Racism in football

[Kimbo]

I think people in football want anonymity on social media removed and they think things like this will pressure the companies. I rarely see them acknowledge the wider subject of internet anonymity though. It’s a big topic that goes way beyond footballers being abused.

I’m assuming that’s what they want, it often comes up and I can’t see what other aim they have.

[ToonArmy1892]

10 minutes ago, madras said:

What is the point in any protest then ?

Was it worth Colin Kaepernick doing it in the first place ?

I'm not really knocking the protest, it's totally fair enough if people think taking a knee is doing something, i'm just not sure it is.

[madras]

5 minutes ago, ToonArmy1892 said:

I'm not really knocking the protest, it's totally fair enough if people think taking a knee is doing something, i'm just not sure it is.

Like I say it pushed the conversation. If it just stops then the conversation will drift away.......and it pisses my father in law off.

[Sima]

2 hours ago, joeyt said:

 

So this is when the revised Super League will surface?

‘Couldn’t comment fellas, we were doing the boycott’

[Disco]

2 hours ago, CFlan said:

Ffs lads, can you keep that stuff inside the stadiums. 

We try to keep our rankness internalised but you lot keep piping up online https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/55916729.amp

Safety

[jdckelly]

honestly I'm not sure football by itself can really do anything to stop this shit happening on social media and clearly the companies have no interest in doing anything so it will take legislation to force them to do something, that or we could just ban them all, would anything of real value be lost? 

[Abra Dubravka]

How can you really legislate beyond existing laws within the country against brainless idiots sending messages across an app though? 

It’s a horrible situation, but your always going to have scum in the world who will think it’s harmless and edgy to send racist crap across social media. Just as you’ll always have people people do any other immoral action and unlawful action.

You can’t expect Instagram to legislate for someone thinking their edgy and clever sending Paul Pogba a cartoon emoji of a monkey can you. 
 

Ian Wright got sent a deluge of guff by some child in Ireland and authorities duly dealt with it through laws of the land. You can’t have some internet Police and a different set of laws everyone across worldwide. Respective countries need to address it. 
 

Personally, I’d really question why any professional footballer needs a public Instagram or Twitter account anyway, beyond furthering their own ‘brand’.
 

If social media abuse was an horrible issue to certain players, I’d really question their morals and ask why their keeping themselves on there for. 
 

Clearly it’s worth the hassle so they can grow however many million followers. Check your ego and vanity, and leave it down to the club your playing for to post you all over their own official accounts. If they have foundations or what Rashford is up too, set up specific accounts for that.

 

 

Edited April 25, 2021 by Abra Dubravka

[jdckelly]

4 minutes ago, Abra Dubravka said:

How can you really legislate beyond existing laws within the country against brainless idiots sending messages across an app though? 

It’s a horrible situation, but your always going to have scum in the world who will think it’s harmless and edgy to send racist crap across social media. Just as you’ll always have people people do any other immoral action and unlawful action.

You can’t expect Instagram to legislate for someone thinking their edgy and clever sending Paul Pogba a cartoon emoji of a monkey can you. 
 

Ian Wright got sent a deluge of guff by some child in Ireland and authorities duly dealt with it through laws of the land. You can’t have some internet Police and a different set of laws everyone across worldwide. Respective countries need to address it. 
 

Personally, I’d really question why any professional footballer needs a public Instagram or Twitter account anyway, beyond furthering their own ‘brand’.
 

If social media abuse was an horrible issue to certain players, I’d really question their morals and ask why their keeping themselves on there for. 
 

Clearly it’s worth the hassle so they can grow however many million followers. Check your ego and vanity, and leave it down to the club your playing for to post you all over their own official accounts. If they have foundations or what Rashford is up too, set up specific accounts for that.

thats the exact reason, more and larger sponsorship deals can be gotten with a large social media presence, personally if I was a footballer I'd just pay someone else to handle it and never ever look at it myself, preferably someone who might actually watch the matches unlike a certain former england goalkeeper 

[Abra Dubravka]

18 minutes ago, jdckelly said:

thats the exact reason, more and larger sponsorship deals can be gotten with a large social media presence, personally if I was a footballer I'd just pay someone else to handle it and never ever look at it myself, preferably someone who might actually watch the matches unlike a certain former england goalkeeper 

Can’t remember last time I’ve looked at a footballers Instagram or Twitter, but I can picture the stuff on there - generic training and match day snaps, padded out with them trying to show how great their life is. Footballers don’t seem to be interesting people I’d invest my time reading about or watching - but that’s just me.
 

