

Colos Short and Curlies
Member-
Posts
11,616 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Colos Short and Curlies
-
And that's something to be proud about?
-
Beat Palace 6 nil, Villa 2 nil and Spurs 1 nil, Palace lose their remaining 3 games and we send the buggers down!
-
I can see the dog botherers beating Everton but not sure that they'll get a point against Stoke. If they need to beat Watford to finish above us then they wont
-
yes - and then held onto his insurance details for a little too long
-
I just appreciated that he was blowing out of his arse after 80 minutes on Tuesday, and not from being unfit
-
How fucking dare you. Read my posts carefully. At no point have I mentioned males or females. In case you hadn't noticed, rape can work both ways. Also, note that when I have used the term 'cry rape', I have done so in inverted commas (as in they are not my words) and I certainly haven't said that the complaint in the case in hand 'cried rape'. Your faux-rage is typical of those who don't really understand what is being debated, so you just take the safe option and join the braying mob. I have only been speaking objectively, and certainly haven't suggested anything like 'all women are liars' or whatever you are implying. Simply wanting rape cases to be handled in an objective fashion, with anonymity until proven guilty for all does not make me some sort of sexist pig. I would normally be polite, but since you started it, you can go and fuck yourself, and take your false, fashionably offended atitude with you. How dare you try and play the sexist card at me, just because you don't agree with what I have said. Technically women can't rape a man (or indeeed another woman)
-
Bizarre way of looking at it - but it may be better for us if Everton and Stoke aren't busting a gut against a Big Sam side that will sit back and attack on the break. If the opposition isn't attacking then there is nothing to break against - result nil nil
-
You know what, I have always been against it. But I think I agree for things like this. The same way when they use it in Cricket, just to check if it's a no ball or not. I wouldn't want to see it brought in for other decisions, though. As you would get situations similar to Vardy vs Arsenal and also against West Ham. Where it's still inconclusive and people have different views on whether or not it was a foul, dive or neither. I just worry, that if it is brought in for offsides. They'll start using it for other decisions, like red cards, goal scoring opportunities, penalties etc. I don't want that and I really do think that would ruin the flow of the game. 100% agree - it needs to be for yes/no decisions only, and not where there is subjectivity. The only yes/no decisions for me are (1) is the ball within the field of play (including goals), (2) last touch before leaving the field of play, (3) offside, (4) amoutn of injury time to be played. Anything elese has a grey area and needs to be allowed to be judged by the ref
-
Strange that 3 points could keep us up but 8 might still see us relegated
-
Black and White tie - little touches make a difference
-
Sunderland lose to Stoke, beat Everton - 36 points
-
Feels a bit like Pompey in 92 tomorrow
-
Didn't he have a hand in all 4 goals when Swansea drew 2-2 with Liverpool?
-
Sissoko and Gini are the ones who only turn up for school when a fire drill is planned
-
Despite how bad we were yesterday, both us and the dog botherers would have been expected to lose this weekend, Norwich would have looked at it being a chance to stretch the gap. So its been a neutral weekend for us and a poor weekend for Norwich
-
If not Rafa it will be Cathro or Beardsley by default