Newcastle Fan Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Good for them tbh, they earned this one.. Still dosn't change the fact that we trashed them 5-1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Hell of a result. It's not like putting 4 past them, of course, but fair dos. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GeordieAce Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 They have really missed Essien and Lampard today Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 no offence, but this has nothing to do with sunderland because any team in the WORLD could've won this match. this is all about chelsea's dramatic collapse. decimated by injuries, in poor form, a subs bench resembling a school trip......they never looked bothered. if they cared, they'd have won this. when you take off malouda after 55 minutes, theres something seriously wrong there. Sorry but you sound like a mackem whenever Newcastle win. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 no offence, but this has nothing to do with sunderland because any team in the WORLD could've won this match. this is all about chelsea's dramatic collapse. decimated by injuries, in poor form, a subs bench resembling a school trip......they never looked bothered. if they cared, they'd have won this. when you take off malouda after 55 minutes, theres something seriously wrong there. Still 3-0 at Stamford Bridge is a great result, especially for a side who to me have very few quality players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Sunderland winning 3-0 against Chelsea, and Sky Sports keep mentioning their 5-1 lost against us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Chelsea will be after revenge in the reverse fixture , that's the only positive of that result. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobby_solano Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 We'll never hear the end of this. Thanks chelsea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Amazing result for the Mackems, not many of them there to enjoy it mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 I suppose Sunderland 'got lucky' as in Chelsea are unlikely to turn up and play so abysmally for a long, long time, but they played perfectly today. This result doesn't make me think Sunderland are a good team but they were more than worthy of that scoreline. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Nee Poppy on their shirt today like. Why is this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuv Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Nee Poppy on their shirt today like. Why is this? Niall Quinn probabaly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Nee Poppy on their shirt today like. Why is this? Didn't want to offend their Irish fans apparently, that and they hate our freedoms. Nah, dunno, just as likely to be incompetence with them lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 From BBC Text: From Mackem Stu, on text: "A quick poll around pub in Sunderland - would you swap this possible win with a draw against Newcastle three weeks ago? Answer was a resounding 'yes' - almost bewilderment here with this performance." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 From BBC Text: From Mackem Stu, on text: "A quick poll around pub in Sunderland - would you swap this possible win with a draw against Newcastle three weeks ago? Answer was a resounding 'yes' - almost bewilderment here with this performance." Kind of sad really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 From BBC Text: From Mackem Stu, on text: "A quick poll around pub in Sunderland - would you swap this possible win with a draw against Newcastle three weeks ago? Answer was a resounding 'yes' - almost bewilderment here with this performance." Pitiful wankers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 From BBC Text: From Mackem Stu, on text: "A quick poll around pub in Sunderland - would you swap this possible win with a draw against Newcastle three weeks ago? Answer was a resounding 'yes' - almost bewilderment here with this performance." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=540109 after beating the champions, they fill thier board up with anti toon threads. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=540109 after beating the champions, they fill thier board up with anti toon threads. To be fair there are only 3 obvious threads about us, that's an improvement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Full credit to them tbh.They deserved it,Chelsea looked like a relegation team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 We'll always be their yardstick. It's embarrassing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gash Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 3 points, i could understand, but not 1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Y'know... We keep talking about how bent getting injured would f*** them. Be careful what you wish for, because it could actually save them. It would force Bruce to experiment with formations and maybe find something more reliable than this comfort zone 4-5-1 he's clinging onto for dear life, which at the moment gambles on Bent being on form and one of those hoofs coming off. Even when it's worked, it's looked less than convincing. Some of our best tactics and pairings have come from necessity, a line up we've gone for because of injuries or because of needing to tailor our squad around the best players we have available and then going "Wait a sec, we're onto something here." An out of form but fully fit Bent leading to the continuation of Bruce playing 5 in midfield, when his midfeild is pretty f***ing gash and he should be playing as few of them as possible, with much of their talent on the bench because they don't fit in around the undroppable one, could be preferable to a spell on the sidelines for Mr Benty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 3 points, i could understand, but not 1. I can see where they're coming from tbh - it wasn't just a defeat, they got hammered off their local rivals 5-1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted November 14, 2010 Share Posted November 14, 2010 Worst Chelsea performance since Roman came over, but Sunderland were superb. Could have ended 5-0 and against 10-men and Chelsea couldn't have had any arguments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts