Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looks like it's not just the Chelsea strip, but anything Adidas considers "premium".

 

The high street sports retailer Sports Direct is embroiled in a spat with Adidas which means it could lose out on sales of football kits worn by Chelsea and World Cup favourites including Spain next year.

 

Concerns about the dispute contributed to a 12.5% slump in Sports Direct's share price yesterday, making it the biggest faller in the FTSE 100.The retailer's stock dived 97p to 674p, as it also revealed slightly-lower-than-hoped-for profits after a £6.3m hit from restructuring costs at its new Republic chain as well as a cautious outlook for the next few months.

 

Adidas said in a statement that it would not sell premium-priced football kits, such as Chelsea's strip, through Sports Direct from next spring, citing factors such as "in-store environment" and "customer service levels."

 

Although how much 'customer service' you need to buy a football shirt, I dunno.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do SD sell those shirts cheaper than the Chelsea club shop and other outlets?

 

Edit, quick look, £39.99 from their Club Shop, £44.99 at SD. Surprised at that mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Still intersting look at the table...if the data is correct of course.

 

Well the attendances for all home games in those two years looks about right, the profits match so fwiw they should be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Man City losing 83 quid for every ticket sold stands out mind - ridiculous situation.

 

The £400m or whatever deal they signed will help a bit. The debts are £100m less in 2012/13 than 2010/11. Still absolutely mental mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Man City owner subside tickets for Man City fans.

 

Newcastle fans subside $$ for Newcastle owner.

 

Know which camp i would rather be in

 

As the 2nd camp(on the basis in question) doesnt exist i dont blame you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Not sure I understand.

 

My point is. According to the article we pay £9 more per ticket than what is required to break even.

 

So our £9 is going in to owners pockets.

 

 

Unless im reading it wrong

 

The entire premise in that table revolves around the Andy carroll sale.

 

Edit: And  :lol: at the idea Ashley with piles of £9 coins off each fan waddling to the bank, pockets full

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Not referring to this article in particular, but The Mag could do itself a favour by insisting on would be bloggers having a GCSE in English and perhaps just an iota of common sense before it lets them loose on their site.

It really is a regular pile of shite.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Not referring to this article in particular, but The Mag could do itself a favour by insisting on would be bloggers having a GCSE in English and perhaps just an iota of common sense before it lets them loose on their site.

It really is a regular pile of s****.

 

hahaha!

 

It's not the best. All i want to know is whoever worked this out, how they done it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...