Ameritoon Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 If they're making such mistakes, they deserve to go into administration. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Unless the contract of sale has been signed, Pompey have every right to cancel or temporarily postpone the deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 What right do they have to demand more for the player anyway? I'm surprised we agreed to pay 900,000. Considering the situation of the player and the two clubs, we have no reason to overpay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Surely if they agreed a fee with us then there is some paperwork signed to say they'll sell him for that fee. In which case tough s***, morons. Is there anything to stop them from pulling out though, we accepted a bid from West Ham for Dyer then changed our asking price. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 do we want him? just read he hasn't kicked a ball for pompey?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 do we want him? just read he hasn't kicked a ball for pompey?? couldnt play him due to they would owe money for him to watford. and now cant sell him due to money would be owed to watford Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Fuck me, we've gone into dealings with the only club seemingly ran by bigger idiots than ours. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 do we want him? just read he hasn't kicked a ball for pompey?? couldnt play him due to they would owe money for him to watford. and now cant sell him due to money would be owed to watford OMG!!!!!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amir_9 Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 f*** me, we've gone into dealings with the only club seemingly ran by bigger idiots than ours. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macca888 Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 So, is this deal done or not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jong24 Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 not Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mags Serbia Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Not yet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted January 22, 2010 Share Posted January 22, 2010 Likely we won't hear anything tomorrow as we have a game, so could well be Monday before this is tied up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Likely we won't hear anything tomorrow as we have a game, so could well be Monday before this is tied up. if the morons at pompey care to actually read the fine print this time Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 I agree with that, just don't think the additional transfer fee would have made a great deal of difference to his playing time that's all. Based on what though? We don't have any idea what's going on in the managers head nor do we have much of an idea what Portsmouth's situation is other then the obvious financial problems and then being generally shit (at least I don't anyway). What we do know is the fact that he hasn't played tells us zero about the players ability. The only info we really have on him is that he was class at Watford, so we know he's at least a very good Championship player, and that Pompey were willing to offer £3m for him so they believed he's a Premiership player. Hopefully we'll find out if they were right next season Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 So now they want more money because they didn't even realise how much they owed to Watford? Portsmouth are absolutely fucking amazing. They're like a tramp who asks for a certain amount of money, sees the cash in your hand and asks for a bit more so they can get one more can of special brew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 If Portsmouth pull the plug on this deal does that mean they've more or less accepted they will be going bankrupt in which case they won't need to pay their creditors? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 I agree with that, just don't think the additional transfer fee would have made a great deal of difference to his playing time that's all. Based on what though? I just don't think he'd have been keeping Kaboul or Ben Haim out of the team. Just an opinion that's all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 So if it is true that they won't play him as they have to pay, and can't let him come here as they have to pay, surely Williamson could be entitled to take legal action against Portsmouth. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Maybe we pay the deficit and get him for a nominal fee? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 Fucking hell Wonder what wages this player who they can't play and can't sell is on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 The point is, I believe, that they forgot about the sell-on clause we have, hence why I think they're trying to convince Williamson to join us on loan as was the plan before your interest (fucking hope this doesn't happen). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 He's only played 17 games out of League Two in his career ... and he's 26. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 The point is, I believe, that they forgot about the sell-on clause we have, hence why I think they're trying to convince Williamson to join us on loan as was the plan before your interest (fucking hope this doesn't happen). In that case, wouldn't they just be getting us to up our bid so that they recieve the same fee we've offered now plus whatever needs to be paid to Watford? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now