Jump to content

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, PauloGeordio said:

I honestly don’t think our overlords have any intention of selling him until next season. Liverpool have disrespected them and taken the proverbial. We don’t need to sell. Isak will have to eat humble pie very soon unless Eddie decides categorically that he can’t integrate him. Think we’ll get 2 strikers and Osula loaned out. Thankfully not long before this whole sorry saga comes to an end.

 

 

Yep, looks like Yasir has brought the big boot down and declared he stays. And tbh, a striker pairing of Isak (eventually) and Jackson as the Wilson replacement would do me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TRon said:

 

 

Yep, looks like Yasir has brought the big boot down and declared he stays. And tbh, a striker pairing of Isak (eventually) and Jackson as the Wilson replacement would do me. 

I’d take Wissa as he can lead the line out of the box, yet would love to see a Howed Jackson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, PauloGeordio said:

I honestly don’t think our overlords have any intention of selling him until next season. Liverpool have disrespected them and taken the proverbial. We don’t need to sell. Isak will have to eat humble pie very soon unless Eddie decides categorically that he can’t integrate him. Think we’ll get 2 strikers and Osula loaned out. Thankfully not long before this whole sorry saga comes to an end.

Liverpool are gangsters dealing with Keyser Söze. They make a raid, and PIF puts a hole in Isak's head.

 

 

Edited by gazza ladra

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, oldtype said:

Yeah I just don’t think we want him (although that may change depending on our level of desperation). If we offered what we offered for JSL he’d be on the pitch already.

Or they just want to give it less time for a saga. Suspect he’ll go somewhere right at the end.

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

At this point, i would question if we have any real interest in him. He seems to be the only forward available yet we haven't made a move. Unless he is the fallback option. 

Jackson is probably at the bottom of the list and rightly so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Usually the point of having a transparent background is to place a background or colour behind the image.

 

 

 

 

:lol: :lol: :lol:  

 

1 minute ago, christ said:

State of your .png mate.

 

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: 

His emoji game is weak AF too, Downie and Hope right now:


Comedy Look At You GIF by Run The Burbs

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bobbydazzla said:


Agreeing what they’ll pay him during the loan would be my guess 

He already has a contract with Chelsea and I doubt you get a pay rise for going on loan. 

The only thing to discuss would be what percentage Bayern want to pay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Elbel1 said:

He already has a contract with Chelsea and I doubt you get a pay rise for going on loan. 

The only thing to discuss would be what percentage Bayern want to pay

 

Which is a discussion between the clubs, not a discussion with the player. Player gets the same amount of money either way.

 

I suppose you would have to ask him "do you want to come here?" at least :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Elbel1 said:

He already has a contract with Chelsea and I doubt you get a pay rise for going on loan. 

The only thing to discuss would be what percentage Bayern want to pay


Google says: 

 

Performance bonuses for the loan player are typically paid by the loaning club, as they sign up to the local bonus scheme

 

So they’d need to agree with the loaned player what a new scheme would be even if the salary remains the same 

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, bobbydazzla said:


Google says: 

 

Performance bonuses for the loan player are typically paid by the loaning club, as they sign up to the local bonus scheme

 

So they’d need to agree with the loaned player what a new scheme would be even if the salary remains the same 

 

 

 

I didn't know that. 

Always thought that the the loaner just took over the existing contract, bonuses and all. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...