Ronaldo

Do you not pay attention, or are you just thick? Such a you post.

Well, yeah, Gouffran does virtually nothing I expect from a winger, that's the difference. Dummett's an easy target for the mongs because he's so poor with the ball. I could barely care less about that if he defends well - which he does, consistently. Obviously in the PL we need someone who can go forward and defend, though they're never easy to find - I don't think we've had any that fit that description in years. I can pretty much guarantee that player isn't anyone on our books, fwiw.

Just play the best defender there, ie Dummett. If there's an issue with our attacking play it isn't because of the LB.

It's far more embarrassing when the manager's Allardyce, Bruce, Southgate or Pardew.

Awesome to laugh at, yeah.

He told a very funny story about him and Shay Given shampooing Bobby's hair in the showers.

25 games, actually.

It's about time Broadmoor had their broadband cut off.

Go look at Pennywell (using Google Earth, not in person) and you'll never ask that question again.

Give over. Quite clearly a smashing guy, just a rubbish footballer.

At least the stupid shit on here recently is generally coming from the same posters.

I think we had 24 points from our first 13 games last time. Gotta think we'll be better off than that in 2 games time.

Smith or Butt were predominantly the anchor then Not in the second half of the season they weren't. It was Guthrie and Nolan in the middle.

We need some additions in January, like. Can't be having Colback and Gouffran regularly starting games in midfield. We're lacking a goalscorer hugely if Gayle gets injured, too.

Sorry dude, Ryder Cup weekend.

Genuinely laughed.

Gallows' 17 posts are definitely worth a read, like.

Pure speculation, like. It's more to do with his godawful performance against Wolves plus Clark's assured displays since then. That performance was no worse than Clark's against Reading or Lascelles against Fulham. Aside from that anyway he was part of the team which conceded zero goals in over 400 minutes and a big reason why. Let's not act like he's been consistently bad, if anything it's the opposite. Clark has been great from what I have seen so deserves his place until further notice, but the majority of Mbemba's performances have been great and all 3 of the CBs in question have had poor performances. I don't dislike Mbemba but this is tosh, like.

He sounds American as fuck.

:thup:

Can't say I agree with that, his last ten minutes aside. I thought he was very assured and always in the right position today. As far as the Colback's scale goes, that was right up there. On the overall scale it was still low down there, we should be dominating the midfield so much more. Still don't agree. I hate him as much as the next guy but thought he had a good game in his role by anyone's standards. Good in what way? Sitting in front of the back 4 and mopping up play, distributing the ball well (for the most part) and generally being a grunt, doing the dogs work. Is this satire? No, just the weirdo who was defending McClaren while he was blatantly taking us down. Colback was typically shit today.

Pure speculation, like. It's more to do with his godawful performance against Wolves plus Clark's assured displays since then.

I think Mbemba's gonna spend most on the season on the bench, like.