Jump to content

Racism in football


DJ_NUFC

Recommended Posts

Tom Adams ‏@tomEurosport

Key passage from statement:"The player and club were correct in reporting the matter to The FA." Shouldn't vilify Chelsea. Genuine mistake.

 

Sam Wallace ‏@SamWallaceIndy

FA say accusation by Ramires against Clattenburg 'made in good faith' but no charge. Initial feeling is judgement not too damaging for CFC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom Adams ‏@tomEurosport

Key passage from statement:"The player and club were correct in reporting the matter to The FA." Shouldn't vilify Chelsea. Genuine mistake.

 

Sam Wallace ‏@SamWallaceIndy

FA say accusation by Ramires against Clattenburg 'made in good faith' but no charge. Initial feeling is judgement not too damaging for CFC

while I agree with that in principle why in gods name did they announce it to every man and his dog shouting it to whomever cared to listen

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom Adams ‏@tomEurosport

Key passage from statement:"The player and club were correct in reporting the matter to The FA." Shouldn't vilify Chelsea. Genuine mistake.

 

Sam Wallace ‏@SamWallaceIndy

FA say accusation by Ramires against Clattenburg 'made in good faith' but no charge. Initial feeling is judgement not too damaging for CFC

while I agree with that in principle why in gods name did they announce it to every man and his dog shouting it to whomever cared to listen

 

Did they or did they just release a pretty run of the mill statement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tom Adams ‏@tomEurosport

Key passage from statement:"The player and club were correct in reporting the matter to The FA." Shouldn't vilify Chelsea. Genuine mistake.

 

Sam Wallace ‏@SamWallaceIndy

FA say accusation by Ramires against Clattenburg 'made in good faith' but no charge. Initial feeling is judgement not too damaging for CFC

while I agree with that in principle why in gods name did they announce it to every man and his dog shouting it to whomever cared to listen

Because they'd just been well and truly humped live on TV with two players sent off.

 

Fergie does it as well but never in a an 'open' a manner as Chelsea tried it. Stinks of bad loser-itis. Clattenburg will not se Chelsea on his rota for a long while yet. The FA should have him there next week but wont have the bottle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam Wallace ‏@SamWallaceIndy

PGMOL to introduce recording of referees & assistants' headset communications during matches in light of Clattenburg episode.

 

 

Good idea and will speed up the whole process should it rear it's head again :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The time is right for a respect the refree campaign.

 

 

About time grown adults manage to shut up to the match leader.

 

They tried that a while ago but the referees were, in general, so inept it got swept under the carpet. It simply won't work while they're basically inviting criticism with their performances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest malandro

Why should CFC get away with falsely accusing somebody of being a racist?

 

At the very least a grovelling apology and full disclosure of their 'evidence' is needed.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ObiChrisKenobi
STATEMENT ON CLATTENBURG DECISION

Posted on: Thu 22 Nov 2012

 

Chelsea Football Club accepts the Football Association's decision regarding Mark Clattenburg and welcomes the fact that the FA recognises the club and players were correct in reporting the matter.

 

The FA states Chelsea took the correct action following the Manchester United match and encourages all players who believe they have been either subject, or witness, to discriminatory abuse to report the matter immediately to the match officials on the day, and in turn to the FA.

 

The club also notes the charge brought against John Mikel Obi. While the player does not deny the charge, he will request a personal hearing to explain the mitigating circumstances.

 

With regards to the Mark Clattenburg decision, the club accepts the case is now concluded and notes the FA states the allegation was made in good faith.

 

Chelsea FC cooperated fully with the FA and provided 11 witness statements covering all events during and after the Premier League game on October 28.

 

Chelsea FC has a duty of care, as do all employers, to act responsibly when such allegations are reported by employees. We did not take the decision to lodge a formal complaint with the FA lightly and followed the correct processes and protocols throughout. The club carried out a thorough investigation, led by outside legal counsel, using all information available to us. As the FA makes clear, it is not uncommon for investigations to lead to no disciplinary charge being brought.

 

All those directly involved have been subjected to scrutiny over the last weeks. Chelsea FC now hopes that all concerned can continue to carry out their duties without prejudice.

 

We are committed to working alongside all referees and their assistants to ensure games are conducted in the right spirit and that all our players and staff accept and observe the match officials' authority and decisions.

 

No apology anywhere to Clattenburg.  :huff:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam Wallace ‏@SamWallaceIndy

PGMOL to introduce recording of referees & assistants' headset communications during matches in light of Clattenburg episode.

 

 

Good idea and will speed up the whole process should it rear it's head again :thup:

 

Phil Dowd is in trouble then :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fucking dreadful club and people. False accusations like that deserve to be ruthlessly punished. Clattenburg has been hung out to dry and his life and career will never be the same again. Chelsea need to be sanctioned and not by monetary fines which their amoral stupidillionaire thief of an owner (imo obv) will just laugh off anyway. Put them in Scottish Div 3 with the other cheats, where they belong, or preferably forcibly disband them.

 

:lol: I should really calm down, but I am quite cross with the utter shitbag liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll echo what others have said and say what a bunch of kunts everyone associated with that 'club' is.  If the powers that be are serious about addressing the issue then false claims should be dealt as equally strong as proven claims. 

 

Like the idea of recording the headset conversations tho would like to see them go the whole hog and have the same set up as rugby and be able to hear whats being said.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...