All Activity

Yeah a classic case of Chinese Whispers

My back of a fag packet numbers reckons that we should be able to push out to nine figures without sales. We lost a total of £42m in the previous two seasons to this one (-£70m in 2023, +£28m in 2024). Given that our income hasn’t moved this season (and will actually have decreased due to the lack of player sales compared to the PSR-tastic sales of Anderson and Minteh), I’d bet that we end up showing a loss of around £30m in PSR terms this season - which keeps the books balanced (and also accounts for the lack of incomings this month - though there’s likely a bit of wriggle-room). The TL;DR is that means that this season we might actually be able to do the ‘full loss’ of £105m in PSR terms and not break PSR - though of course this would knack us further down the line (and the rules change next season to be far tighter). Allowing for the increase in revenues with CL, which should absorb the operating losses this season, the club should be able to spend £100m on transfers without unduly worrying, and likely go a bit higher. How much higher depends on their risk appetite; and if we do go a lot higher, if we don’t start getting ruthless in selling players then we’ll end up seeing the transfer slowdowns again next season.

Be a first if we sign that Korean fella. The first time any club has signed a player that doesn't exist.

I'd be deflated rather than devastated if he left next summer ( he's going nowhere this season imo) but that would be reversed if he defects to any of the odious cunts around us

Just managed to coax her back inside by dressing up as Big Dan Burn. Made some makeshift stilts out of bamboo, was ushering her inside when I lost my balance and careered into the kitchen. The stilts split in half, smashed my head off the hob and now have first degree burns. It was all worth it though, and the good news is that Park's primary position is left winger so we've finally managed to fill that hole

If you look closely his name is an anagram of 'don't be so gullible ya daft cunts' 🤷‍♂️

He mainly plays in a back 3.

Was Elanga in our shirt? Didn't see that. I think the difference here is that this is a firm two fingers up at Man Utd from Garnacho.

Doesnt change anything if we dont change system.

Can't even find a Youtube hype compilation of the lad. Steve Nickson masterclass

How so?

22/23 was Willocks last good season, if you're relying on him in 25/26 that's a massive gamble. I like Miley and think he'll be a great player one day, but he's not ready for a lot of football just yet

They know how desperate we are for a signing. Tell your kid it’s back on.

If the Scalvini rumour is true then it suggests we’ll be lining up with back a 3/ back 5 more in the coming season.

I'd much rather we paid our top players top money. There's only probably a couple who would command it anyway, the rest are replaceable.

According to Transfermrkt Scalvini missed 33 games in 23/24: But his wikipedia page says he played 44 times in 23/24: That doesn't add up.

He's not our player

Aye, you new to being a football fan?

Huge news? Can someone tell us why it’s huge news?

He eats Kimchi, he drinks OB, he hates fucking Sunderland

Park Seung-Who?

Tough game for City then

Which is the same as what I’m saying. He neither said yes to us. Open to listening to our pitch the usual line an agent will use.