healthyaddiction

To be fair they state in that thread it's not his technical passing ability. It's the decision making on what passes to make. I think that comes with changing to a completely new position and is something that is likely easier to coach.

Amine Gouiri

I'd be quite happy for them to be in the Prem, with where we're going with our new owners it'll be hilarious to watch the relentless dicking we'll give them twice a season.

Wasn't this about a week after the exact same keeper was lobbed by Beckham from the half way line?

So do we ignore the fact that Messi is winning the league this season while Ronaldo is battling it out with West Ham for 6th?

If you only count starts he's a 1 in 2.

There was a report they were going to be using the Nad Al Sheba Sports Complex.

It's a board game ASM made.

He has freedom of choice. So do the decision makers at any club who can decide that someone who is refusing the vaccine may be risking the health of teammates and may have a bit of a character flaw.

Brighton were missing both their first choice centre halves and recently sold their backup to us. I think that's why things fell apart for them.

Not rumours, it's literally in the official statement. Edit: although it's not to one female colleague but several.

Has Shelvey been very good of late? He was good against Leeds but was tragic against Watford. Wasn't there a stat that he made 3 successful challenges in the entire 90 mins?

Makes sense, because Bruno is fucking klass.

He looks good in this one:

They aren't a news source. They just share reports from elsewhere.

I think it is really that 7 players in the matchday squad played in our side vs Villa in the Championship.

I feel like we're trying to sign one top end centre back (Botman/Carlos) and one cheaper option (Diop/Phillips) with the players we're linked to. Would be sensible move. Too many of our centre backs aren't Prem quality but we're not likely to be able to afford two top end centre halves.

Man City can prove the deal represents a fair market value because they have a history of expensive sponsorships. The fact that that history is based on inflated deals from related companies though is why this system is completely broken.

Some random bloke on a Twitter thread earlier today reported pretty mcuh dead on this (the free + longstaff). Could there actually be a real ITK on Twitter?

I think Craig Hope mentioned an interest.

Not sure we have to win half our games. We're 3 points from safety.

Yeah, it depends on the quality but three players could transform the side still. If Trippier is the full-back and the other two are of a similar quality then it'd improve us massively.

So a centre-back, full-back and centre-mid minimum, but ideally also an attacking-mid and striker according to that article. Sounds about right probably.

The follow up tweet says the previous deals is across the PL, not based on NUFCs previous deals alone.

That also ignores amortisation, where the cost of the player is actually spread over the length of the players contract. So if we spent £50m on a player with a 5 year contract, that would only count as £10m for this year (but would obviously affect each subsequent year by £10m.