All Activity

This isn't even true and even if it were it's grossly misleading. Wharton has 31 PL starts with 2500 minutes played, plus another 800 minutes in domestic cups. He also had two Championship seasons at Miley's age accounting for another 3,000 minutes played. Miley has half as many PL starts with 1500 minutes and also around 800 cup minutes (including CL). We're probably 12-18 months away from being able to make a fair comparison to current Wharton and he'll still be younger than Wharton is now.

Please stay healthy and if there is any doubts just shut down and wait for the next season

Ha, that takes me back. Crazy what eventually became of him pretty shortly afterwards.

He did it more today than I think I can remember ever seeing. But fuck it, he was otherwise excellent today. Really helped set the tone. It was the game I could see him having at a crucial time in our run in, much more like his old self. Just need him to return to putting that out consistently now.

Thought he quietened down a lot in the second half, just think he was more tired.

Assuming true, it's the kinda of ffp dealing is applied however Ramsay doesn't look the same since he returned from injury. Barnes is the much more effective player at this stage although Ramsay is both a long term target and has a better age profile

It's mad how he can go long spells without playing and come back without messing a beat. A true rolls Royce. Also obviously we discuss squad a lot and we've achieved so much this season and this lad has barely played. Lewis hall has been out for long periods too. The cartel better hope we don't have money to spend because we are about to pack them up

We do a fair bit of that ourselves to be honest so I'll take that as part of the business... Thought he had a great game, particularly considering the incident.

Think it has to be Burn for all the reasons that have been said. Hall was probably mine prior to his injury, but Burn's been a colossus for us all season long, even in the bad times.

Over 130 years of professional football in this country and only since VAR has been introduced have such incidents been deemed offside.

That second half was odd, I'm not sure what was going on. Can only think we looked to defend against a toothless ten and hit them on the break, but our break was piss poor. So they just kept coming back. Meekly. Anyway, job done. Score a goal or two and don't concede and you'll add 3 points to your total. Win ugly and you're laughing and all that.

Just seen the offside goal Palace scored against Spurs with the offending players feet planted in his own half How anyone can be for these current offside rules is beyond me.

What was he booked for? I just went back and watched it again, and during the initial foul (on us from which Bruno scored) he was miles away in our half. The camera never showed the melee or whatever went on, just the ref then getting the card out.

Before he left Arsenal I thought Nketiah had something about him and given the chance had the potential to be a good goal scorer. He doesnt.

just seen that. outrageous decision.

I think forest are cooked now. Spurs and Man U bottom of form chart and unlikely to try much harder ahead of final. I suppose if Man U win they could be on a high for final day but not expecting any more favours.

They paid nowt for him and why should he give up money so FSG can bank it?

Probably already mentioned, but Forest getting points vs Chelsea would mean that 68 is enough. If Forest also drop points vs West Ham in this scenario, 67 would probably do (depending on Chelsea gd vs ours).

I can actually see a situation where City miss out Dropping points to Southampton was brutal and their remaining fixtures aren't easy, they have very little margin for error as I think less than 69 points won't be enough

Think this also. We still need 3 pts IMO.

Pretty simple, if they match their results they are ahead. And Forest away doesnt look that scary atm.

He came on right after Murphy got rinsed on that side too. Think that change was perfect. Murph is fine as a wing back but not in a 4.

The bookies have Chelsea with a much better chance than Villa of qualifying. 8/13 Chelsea 8/5 Villa. Even though Chelsea have to go to Forest on the last day. I don't get it. https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/top-5-finish

For at least 70 years probably!