It’s a constant machine of increasing and maintaining their global popularity, and they are expecting everyone at the same time to be nice to them. The world simply doesn’t work like that. Your always going to have brainless twats taking a pop or trying to knock you down.
 

Not condoning any such abuse or excusing for what it is, but personally I don’t even think they are racist in the sense of deep lying hatred for X type of person that shapes who they are and daily life, they are just cowardice simpletons. They no right from wrong, and wouldn’t dream of projecting racial abuse in person or even in public to these players/people - yet think sending crap on Instagram isn’t going to get seen and is harmless, easy for me to say but their just retards in the definition sense of the word.

 

 

Edited April 25, 2021 by Abra Dubravka

[Guest neesy111]

Remember, these football clubs and players are using these social media platforms as free advertising and marketing for their own purposes on them.  So they can't go on like it's a 1 way street here, they are getting a lot of these platforms without paying much for it.

Yes, social media companies should be doing a lot more especially when Facebook is concerned (with it owning Instagram) and the resources it has but Twitter has hardly made a profit since it's existence and couldn't afford to hire 1000's of more content providers, it's a business at the end of the day.

I'd argue, a part of the reason is football and footballers using these platforms extensively that's brought the racist idiots that follow the sport onto them it etc.  Same way which Trump did to the far right wing base.

Mind, some simple measures would stop some of this.  Stop comments, DM's etc.

[Dokko]

Think people are being overly cynical (and I’m the most cynical person I know) and missing the point in that football is uniting against SM for the 1st time. This Is hopefully the start and will pressure SM platforms in to taking more action. If not expect more protesting and continued pressure. 

[Guest neesy111]

1 minute ago, Dokko said:

Think people are being overly cynical (and I’m the most cynical person I know) and missing the point in that football is uniting against SM for the 1st time. This Is hopefully the start and will pressure SM platforms in to taking more action. If not expect more protesting and continued pressure. 

But then what happens after that?  You're not getting to the route cause of the problem which is education of these people etc of racism etc.  Yeah, it might not be on social media anymore because you've blocked it all but those people are still going to have the same views etc.  Guessing that is more of a society problem.

[Candi_Hills]

5 minutes ago, Dokko said:

Think people are being overly cynical (and I’m the most cynical person I know) and missing the point in that football is uniting against SM for the 1st time. This Is hopefully the start and will pressure SM platforms in to taking more action. If not expect more protesting and continued pressure. 

I’ll give you an even more cynical take. Football and the media platforms are run by billionaires with similar political and economic interests. They’re already on the same page. This will be used to end the days of anonymity on Twitter and everybody will be required to register an account with their ID card / finger prints / soul. In the years following, the trend will continue across other platforms, putting an end to the Wild West days of the Internet. It’s about exerting further control over public discussion.

[Dokko]

4 minutes ago, neesy111 said:

But then what happens after that?  You're not getting to the route cause of the problem which is education of these people etc of racism etc.  Yeah, it might not be on social media anymore because you've blocked it all but those people are still going to have the same views etc.  Guessing that is more of a society problem.

It’s a 100% a society problem, with footballers being high profile targets usually by kids/teens who are trolling without any fear of consequences. There’s a lot of it atm probably because they are bored. Until your identity is recorded by SM platforms then it will continue, it’s up to the platforms to make them less anon and account more accountable for their posts.

Even education isn’t going to resolve it unless this is done. The kids doing it IRL wouldn’t be like this, wouldn’t hold these views but turn in to something else when they can say something without any implications coming their way. Take that mask of secrecy from them and the government imposing greater consequences for racial abuse in the online world and then it drops and where an education drive might be successful. Guess I’m saying you need both for this to work.

[Dokko]

7 minutes ago, Candi_Hills said:

I’ll give you an even more cynical take. Football and the media platforms are run by billionaires with similar political and economic interests. They’re already on the same page. This will be used to end the days of anonymity on Twitter and everybody will be required to register an account with their ID card / finger prints / soul. In the years following, the trend will continue across other platforms, putting an end to the Wild West days of the Internet. It’s about exerting further control over public discussion.

I’d be happy with that.

It’s always a knobhead shouting freedom of speech like it gives them the right to be a cunt for the sake of it.

[Guest neesy111]

2 minutes ago, Dokko said:

It’s a 100% a society problem, with footballers being high profile targets usually by kids/teens who are trolling without any fear of consequences. There’s a lot of it atm probably because they are bored. Until your identity is recorded by SM platforms then it will continue, it’s up to the platforms to make them less anon and account more accountable for their posts.

