Kid Icarus

The centre circle Looks great otherwise though. Gonna have to just start saving these on my phone tbh.

You would think/hope that this is where we're aiming for now.

It's a shame we can't have pinned posts within threads because there's already been some gerlden phertershop merments imo

To Photoshop!

Could be this era's Odeon if it plays untelevised matches.

Shag my arse

Lest we forget his performance against Barcelona. One of the most ridiculous goalkeeping performances I can remember.

I loved owt like that when I was a kid like. I had the NUFC cushions and mini strip in my dad's car, the St George's flag up at my window during Euro '96, the lot. Some adults don't seem to have gone through the 'everything is cringe' phase of being a teenager though.

'pick up' for a signing or transfer is infinitely worse imo, fucking hate it.

I have to agree like. He's more of a social figure that's attached to the area and the personification of who we like to think of ourselves and the club as. It's nice that he has a statue, but it's also mad that at the same time Joe Harvey gets a plaque and Kevin Keegan has nothing.

More sprints maybe? Willock's one of our fastest players.

No one's disputing any of that like, was just a weird reaction to finding out someone had survived He's alive!...for now

Chelsea being in that group at all is an utter joke like, they were never a big club in the first place, did exactly what Man City did pre FFP, and are continuing down the same track now.

Jesus Christ man James

I should have known there was a scale on these things. If I'm taking Monday off, Paully will be taking Tuesday off

Maybe so, but then you don't even need a leaked document to show who funds and controls PIF and who owns Saudia - one of our recent sponsors. So I'd imagine Man City's lawyers could ask what the difference is and easily snake their way out of the paper trail.

I'm not saying it's about any moral judgement at all, more that it can fairly easily be cited as justification for their actions, I think it has a huge bearing on it tbh. Regardless of whether PIF inject cash into NUFC directly or through a puppet company, the PL's only stipulation was that there must be a demonstrated separation between PIF and the Saudi state - something that's ridiculous, we all know there's no separation. So if the PL can be convinced of that, I'd guess that there's a good chance Man City's lawyers can make the case of there being demonstratable separation between Etihad (for example) and UAE

If they cited that as the reason we failed the owners test (regardless of whether it's legit - with the real reason being the BEIN piracy issues in SA), then we 'passed it' because it was demonstrated there was a separation, it's very easy for Man City's lawyers to cite that case and say "you had no problem with this, what's the difference?" and for the PL to have very little come back imo.

The PIF 'demonstrated' to the PL that there was a separation in ownership between PIF and the Saudi State, despite PIF being owned, managed, and funded by the Saudi State. How on earth are they going do anything to Man City? They've set a precedent for signing off on corruption.

* Ed from Shawn of the Dead signalling E S L with his hands *

It's often the only way things like this are brought closer to home. If you consumed all news stories with the gravity that they should be you'd go insane pretty quickly.

Clubs make barely anything from actual shirt sales. Unless Silverstone manages to strike a deal like the one Liverpool has with Nike.

Red doesn't clash with black and white. We should just toss a coin over who has to wear white socks.

Literally did mate, right here below in bold. Ashworth's Brighton model is the one we're following, so let's hope you end up liking it.

As I said in my OP re Leicester, pre covid. They couldn't have seen that coming. Don't forget that the entire reason PIF exists is because they're fucked when the oil's gone. Doesn't apply to Brighton either.