Nicolas Jackson

[Zero]

Just do it. We genuinely have no options left. If we can’t sign him we might need to play Neave. I am serious.

[khay]

Bayern waiting to see if no one else comes in and Chelsea at least accept a loan to help cover his wages by the sounds of it. 

[bobbydazzla]

1 minute ago, Zero said:

Just do it. We genuinely have no options left. If we can’t sign him we might need to play Neave. I am serious.

Chill out man, Vardy got this 

[aussiemag]

Ramos and Jackson? Sell Isak. 

[SUPERTOON]

The Bayern president was pretty brutal in his response to links with Jackson earlier in the window. Unless things have changed, he said they had no interest.

[Gottlob]

Really started to feel with some clarity over the past twenty-four hours or at least since waking up this morning that we should be grabbing Jackson for £50 million and Strand Larsen for £60 million and giving it the old heave ho for this season.

[aussiemag]

I think Jackson with a loan to buy arrangement, gives us the PSR flexibility to not be held hostage over Isak. 

[OverThere]

If this happens I would start him over Isak most of the time until Isak proves to be at least partially "committed"

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Just now, OverThere said:

If this happens I would start him over Isak most of the time until Isak proves to be at least partially "committed"

 

Can't see Isak being ready for several weeks anyway I guess.

[TRon]

We must really want Wissa badly if there's a deal to be done for Jackson that's under £60m and we aren't closing that out. 

[OverThere]

3 minutes ago, TRon said:

We must really want Wissa badly if there's a deal to be done for Jackson that's under £60m and we aren't closing that out. 

Why not do both? IMO Isak is as good as done even if we just bench him for a year and sell overseas 

[TRon]

1 minute ago, OverThere said:

Why not do both? IMO Isak is as good as done even if we just bench him for a year and sell overseas 

 

Presumably because Brentford don't want to sell us Wissa. 

[duo]

So long as they don't try and pass him off as Isaks replacement 

[OverThere]

1 minute ago, duo said:

So long as they don't try and pass him off as Isaks replacement 

Who is the they? Eddie could improve him in the same manner as he did Isak. Isak was a virtual nobody until he arrived at NUFC. Who knows his ceiling really 

 

 

Edited August 22, 2025 by OverThere

[WinstonFC]

4 minutes ago, OverThere said:

Why not do both? IMO Isak is as good as done even if we just bench him for a year and sell overseas 

Because both would be missing 6 games at the AFCON ffs

[Mazzy]

6 hours ago, andycap said:

I think they like him and if there's a chance of getting him why not. 

 

Because he won't exactly be on low wages and that's their biggest problem currently. It's why they are going for lower price point players and loans. 

[Mazzy]

3 hours ago, TRon said:

We must really want Wissa badly if there's a deal to be done for Jackson that's under £60m and we aren't closing that out. 

 

Or we really aren't sure about Jackson but are very sure about Wissa.  Or we'd rather give Brentford £50M than Chelsea.

[1964]

3 hours ago, WinstonFC said:

Because both would be missing 6 games at the AFCON ffs

We could buy in January after selling blinky eyed rat boy

[TRon]

4 minutes ago, Mazzy said:

 

Or we really aren't sure about Jackson but are very sure about Wissa.  Or we'd rather give Brentford £50M than Chelsea.

 

Wissa is a more accomplished finisher tbf. But it feels like we are chasing a lost cause again, that's what I am calling into question. That's been an issue ever since the Guehi saga. 

[WinstonFC]

5 minutes ago, 1964 said:

We could buy in January after selling blinky eyed rat boy

AFCON starts 21st December thats 3 games before January

[Holloway]

 

[JonBez comesock]

If we get Jackson he is the Isak replacement 

 

I can then see us going for a second striker 

 

Finish off by selling Isak close to the deadline for £130m plus a fee add ons 

(£2 every side shank volley off target) 

[healthyaddiction]

21 minutes ago, JonBez comesock said:

If we get Jackson he is the Isak replacement 

 

I can then see us going for a second striker 

 

Finish off by selling Isak close to the deadline for £130m plus a fee add ons 

(£2 every side shank volley off target) 

I kind of agree but also disagree. I think Jackson would ultimately be Isak's replacement, but I don't think we'll sell Isak this summer.

[TK-421]

24 minutes ago, JonBez comesock said:

If we get Jackson he is the Isak replacement 

 

I can then see us going for a second striker 

 

Finish off by selling Isak close to the deadline for £130m plus a fee add ons 

(£2 every side shank volley off target) 

£5 for every 1 on 1 he fluffs

[MagPar]

1 hour ago, 1964 said:

We could buy in January after selling blinky eyed rat boy

Blinky eyed rat boy lol. Not a fan?