accounting would show profit. 20m sale is accounted for full value. 20 purchase (assuming 5 y contract) is accounted for 4m first year. So in essence a 16m profit first year. 4m negative the next 4 years. I get you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Guehi for £35m Sell Willock for £25m Ramsey for £40m Sell Barnes for £40m We would get a new CB and Joelinton’s replacement for two bench players. The extra money would go towards a GK and a RW. If Longstaff leaves then we’ll need another CM, hopefully someone young so Miley still gets his minutes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BennyBlanco Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 I think all the talk of selling Barnes is madness. Without his goals and contributions this year we’d be nowhere. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joelinton7 Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 3 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said: I think all the talk of selling Barnes is madness. Without his goals and contributions this year we’d be nowhere. Agreed. People want us in the top Euro comps but then want us to not have a squad to able to actually compete in these comps. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonsays Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 4 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said: I think all the talk of selling Barnes is madness. Without his goals and contributions this year we’d be nowhere. It's mad - seemingly the one area of the pitch we have genuine strength in depth and people want to sacrifice that. The suspension + injury of Gordon could have been a disaster if we didn't have Barnes to step in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Cardigan Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 4 minutes ago, BennyBlanco said: I think all the talk of selling Barnes is madness. Without his goals and contributions this year we’d be nowhere. Agreed. Can’t believe we’re still having this debate tbh. And 40million? For that level of goal involvement? Get out of here! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Swapping Barnes for Ramsey would be insane like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Would definitely take Ramsey to replace Willock. Not Barnes though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Having players like Barnes in depth is why we're talking first about finishing 3rd rather than 7th. We need more like him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Ramsey for Willock would be one of the best upgrades we've ever done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Just now, Yorkie said: Having players like Barnes in depth is why we're talking first about finishing 3rd rather than 7th. We need more like him. We're about to go into a Euro campaign, we're not selling anyone who's played a lot of first team football unless the offer is absolutely insane imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HayDen Traces Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Anyone saying we should replace Barnes with Ramsey is a Villa fan like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Yeah, I want Barnes to stay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 I wouldn't swap Barnes for Ramsey however I'm very relaxed about letting players to who aren't Isak and Tonali. PSR demands sacrifices if your us or Villa as shit as it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
vexred Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 4 hours ago, Sibierski said: He’s going to be a starting GK and highly likely the next England number 1 in the early part of that contract. Pickford is only 31. There is nothing to say he's going to be England No1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 13 minutes ago, vexred said: Pickford is only 31. There is nothing to say he's going to be England No1. I’d suggest the main thing that says he is, is his ability. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 14 hours ago, STM said: Doesnt have to be. Finding a left winger to play as back up to Gordon isn't going to be so difficult, where as Ramsey as an upgrade to Willock might be the exact target Howe wants. Getting one as good as Barnes who will come to sit on the bench would be like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Eddie Howe: "I don't know the intricacies of our financial position depending on Champions League qualification. I don't think it changes too much, in terms of our targets and who we look to try and sign, just because we're trying to go for the best players in a very small pool of players to pick from. "Obviously, I think it's where we want to be, that's where we want to play, we want to be in the highest level competitions we can. We want to test ourselves to the absolute maximum and try and recreate those great nights here." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted May 9 Share Posted May 9 Just now, KaKa said: Eddie Howe: "I don't know the intricacies of our financial position depending on Champions League qualification. I don't think it changes too much, in terms of our targets and who we look to try and sign, just because we're trying to go for the best players in a very small pool of players to pick from. "Obviously, I think it's where we want to be, that's where we want to play, we want to be in the highest level competitions we can. We want to test ourselves to the absolute maximum and try and recreate those great nights here." Still have nightmares over the small pool of players quotes from last summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now