Jump to content

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, KaKa said:

https://as.com/futbol/primera/el-newcastle-aprieta-por-victor-munoz-f202606-n/

 

Víctor Muñoz and Newcastle are close to joining. The deal is in the works and could be finalized soon. The Magpies , having received €80 million for Anthony Gordon, are prepared to invest almost half that amount. As reported by El Chiringuito and confirmed by AS, the transfer fee being considered is €35 million plus another €5 million in add-ons. This is the same €40 million buyout clause as Osasuna, but structured differently. This new arrangement also allows for a more favorable tax treatment, as simply paying the clause directly is less advantageous. However, all of this is contingent on Real Madrid's decision.

 

Because it's important to remember that this is a four-way equation: Osasuna, Newcastle, Víctor Muñoz, and Real Madrid. Real Madrid owns 50% of the player's rights after selling him for €5 million last summer. They also retain a right of first refusal and the option to exercise a buy-back clause for between €8 and €10 million this summer. Therefore, if an agreement between the English club and Real Madrid's offices at El Sadar (the stadium), as well as the player himself, were to materialize— details of which are still pending —it would also have to be reviewed by Real Madrid and subject to their decision-making power. For Real Madrid, however, it would represent a significant financial boost. Specifically, a potential €20 million (€17.5 million guaranteed and €2.5 million in performance-related bonuses).

Seems like it'd be easier for them to just take the 20m guaranteed rather than buying him for 8-10m, presumably having to negotiate a contract, signing bonus etc. then hope to sell him for at least the £40m we're supposedly offering? Unless they actually want him back as part of the squad obviously.

 

Either way it feels like something probably needs to happen today - if everyone is mostly on the same page let's get it wrapped up. If he's waiting for someone else to come in then his side will want to drag it out as much as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

Seems like it'd be easier for them to just take the 20m guaranteed rather than buying him for 8-10m, presumably having to negotiate a contract, signing bonus etc. then hope to sell him for at least the £40m we're supposedly offering? Unless they actually want him back as part of the squad obviously.

 

Either way it feels like something probably needs to happen today - if everyone is mostly on the same page let's get it wrapped up. If he's waiting for someone else to come in then his side will want to drag it out as much as possible.

I'm sure we told all parties that we aren't willing to go any higher to prevent being squeezed by Real. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose said:

Friday is Ryday, I'm anticipating a juicy exclusive from our newfound bald messiah

 

"EXCLUSIVE: Jose Mourinho's love for Sir Bobby will allow Newcastle to have a clear path towards Victor Munoz. The special one will not stand in United's way @Lee_ryder"

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Elbel1 said:

It's not multi ownership. 

Real Madrid hold a buy back option that they MAY wish to activate. 

Quote

Real Madrid owns 50% of the player's rights after selling him for €5 million last summer

 Sound like multi ownership to me. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

 Sound like multi ownership to me. 

It's not, this is how big clubs so business now and it's great for them. It's like a really expensive loan where the potential upside is shared. 

 

These clauses should be banned but then again football has been eating itself for a long time so let's keep the feast going. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

It's not, this is how big clubs so business now and it's great for them. It's like a really expensive loan where the potential upside is shared. 

 

These clauses should be banned but then again football has been eating itself for a long time so let's keep the feast going. 

Buyback clause is one thing, owning a % of player means multiclub ownership. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

It doesn't. Are we apart of a multi club with Barca?

 

I'm hoping it's just worded badly in the article. It does read like ownership rather than sell-on clause, but as mentioned above, I don't even think they exist anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Shearergol said:

 

I'm hoping it's just worded badly in the article. It does read like ownership rather than sell-on clause, but as mentioned above, I don't even think they exist anymore.

Yeah I think it's badly worded but to be fair having a 50% sell on fee and owning 50% of the players registration is essentially the same thing. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, KingArthur said:

Buyback clause is one thing, owning a % of player means multiclub ownership. 

To me it does, if you own half a cart and I own half then it's owned by more then one person or multiple people, hence multi owners. But I'm no expert on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...