Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  On 02/09/2010 at 14:59, Dave said:

I don't see what was wrong with what he said tbh. Obviously getting into the multi-talented Brazil squad is harder for a Brazilian than getting into the wanky Honduras squad is for a Honduran.

Yeah but Palacios will never get the chance to get called up to Brazil so you cannot compare the 2.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2010 at 15:01, geordieboy91 said:

  Quote

I don't see what was wrong with what he said tbh. Obviously getting into the multi-talented Brazil squad is harder for a Brazilian than getting into the wanky Honduras squad is for a Honduran.

Yeah but Palacios will never get the chance to get called up to Brazil so you cannot compare the 2.

 

He never said he could. I must be missing something here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2010 at 14:40, Village Idiot said:

Makes me wonder who is the best player that never played for a "big" country?

 

Puskas? Although Hungary was big back then.

 

Dalglish, Souness, Law, Jinky Johnstone were all top class players in their day from my country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest palnese
  On 02/09/2010 at 15:32, colinmk said:

  Quote

Makes me wonder who is the best player that never played for a "big" country?

 

Puskas? Although Hungary was big back then.

 

Dalglish, Souness, Law, Jinky Johnstone were all top class players in their day from my country.

 

Giggs, George Best, Liam Brady, Abedi Pele, Kanchelskis,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2010 at 14:59, Dave said:

I don't see what was wrong with what he said tbh. Obviously getting into the multi-talented Brazil squad is harder for a Brazilian than getting into the wanky Honduras squad is for a Honduran.

 

Stop being so sensible Dave.

 

Paulo Wanchope had many international caps. Case closed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2010 at 16:27, Tooj said:

What are we using as a definition of "big" country?

 

I don't know to be frank. Reach a WC final?

 

Gives us:

 

Uruguay

Argentina

Italy

Brazil

Czechoslovakia

Germany

Hungary

Sweden

Netherlands

England

France

Spain

 

which looks like a decent list.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2010 at 15:02, Dave said:

  Quote

  Quote

I don't see what was wrong with what he said tbh. Obviously getting into the multi-talented Brazil squad is harder for a Brazilian than getting into the wanky Honduras squad is for a Honduran.

Yeah but Palacios will never get the chance to get called up to Brazil so you cannot compare the 2.

 

He never said he could. I must be missing something here.

 

Because he's saying that Sandro MUST be better than Palacios simply because he plays for Brazil. Everyone is quite rightly making the point that the best player from one country (ie Ghana) can quite easily be better than an average one from another (ie Spain) so it's a pointless comparison.

 

Surely you understand that? :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2010 at 16:43, Minister Babatunde ‽ said:

You can't really consider the top African, Asian, and North American teams to be "small" nations when they have players throughout all of the top leagues and are consistently in big tournaments. Especially in the current, I would hardly consider Hungary to be better than these teams.

 

I'm not saying they are "small", just not great in terms of achievement at the highest possible stage. And the 1950s Hungary team is one of the most influential of all time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2010 at 16:47, Shearergol said:

  Quote

  Quote

  Quote

I don't see what was wrong with what he said tbh. Obviously getting into the multi-talented Brazil squad is harder for a Brazilian than getting into the wanky Honduras squad is for a Honduran.

Yeah but Palacios will never get the chance to get called up to Brazil so you cannot compare the 2.

 

He never said he could. I must be missing something here.

 

Because he's saying that Sandro MUST be better than Palacios simply because he plays for Brazil. Everyone is quite rightly making the point that the best player from one country (ie Ghana) can quite easily be better than an average one from another (ie Spain) so it's a pointless comparison.

 

Surely you understand that? :D

 

Link?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2010 at 16:49, Minister Babatunde ‽ said:

To be fair, a limited player like Palacios would be nowhere near Brazil's team. Sandro's probably only there because he's yute anyway.

 

Dunga's Brazil would have had him, in my opinion. Of course I don't watch him as often as a Spurs supporter but he impressed me in the midfield destroyer role last season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 02/09/2010 at 16:52, Dave said:

  Quote

  Quote

  Quote

  Quote

I don't see what was wrong with what he said tbh. Obviously getting into the multi-talented Brazil squad is harder for a Brazilian than getting into the wanky Honduras squad is for a Honduran.

Yeah but Palacios will never get the chance to get called up to Brazil so you cannot compare the 2.

 

He never said he could. I must be missing something here.

 

Because he's saying that Sandro MUST be better than Palacios simply because he plays for Brazil. Everyone is quite rightly making the point that the best player from one country (ie Ghana) can quite easily be better than an average one from another (ie Spain) so it's a pointless comparison.

 

Surely you understand that? :D

 

Link?

 

  Quote
but regular call ups to the Brazil squad suggests more ability than Palacios getting called up for Honduras.

 

Are you quibbling about the use of the word "suggests"? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...