Jump to content

Dogawful Officiating


Guest YANKEEBLEEDSMAGPIE

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

A ‘subjective decision’ apparently.

 

It hit 2 Forrest players ffs, up there with the Palace call.


I genuinely don’t understand it. Two of their players played the ball in a deliberate action, what happened to phases of play? I’ve seen goals given where a stretching defending brushes the ball and an offside player is now given on and scores, how come it doesn’t work the other way round?

 

Totally against the principle of offside which is a whole different conversation just like the mess that is the handball law currently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Disco said:


I genuinely don’t understand it. Two of their players played the ball in a deliberate action, what happened to phases of play? I’ve seen goals given where a stretching defending brushes the ball and an offside player is now given on and scores, how come it doesn’t work the other way round?

 

Totally against the principle of offside.

What is worse, is that both touches from the Forest players completely changed the direction of the ball. It went from going towards goal, to going out for a corner, to being hit towards Isak.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still can't believe what I've seen tonight from that baldy little Wish Iniesta looking cunt and whichever noncy little wankstain was the VAR.

 

However, the fact it's happened in a game that we still managed to get the points takes the edge off a lot. Still hope we kick up a fuss, mind, so it doesn't happen again (until next season).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...