El Prontonise Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago I'm all for players getting the money in football instead of owners but much of it needs redistributing down the leagues etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted 5 hours ago Share Posted 5 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Alberto2005 said: I'd take him for 40m. Was thinking the same. To us he's well worth £35-40m. Liverpool are in a position where if they get him for cheap/free then brilliant, if not, they'll just sign someone better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago Palace would sell to the illustrious Liverpool for much less than they would us. Cucks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
janpawel Posted 4 hours ago Share Posted 4 hours ago He'd be an amazing 3rd choice CB for Liverpool, but surely they also need someone who can be the main man in 2 years max with Van Dijk getting older and Konate maybe leaving Don't think he's good enough to be 'that guy' for a Champions League / Premier League winning team, he's too weak in the air imo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted 39 minutes ago Share Posted 39 minutes ago (edited) 4 hours ago, Holloway said: Premier league players should be alreet We'd have said that about Clark when he was playing too. But not just Premier League players are involved here so where do we draw the line? "It makes sense to run your contract down in the Championship to maximise your pay, but not in the Prem"? Doesn't make any sense. Then what about Ligue 1? La Liga? Eredivisie? What about if a Sunderland player's contract runs out between promotion and relegation again, do they count as Championship or PL? Then you get to not all teams being the same size in each league, so a league rule makes no sense anyway. Plus not all players at any team get the same pay. Basically, you can't draw a line within a continuum without looking silly, especially when the teams making up that continuum aren't static themselves within it. Even pointing out individuals who will 'definitely' be OK like TAA, aside from that being ridiculous as shown above, well why should they have to leave tens of millions on the table out of some altruistic idealism, ceding a massive portion of their value to a multi billion pound corporation? Fuck that. Edited 37 minutes ago by Chris_R Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holloway Posted 30 minutes ago Share Posted 30 minutes ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now