Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Zero said:

The 80m euro is just an option I think?

 

Its now a 65m Euro obligation with the loan fee increasing to 16.5m.  So they're paying less than they would have before if they ended up choosing to sign him permanently.  But they now have no option but to complete the deal next year.

 

 

Edited by Teasy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Bunk Moreland said:

They refused to spend £70m on Woltemade who they really wanted and ended up paying £70m for Jackson :burn2:

They are absolutely hopeless it's what a lack of domestic competition does to a motherfucker. 

 

140m on tat from English clubs. Hope Bayern call us willock or something so we get a go. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bunk Moreland said:

They refused to spend £70m on Woltemade who they really wanted and ended up paying £70m for Jackson :burn2:

 

Think they're panicking a bit after missing out on Wirtz and Woltemade, and Chelsea were then threatening to recall Jackson and all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 01/09/2025 at 17:49, Bunk Moreland said:

They refused to spend £70m on Woltemade who they really wanted and ended up paying £70m for Jackson :burn2:

As revealed, no they didn’t. Jackson’s buy obligation activates only after 40 starts this season. Bundesliga’s only 34 rounds so chances of that happening is zero, even with DFB Pokal and Champions League.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Elephant said:

As revealed, no they didn’t. Jackson’s buy obligation activates only after 40 starts this season. Bundesliga’s only 34 rounds so chances of that happening is zero, even with DFB Pokal and Champions League.

 

"As revealed" six days after I made that post. I'm not Clinton Baptiste ye kna

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bunk Moreland said:

 

"As revealed" six days after I made that post. I'm not Clinton Baptiste ye kna

Sorry for that mate. Jackson was not enough interesting to read this through, but still my mistake. Chelsea did not bother to read that loan contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Elephant said:

Sorry for that mate. Jackson was not enough interesting to read this through, but still my mistake. Chelsea did not bother to read that loan contract.

 

All good :laugh: After the transfer news broke it was being reported as an "easy" obligation and a big fee by the usually-reliable journos. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...