r0cafella

Loans don't count for psr.

He did his best for sure, he put one decent cross in that's about all I remember. Barnes excels at cutting inside from the left, you take that away and you aren't left with much.

Man united looking ropey at the back.

Don't think he was let down by Tino whom we know is a wingback who stays wide. He was let down by the manager who's tactic seems to revert to crossing the ball to nobody when we are struggling. Harvey Barnes is not a right winger Period.

Guehi og

Get in !

Big second half coming up.

We know the answer to this. Wilson isn't up to playing 70 minutes and Willie isn't trusted at this moment in time.

Keep playing like this and a new stadium won't be needed at all.

Messi aside playing with False 9 means you need another goal scorer but looking at out set up I'm struggling to identify who that goal scorer is. Barnes playing off the right doesn't inspire me.

Wow incredible miss from Munoz.

It's probably a knock as it was an impact injury.

We've been throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks all season. We are a team without an identity.

Despite us regressing over the last 18 months or so he's actually stepped up and pushed on. Deserves a lot of credit.

You aren't wrong.

How many injuries will we get today lads? I'm saying 3

Barnes coming on, no idea why.

Isak down again.

One for the ages so far this.

Decision will be made In the new year they have promised to consult the fans. I expect concrete news in q1 personally.

Sure they could but then Liverpool get another sponsor and the same rate they wanted originally and the gap continues to increase. The point being that with such rules in place with prohibit owner investment via direct means and essentially cap related sponsors at some arbitrary made up number the gap never gets closed. Manchester United are a prime example, logic would dictate they would have less generous sponsors as they've sucked for awhile and don't exactly shine PR wise yet they earn the most If a competitive playing field is desired (it isn't) the rules we have in place only foster protectionism.

Im not keen on TCD Language here it's inflammatory without cause. That being said I do agree with the nature of his point. The reason why related party deals are so important to us is it's our only realistic way of closing the gap to the likes of spurs. Unfortunately whilst we were being tortured by Ashley the rest of the league were investing in marketing and creating a global fan base, this factor makes them a lot more appealing commercial partners than we are. As I've often repeated, why would I sponsor us when I can sponsor Liverpool for the same cost. Sponsoring Liverpool gives my brand ALOT more eyeballs. This is precisely why the PL and the so called members fought so hard to pass APT rules because they know all of this.

I'm with you, if they were over and they got away with it on the basis of exemptions which were claimed at a level much higher than anyone else's or not used by anyone else it's fishy to say the least. Quite ironic that the psr cheerleaders that they are against anchoring and allowed to have larger COVID claims than everyone else.

They are fine.

Barnes is serviceable as a squad player that is a good point. If he's content with that role I've got no objections. Guehi is good and I like him but id prefer someone is who more actually dominant as we might be a bit exposed defending set pieces having him. Fee has to come way down too.