Away Toon Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 If I was Hall I'd be looking at making sure he's not with us next season. He's not been treated very well at all. If he can't get a game this season there is even less chance of him getting on the pitch going forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazarus Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 I dont think howe would be keeping him benched without good reason. What that reason might be Ive no idea. Bad training attitude, poor tactical understanding, unsettled in the area, ashworth power play - could literally be anything. Kids obviously got talent but maybe hes not quite as far along as Miley was/is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted February 29 Share Posted February 29 TRUST that's why ?. While Longstaff walks around the pitch leaving runners left right and centre Howe trusts longy fuck knows why. Hall has never been giving a chance and never will. while Eddie was playing the same eleven week in week out playing on fumes and getting a good pasting he couldn't even get a game what chance has he when our full squad is fit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cf Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 10 hours ago, Away Toon said: If I was Hall I'd be looking at making sure he's not with us next season. He's not been treated very well at all. If he can't get a game this season there is even less chance of him getting on the pitch going forward. We don't know that. Hall may know exactly what the situation is and be happy with it and putting the work in in training for all we know. We're probably not going to find out one way or the other until the end of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingxlnc Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Wouldn’t mind Hall replacing Longstaff in the middle at this point. Hall Bruno Willock Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Is Hall athletic? i don't think he's particularly tall or fast. from the little I've seen of him, he looks a technician first and foremost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanji Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Could use another technician Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 Who makes an appearance first? Hall or Kate Middleton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 7 hours ago, The College Dropout said: Is Hall athletic? More athletic than Bruno. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted March 1 Share Posted March 1 7 hours ago, The College Dropout said: Is Hall athletic? i don't think he's particularly tall or fast. from the little I've seen of him, he looks a technician first and foremost. Seems nippy, not lightning but quicker than the three buggers in the middle at the moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 19 hours ago, TBG said: Who makes an appearance first? Hall or Kate Middleton. Out very own Newcastle Online Liz Truss v the lettuce competition. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed210 Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 12 hours ago, Sibierski said: More athletic than Bruno. my granny is more athletic than Bruno. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 This may well be rubbish but thought I’d post it anyways Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 Worrying Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 Can anyone tell me why he didn't get any game time today Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 This thread will be bumped until the end of time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 I'm going to cling onto hope the tweet above is correct (or something similar). Hall understands the situation, happy, developing on the ground and Howe sees where he's position will be long term. And this is just a short term 'pain' for long term gain. Otherwise, why have him involved at all in around first team squad? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joelinton7 Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 We’re gonna’ sign him, he’s gonna’ come back next season and absolutely nail it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tgarve Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 4 minutes ago, Sibierski said: I'm going to cling onto hope the tweet above is correct (or something similar). Hall understands the situation, happy, developing on the ground and Howe sees where he's position will be long term. And this is just a short term 'pain' for long term gain. Otherwise, why have him involved at all in around first team squad? But then weirdly has played 5,9,12,6,7 minutes the last few times he’s played… which doesn’t add up if this is correct Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 15 minutes ago, Menace said: Can anyone tell me why he didn't get any game time today I don't think there's any mystery - nobody plays left back ahead of Dan Burn. Targett doesn't, Livramento doesn't, Hall doesn't. It's far less to do with Hall than it is with Burn, IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 3 hours ago, SUPERTOON said: This may well be rubbish but thought I’d post it anyways Have they not just quoted some random proposing a change to valuing of home grown players for FFP purposes? Not what the actual rules are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Jow Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 It’s fairly clear at this stage the trigger is appearance or minute based and we’ve got no intention of triggering it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 1 minute ago, Big Jow said: It’s fairly clear at this stage the trigger is appearance or minute based and we’ve got no intention of triggering it. I’m not sure it’s clear at all tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoSelecta Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 The only thing that’s clear to me is how unclear the whole thing is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon1892 Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 7 minutes ago, Big Jow said: It’s fairly clear at this stage the trigger is appearance or minute based and we’ve got no intention of triggering it. Agree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now