Froggy

Fairly accurate tbf.

They didn't. You're going by what Stefan Borson said on TalkSport, which was already rubbished by Kieran Maguire. Source: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5687061/2024/08/08/manchester-uniteds-40m-controversial-covid-loss-explained/ See above my friend. See above my friend. You don't know what any club got. They probably didn't get near the amount we were allowed, because their losses were nowhere near ours.

He does, but they're usually successful no? it's the final pass that isn't.

Because every club had them, the difference being that Man United are listed on the NY stock exchange so have to make all finances public. Other clubs don't have to do this, so the covid exceptions aren't on the accounts. Hope this helps.

Fans have zero problem with Rashford and Garnacho leaving, as long as it's a good price for Garnacho. They're two trouble makers in the squad. Thankfully they're PSR assets so it'll be two birds with one stone.

Only with Man United does the pre-training warmup get shared around and made into a negative.

Barcola had a €45m release clause. Worth far more than that.

Garnacho going to finish with a Europa League, FA Cup and a Scudetto to his name.

Rashford is no striker.

It does when you play for us.

Same amount of goal contributions this season as Garnacho though, and Garnacho has barely been used since November. He's also 3.5 years younger. Also won trophies, including scoring in the final. Thoughts? Using the logic on here, if Gordon is worth £80m, Garnacho should be £120m.

How much is Gordon worth? Genuine question.

Isak was pure shite when I watched him last as well.

10 goals and 5 assists last year and scored in FA Cup final at 19. Full international at 18. He's done alright.

He is rated very highly, but he doesn't fit into Amorim's system, and a good sale on him would allow us to spend quite heavily in the summer. It's a transfer that makes sense. He also has ego and attitude issues so there won't be too many upset at him leaving, even if he is very talented. It'll be more than £50m though unless there's a big sell on clause or numerous add ons.

It's not even close to enough unless there's serious clauses included.

Yeah they do talks at the ground the odd time and sometimes show new signings about etc. Silly wee jobs a few times a year.

They're "global ambassadors." These cuts are fair IMO.

From their academy alone the last two summer windows: Palmer - £43m Charles - £10m Trafford - £15m Forbs - £12m Harwood-Bellis - £20m Delap - £15m That's £115m of pure profit PSR wise. They can spend a fortune off the back of that alone and that's not even including the Alvarez deals plus the sales of Mahrez/Laporte/Cancelo to Saudi. They are golden for a while yet.

Leipzig have no chance of signing him.

He said in the same sentence, "I know you want headlines. There's your headline." You could almost say it was a tongue in cheek remark based on that. Maybe he does need to clarify what he said mind, and I'm sure he'll be asked about it before the next match in the press conference so will be given the opportunity to do so. I agree with what he said though, that in this moment in time we're being the worst team in Man United history. I know we've been relegated before, but the form we're in is relegation form. I'm sure this is what he meant.

I would disagree. I thought Alvarez was class, and £14m for him was outstanding business.

Alvarez had 100+ apps in two seasons and scored over 30 goals. It's just good scouting. Nothing else.

I have more than one friend Shay.