Even education isn’t going to resolve it unless this is done. The kids doing it IRL wouldn’t be like this, wouldn’t hold these views but turn in to something else when they can say something without any implications coming their way. Take that mask of secrecy from them and the government imposing greater consequences for racial abuse in the online world and then it drops and where an education drive might be successful. Guess I’m saying you need both for this to work.

I can't believe kids under 16 are allowed SM profiles. 

[Candi_Hills]

7 minutes ago, Dokko said:

I’d be happy with that.

It’s always a knobhead shouting freedom of speech like it gives them the right to be a cunt for the sake of it.

It would however mean that people as likeable as Tom Werner and Joel Glazer have complete control over what can and can’t be said. 

[Dokko]

1 minute ago, Candi_Hills said:

It would however mean that people as likeable as Tom Werner and Joel Glazer have complete control over what can and can’t be said. 

How? 

[Candi_Hills]

29 minutes ago, Dokko said:

How? 

It’s very difficult to be a dissenting voice on social media as it is. You don’t have to breach the terms of service to receive a ban. However, as long as one stays on the right side of the law, then there’s usually no threat of further punishment. You signed up, got banned and slipped away all anonymously.

With the option of anonymity removed, everybody would be held “publicly accountable” for what they say. And when I say publicly accountable, I mean that they would be subject to artificially designed public pressure. Public outrage is controlled and manipulated to serve power. Always. 

Social movements can be broken down into three types: 

1. Genuine grassroots movements which are then co-opted by the system for their own ends.

2. Genuine grassroots movements which the system works tirelessly to suppress.

3. Astroturfed movements, set up by the system to look like grassroots movements. 

In other words, there is no room for dissent on social media or media in general. Any social movement which has media momentum was either set up by the system to serve the system or has been co-opted by it. 

ID registration just makes everything easier to manage.

 

 

 

 

Edited April 25, 2021 by Candi_Hills

[Happinesstan]

Football is going to boycott it's biggest marketing tool. For a weekend. Good for them.

 

I love the fact MOTD announced it just before our game, with Lineker adding "and other people involved in the game"

 

 

Edited April 25, 2021 by Happinesstan

[Dokko]

1 hour ago, Candi_Hills said:

It’s very difficult to be a dissenting voice on social media as it is. You don’t have to breach the terms of service to receive a ban. However, as long as one stays on the right side of the law, then there’s usually no threat of further punishment. You signed up, got banned and slipped away all anonymously.

With the option of anonymity removed, everybody would be held “publicly accountable” for what they say. And when I say publicly accountable, I mean that they would be subject to artificially designed public pressure. Public outrage is controlled and manipulated to serve power. Always. 

Social movements can be broken down into three types: 

1. Genuine grassroots movements which are then co-opted by the system for their own ends.

2. Genuine grassroots movements which the system works tirelessly to suppress.

3. Astroturfed movements, set up by the system to look like grassroots movements. 

In other words, there is no room for dissent on social media or media in general. Any social movement which has media momentum was either set up by the system to serve the system or has been co-opted by it. 

ID registration just makes everything easier to manage.

 

 

ID registration doesn’t stop social movement, in fact it could help as you don’t get the bots signed up to try and steer public opinion. That has more sway than any genuine movement which if worthy will pick up traction and spread anyway. You’d not have brexit for example, trump probably wouldn’t have won the presidency. World events which changed the current landscape for generations. 
 

It’s time for the world to stop hiding behind their digital mask and show themselves. We’ve abused the privilege for far too long. Let’s see who they  are and see if their rabid opinions and bullshit still flies. My guess is not.

[Candi_Hills]

57 minutes ago, Dokko said:

ID registration doesn’t stop social movement, in fact it could help as you don’t get the bots signed up to try and steer public opinion. That has more sway than any genuine movement which if worthy will pick up traction and spread anyway. You’d not have brexit for example, trump probably wouldn’t have won the presidency. World events which changed the current landscape for generations. 
 

It’s time for the world to stop hiding behind their digital mask and show themselves. We’ve abused the privilege for far too long. Let’s see who they  are and see if their rabid opinions and bullshit still flies. My guess is not.

Genuine movements which pose a threat to power are either co-opted or squashed. Twitter and the media is the system. The billionaires who own these platforms are not going to let any prole resistance take off.

 

[joeyt]

 

[Disco]

Jens Lehmann has self cancelled himself.

[BlueStar]

35 minutes ago, Disco said:

Jens Lehmann has self cancelled himself.

"The 51-year-old sent a WhatsApp message to Aogo, asking: “Is Dennis actually your Quotenschwarzer (token black guy)?”

The Germans have a word for everything.