It's definitely not acceptable not signing a CB.
But then again, I think most of us probably accepted it.
Still seems like economic madness risking millions in revenue in terms of league position based on a couple of hundred grand, but that's NUFC for you.
It seems insane in the long run to risk not signing him.
Say we don't get him, and Coloccini takes a long-term injury (God forbid). Then Perch is in there for long-term. The loss of points associated with that will result in lower league places, which means we'll get less revenue and it'll probably cost us more than the £700k in the first place. Where's the sense in that?
Unacceptable. No other word for it.
Yes, it's great having Cisse, but as Cisse, Sow and Ba just showed at ACN, it's no good having a lethal strikeforce if your defence is decimated. See 4-2 at Norwich for proof.
This.
He was the victim of terrible injuries, always tried hard but clearly wasn't good enough.
He'll probably do extremely well in lower leagues. And it's easy to resent him for picking up those kinda wages, but we gave them to him. It's our own fault.
Read something interesting on Twitter that people aren't allowed, under UK law, to post opinions about the trial. Only facts. And that includes on Twitter.
Wouldn't want anything negative to come out about Arr 'Arry now, would we?