Jump to content

Zero

Member
  • Posts

    6,661
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Zero

  1. I mean it looks great that we designed a little window for us to react if Bruno’s clause was not triggered - but the reality is we shouldn’t face that life-saving 7 days in the first place.
  2. Currently I don’t have high hopes on the revenue side because obviously the club is waiting for the Man City case Gordon should never be considered as an option, and that shows how desperate we were at end of June. To be honest I don’t understand why the club made that enquiry - if Gordon is the only last option, I would take the 6 points penalty. I know many won’t agree but I would take that penalty over Minteh as well. By having a better RW, not only we could have 6 points more, we could also retain an asset that we could sell in the future. I understand as a fans we all want to have immediately success and, we should have the best squad available right now by all means. Taking Joelinton and Barnes over Anderson and Minteh looks justified. The problem is, what about next season? What if we are unable to finish Top 6? Do we still have enough PSR capacity to improve or revamp the squad? or we can only rely on deteriorating players as we are still suffering from amortizing loss? Other than Gordon, Bruno or Miley, who else can we sell at that time? Is the sales proceeds enough for raising PSR capacity or it’s just enough for meeting the requirement or that would be the league points penalty again? There are fucking lot of PSR questions hanging above the clubs head. What I see is people didn’t realize how disastrous our future would be (long term), and keep on asking the club to pull the trigger now (short term). I don’t know it’s experience or lack of patience or what. We won’t be Leeds because we have the richest owner in the world, but under PSR we could be facing 4-5 years of rebuilding process, starting from the bottom half of the table again. I don’t know what PIFs plan is but I guarantee this is not within their original plan. Whether this is fine to you I don’t know. Not to me.
  3. The problem I find it interesting, amazing, or even amusing, is that many people didn’t realize this is a fucking gamble the club should never take. It is essentially spending in advance. The club should not assume that Bruno’s clause will be triggered and use that as the “hope” to fulfill the PSR gap. This is 100% mismanagement. We shouldn’t spend that much last summer, or we should sell Joelinton instead of giving an extension. Whatever. And, if Bruno stays, great. If he left, we should use that 100m and our scouting database to get our next Bruno. It’s like people applauding someone for putting out the fire at the last minute, ignoring the fact that it’s that guy who set up the fire at the first place. How can you give credit to the club/management and say the fire sales is great piece of business?
  4. Sometimes people should think about what is “long term” and what is “short term” for the club, and what is risk management, and also what the club should do before making such a controversial decision. Great piece of business? Sounds like we should glad that we are forced to have a fire sale at June? And even Anderson has firmly established himself as a regular starting eleven in Forest. We sold for what? 10m? Ouch. Jesus.
  5. That’s probably our best lineup, just without Botman and Isak. We should be good enough to get 3 points today. Come on lads
  6. To be honest that’s why those organising parties shouldn’t impose that much rules that forced different parties to go the legal tribunal route.
  7. Zero

    Marc Guehi

    We can also diverse the risk by splitting the budget among a few prospects
  8. I have had a feeling that Howe told the team not to play with 120% effort against poorer teams to prevent injuries.
  9. I was suspecting this for long - Howe reserved the intensity tactic for big games only
  10. Great game, hope that finally lifts the team morale and start to click
  11. Weird feeling Thats probably the best 45 mins we have been playing this season, considering it’s Man City We probably deserves a draw, yet I know we can’t
  12. Yes but at also depends on how much PIF is genuinely willing to invest
  13. Considering the amount of games Villa has to play this season, and they have lost players like Diaby and Luiz, I agree that Villa is our benchmark. We should finish above them.
  14. End of season may be, but right now there is none in the market that is better than Howe. And to be fair - I know many won’t agree - the last game it’s the players that let Howe down. As a manager he probably could do more, say giving Tonali more minutes, but to me, I am impressed by what he did during half time - switching to 442 and giving Hall freedom to organise the attack. We have criticised his tactical flexibility last season and to my surprise I think he did show his willingness to change. Some good, some bad. The question probably should be why we always started the game in such a bad way, that we need to ride our luck with only 45 mins left. Pre match preparation? Our plan A (433) got found out? Bruno not up to his standard? We don’t need to repeat how the window let Howe down. I just want to point out that our players should share more blame than Howe. Schar has been fucking ridiculous this season, except for that strike, what did he do? Lots of mistakes, red card, missed the sitter. And Bruno/ Joe? Again just one good game so far? Trippier and Kelly telling us why they should be substitutes? Livra and Barnes probably are the only players that kept their required standard. Hall and Burn got a pass from me. Even Isak has been fucking disappointing. You can’t just blame the tactics or the players quality for the poor display on the pitch.
  15. It’s fine that we have different opinion, but genuinely speaking, at work place, if your boss publicly started the war against you, like what Mitchell did to Howe, you should consider all your options, because you know your boss will never be your allies
  16. To be fair we all know that one of them will go at the end of this season. Better change the question to who will be fired by PIF. No fans will support Mitchell at this moment but at the end of this season, our owner will decide whom he will support
  17. I just want to add a point, whilst a DOF is not a scout, he is still the one that should have the final say on transfer, and that he is also the one that should be credited for, and accountable for, the transfer as a whole. If he decided that the team needs talents for the future, he will assign scouts to give him potential targets, thus formulate his long term transfer plans. If he decided that the team needs established stars, he will decide which one to go for and contact the agents, after considering the scouts reports I genuinely think we made sensible transfers under Ashworth era, before January of coz.
  18. The latter might be due to squad hierarchy?
  19. Looks like it’s our 433 being found out
×
×
  • Create New...