Interpolic Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Liverpool spokesman has rubbished it: http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/294741/Andy-Carroll-not-offered-Newcastle-return- Article is from this morning/afternoon. Admittedly I never realised that since I did a quick search on Google News when I got in, but so what? What's changed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Would love to see him back tbh. Should never have left and I firmly believe playing for Newcastle would give him another 30% to his game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 On RAWKKK they're saying they should get Torres back if we sign Carroll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 I'd take him. Way better than Ameobi x 2, Løvenkrands and Best. £15M seems high, but not when you look at the circumstances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 On RAWKKK they're saying they should get Torres back if we sign Carroll I'm not surprised given they will be given £5m to sign Torres if they sell Carroll for £10m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 On RAWKKK they're saying they should get Torres back if we sign Carroll They're also saying 'Tiote and Cabaye and you have a deal'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 On RAWKKK they're saying they should get Torres back if we sign Carroll They're also saying 'Tiote and Cabaye and you have a deal'. Can't tell if that means they rate Carroll that highly or they think Tiote and Cabaye are terrible . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 I'd take him. Way better than Ameobi x 2, Løvenkrands and Best. £15M seems high, but not when you look at the circumstances. Or we could sign Erding, Rhodes and Ridgewell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Though this is the one player I could see Ashley paying about £15m for, mainly as a massive "told you so" to those who slammed him for selling for £35m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Some of them suggesting it's just News International trying to unsettle them the day before a big game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 I'd take him. Way better than Ameobi x 2, Løvenkrands and Best. £15M seems high, but not when you look at the circumstances. Or we could sign Erding, Rhodes and Ridgewell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 On RAWKKK they're saying they should get Torres back if we sign Carroll They're also saying 'Tiote and Cabaye and you have a deal'. Can't tell if that means they rate Carroll that highly or they think Tiote and Cabaye are terrible . They're just being annoying Liverpool fans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
eliassenfredrik Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 I'd take him. Way better than Ameobi x 2, Løvenkrands and Best. £15M seems high, but not when you look at the circumstances. Or we could sign Erding, Rhodes and Ridgewell. Indeed, but that wont happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Though this is the one player I could see Ashley paying about £15m for, mainly as a massive "told you so" to those who slammed him for selling for £35m. either that or Ashley is just trolling them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Looking at it from a completely objective point of view: Would you want to spend fifteen million big ones on an unfit, out of form player who seems to come hand in hand with off-field bother? It makes no sense at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 I'd take him. Way better than Ameobi x 2, Løvenkrands and Best. £15M seems high, but not when you look at the circumstances. Or we could sign Erding, Rhodes and Ridgewell. Dunno about that. Unsure about Erdinc and Ridgewell is no better than Williamson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Looking at it from a completely objective point of view: Would you want to spend fifteen million big ones on an unfit, out of form player who seems to come hand in hand with off-field bother? It makes no sense at all. Exactly. More than likely he'd come back here, and just end up going out on the lash all of the time with his mates. As he's now set for life, and he's already proven he's not the most motivated professional, so why should we bother? For me, if I'd have had that price-tag to live up to, I'd be busting a gut to prove that I was worth every penny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 The Prophet and tooj have nailed it for me there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 On RAWKKK they're saying they should get Torres back if we sign Carroll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 £5m and we'll sit and talk about the possibility Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 This will be total bullshit. Why on earth would Ashley take a player back that tried to get more money out of him just after he'd agreed a new contract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 I'd take him. Way better than Ameobi x 2, Løvenkrands and Best. £15M seems high, but not when you look at the circumstances. Or we could sign Erding, Rhodes and Ridgewell. Dunno about that. Unsure about Erdinc and Ridgewell is no better than Williamson. I'm unsure about Carroll tbh, some say he is probably homesick and to be honest I can see that but as The Prophet and tooj have nailed it for me there. that goes I also agree. Carroll is as much a risk as anyone, when he was here he was brilliant and he had the 'local lad, our number 9, will be here forever, why would a young lad playing for his local club earning as much in a week as most do in a year ever want to leave' factor but he hasn't been brilliant for a long time now, it wasn't even that long a period at the top level and the local hero stuff was proved bullshit when he left us at the first chance he got. Would rather trust our scouting network and sign other players who are gambles but no more than Carroll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest taps01 Posted January 10, 2012 Share Posted January 10, 2012 Didn't Liverpool do a similar thing with robbie keane ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 On RAWKKK they're saying they should get Torres back if we sign Carroll :lol: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted January 11, 2012 Share Posted January 11, 2012 I'd take him. Way better than Ameobi x 2, Løvenkrands and Best. £15M seems high, but not when you look at the circumstances. Or we could sign Erding, Rhodes and Ridgewell. Rather have Carroll. Ridgwell man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts