Terrymac1966 Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 A couple of loans would bolster things Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 If the club were to come out and say hey, supporters, we know teams need fresh blood, but we have a unified belief that we’re in a really good position and it’s far better in this day in age to make the right signings vs just any signings and we truly thought we were after the right ones — so don’t take this as stagnation, take it as a step in a well considered plan forward that we all agree with. We’ll, I’m not sure I’d 100% buy it, but you could at least say okay, well, let’s go ahead and prove it on the pitch. Not sure we’ll get anything like that, though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 2 minutes ago, B-more Mag said: If the club were to come out and say hey, supporters, we know teams need fresh blood, but we have a unified belief that we’re in a really good position and it’s far better in this day in age to make the right signings vs just any signings and we truly thought we were after the right ones — so don’t take this as stagnation, take it as a step in a well considered plan forward that we all agree with. We’ll, I’m not sure I’d 100% buy it, but you could at least say okay, well, let’s go ahead and prove it on the pitch. Not sure we’ll get anything like that, though. With Amanda gone we won't get anything, Eales will probably speak in November or something Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 10 minutes ago, B-more Mag said: If the club were to come out and say hey, supporters, we know teams need fresh blood, but we have a unified belief that we’re in a really good position and it’s far better in this day in age to make the right signings vs just any signings and we truly thought we were after the right ones — so don’t take this as stagnation, take it as a step in a well considered plan forward that we all agree with. We’ll, I’m not sure I’d 100% buy it, but you could at least say okay, well, let’s go ahead and prove it on the pitch. Not sure we’ll get anything like that, though. I wouldn't say we're necessarily owed that explanation but if that is the case then I would absolutely accept it. In fact I'd actually admire it and it would fire me up no end when it comes to hoping for a good season. I love the team we've got already. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 Think it’s about time we closed this thread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 Just now, nufcnick said: Think it’s about time we closed this thread 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
christ Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 23 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: I wish you had any evidence for this. Even if there is a change in the organisation and a difference in approaches, they’re both professionals and I would hope it’ll be resolved and come up with a joint shortlist for the future. That’s how most clubs work. I don’t think it’s a secret that Howe likes to have a lot of control over things. I also think it was made pretty clear by him at the time that the Mitchell appointment wasn’t welcome news. It would be very weird for us to pursue a defender for that much money (and who we’re unlikely to be able to attract after this window IMO) and not have a back up in mind in case the deal didn’t come off. If that’s what happens then we can only assume the direction is being given by the manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 3 minutes ago, nufcnick said: Think it’s about time we closed this thread Marc Geu-who, tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny Green Balls Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 3 minutes ago, christ said: I don’t think it’s a secret that Howe likes to have a lot of control over things. I also think it was made pretty clear by him at the time that the Mitchell appointment wasn’t welcome news. It would be very weird for us to pursue a defender for that much money (and who we’re unlikely to be able to attract after this window IMO) and not have a back up in mind in case the deal didn’t come off. If that’s what happens then we can only assume the direction is being given by the manager. Can we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
huss9 Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 1 hour ago, Jack27 said: if thats the case, i hope he has the balls to ask Eddie about it in the next presser. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amir_9 Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 2 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Honestly the last time someone led someone on like this was the first time any fella fancied someone that had zero interest back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 2 minutes ago, The Prophet said: That's not as interesting as 🧨 TENSIONS RISE, mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
christ Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 7 minutes ago, Vinny Green Balls said: Can we? We’re not signing anyone that manager doesn’t want. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagMal Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 So have we signed him yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vinny Green Balls Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 Just now, christ said: We’re not signing anyone that manager doesn’t want. Once again, can we assume that? Are we totally ruling out that he and Mitchell came to an agreement over certain players? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 (edited) If it's true I still think we should just pay the extra £5m like Edited August 29 by Hanshithispantz Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExiledGeordie Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 I still think this is on…….. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 54 minutes ago, LFEE said: I totally get this opinion. However… Would you rather back EH & the current squad during a season without European distractions and get the RCB & RW we WANT next summer without selling Bruno/Isak/Gordon and hope we get top 4-6. Or… Would you want that RCB & RW this summer and have a greater chance of making top 4 and winning a cup you’d think BUT regardless if you do achieve it or you don’t you MUST lose two of Bruno/Isak/Gordon to pay for them albeit 12 months down the line so possibly being even worse off? That is the possible dilemma this window seems to be posing that not enough on here are understanding. Transformative can be achieved in so many ways. Don’t equate it only to spending big this window like most of you are. Well of course in the scenario you presented give me the first option, however that's a very positive spin you are putting on things If the club said we don't have the money and we have to hang fire I would be totally cool with it However, we know the money is there, I just massively disagree that ONLY Marc Guehi is the solution, something or someone is utterly messed up if that's the case. Firstly I don't think he's at that elite level and secondly a club that operates on the basis of only having one target is a badly run club What if Guehi was to get injured today, do we just cease existing as a club? If the money is there and we have failed to buy in an area we need players it's simply negligence, as to who is responsible that I can't say so I'd rather just be critical of the window instead of anyone specific Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 If he has upped the original price, you would have to think that we would have the dignity to twll him to go amd fcuk himself! Who does he think he is! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 Probably clutching, but is there not a chance Parish is just trying to take the piss a little bit further to see how desperate we are. But tomorrow will just say yeah ok I'll take it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATB Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 1 minute ago, Hanshithispantz said: If it's true I still think we should just pay tye extra £5m like Agree. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 12 minutes ago, The Prophet said: At least we can add Palace to the list of clubs we hate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 2 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said: If it's true I still think we should just pay the extra £5m like That's a big if. The usual spouting heads have had that many figures and stories with absolutely nothing confirmed. How much did they want ? Have they changed their terms? Etc. Do you trust Hope, Edwards etc to actually know ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted August 29 Share Posted August 29 If we disnt think he was worth 65 plus add ons why the feck would we pay 70 plus add ons. Bloke is taking the pish Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now