Jump to content

West Ham agree fee in region of £15m with Liverpool for Andy Carroll


Pilko
[[Template core/global/global/poll is throwing an error. This theme may be out of date. Run the support tool in the AdminCP to restore the default theme.]]

Recommended Posts

Guest BlacknWhiteArmy

Fantastic............

Back to the 4-4-2. POOOOO

 

4-4-2 was always going to be our main formation I reckon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

Mark Douglas ‏@MsiDouglas

Incredible development at ‪#nufc‬. Approach made for Carroll after de Jong interest fell through. Getting more for ‪#thejournal‬ tomorrow...

6:59 PM - 15 Jul 12

 

Not a replacement for Ba or Cisse then. Fuck the doomongers.

 

Yeah you daft cunts......:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount of games we'll be playing next season, should this go through I don't have any issue with him starting up-top in a 4-4-2. The 4-4-3 isn't gonna suit against every side we face, nor will the Dembas be able to start every match.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount of games we'll be playing next season, should this go through I don't have any issue with him starting up-top in a 4-4-2. The 4-4-3 isn't gonna suit against every side we face, nor will the Dembas be able to start every match.

 

Not only that, but we need to play a goalkeeper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic............

Back to the 4-4-2. POOOOO

 

4-4-2 was always going to be our main formation I reckon.

 

Unfortunately I partly agree, although I don't think we've seen the last of the 4-3-3.  We're definitely going for tactical adaptability. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount of games we'll be playing next season, should this go through I don't have any issue with him starting up-top in a 4-4-2. The 4-4-3 isn't gonna suit against every side we face, nor will the Dembas be able to start every match.

 

Bit too risky playing without a keeper anyway, imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest BlacknWhiteArmy

Fantastic............

Back to the 4-4-2. POOOOO

 

4-4-2 was always going to be our main formation I reckon.

 

Unfortunately I partly agree, although I don't think we've seen the last of the 4-3-3.  We're definitely going for tactical adaptability. 

 

We'll switch through the game as we usually do, but I think the 4-4-2 will be more common.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

He can be any number he likes except 9, he doesn't deserve that anymore, well not until he earns the right again, and then only after Cisse leaves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount of games we'll be playing next season, should this go through I don't have any issue with him starting up-top in a 4-4-2. The 4-4-3 isn't gonna suit against every side we face, nor will the Dembas be able to start every match.

 

Not only that, but we need to play a goalkeeper.

 

:lol: Fucking Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest henrique

The amount of games we'll be playing next season, should this go through I don't have any issue with him starting up-top in a 4-4-2. The 4-4-3 isn't gonna suit against every side we face, nor will the Dembas be able to start every match.

 

I wish we could play 4-4-3 every game like

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Spiria

Fantastic............

Back to the 4-4-2. POOOOO

 

4-4-2 was always going to be our main formation I reckon.

If we play 4-4-2 I would like an amelioration because hoofball is annoying as fuck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The amount of games we'll be playing next season, should this go through I don't have any issue with him starting up-top in a 4-4-2. The 4-4-3 isn't gonna suit against every side we face, nor will the Dembas be able to start every match.

 

Bit too risky playing without a keeper anyway, imo.

 

Colo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...