gbandit Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 That post from another board (pine barrens') is eloquent but biased. There is a good point in it though, I do think there is a level of hatred stemming from the mackems which is absurdly over-the-top and they fuel the aggressive side more than we do simply because they hate us whereas we dislike/are bemused by them. You do worry that one day some young chav will do something stupid but I think it could happen on either side, kids can be idiots and do things just to show off. Wish there wasn't a thuggish element to the rivalry at all but it would take both sets of fans to back off and stop baiting each other at all which will never happen. See you next season Sunderland where I hope we win and I hope just as much that both sets of fans don't lose their heads. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Foluwashola Then Mauled Smelly Gangrenous Bastards ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magpie418 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 That post from another board (pine barrens') is eloquent but biased. I see he sneaked the legendary removal van in there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest VegasToon Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Fucking Brilliant! I have been busy with work and was just able to catch up on the news. I can't believe O'Neill is already obsessed with us. "In summary then, Martin O'Neill arranged a Press conference to specifically say #nufc were dirtier than #safc and safc bossed the game.." :spit: :mackems: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 King Al still rattles mackems! (apologies if already posted) Sunderland fans ringing the Strawberry before the derby at privilege 1-1 4/3/12 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 It's ridiculous what RTG has turned into since Sunday. I didn't think they could find another level of complete mongitude but they've really turned it up way past 11. Probably at about 37 at the minute. That vid as well man Typical mackem mentality, ignore even basic facts because if you say it enough, it will become true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varadi Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 The 2 teams are on opposite trajectories now - they've had their spell as the self-appointed NETD and this was the last derby in a while they'll be in with a decent shout of beating us. O'Neill's actions are an embarrassment, but as others have said he clearly knows his audience as calling a press conference specifically to slate Newcastle will be lapped up by the SMBs - will probably become a weekly event! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/oneill-reopens-war-of-words-with-newcastle-7542392.html Martin O'Neill has reignited his row with Alan Pardew, questioning the Newcastle manager's accusation that Sunderland had been overly physical in a tempestuous Tyne-Wear derby last Sunday. Two players were sent off for the visitors and eight players from both teams were shown yellow cards. Andy Woodman, the Newcastle goalkeeping coach, was sent to the stands at half-time in a volatile game. "The half-time stats are a total contradiction to what their manager said," O'Neill claimed yesterday. "They've twice the number of bookings we have, and twice as many fouls. You think you've watched the game, given a reasonable analysis, and then you hear the opposition manager saying that Sunderland had a game plan to upset them, to unnerve them, to basically – and he used the word 'ugly' – attempt to kick them off the pitch. "Lee Cattermole was booked after a minute and a half and quite rightly so too. The second foul was committed by ourselves when [Jonas] Gutierrez goes by Seb Larsson and Phil Bardsley after three and a half minutes. "We didn't commit another foul then for about 17 minutes, during which time they conceded seven. It's not a case of taking the moral high ground, but putting across what I felt during the course of the game was almost entirely the opposite of what their manager was saying." O'Neill also questioned Cheick Tioté's part in the dismissal of Stéphane Sessègnon. "Sessègnon deserved to be sent off the pitch, because he raised his arm in retaliation," added O'Neill. "He's flung an arm back in the manner that, if the referee sees, he has no option but to send him off. Tioté, this 'hard man' of the Premier League, has clutched part of his anatomy that was not even touched. He's gone down two and a half seconds after the incident, and rolled around 14 times." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Pint of bitter with that Martin? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 He'll be telling us what song he's got planned next. Obsessed with us already, probably trying to justify his "one of us" credentials by fitting in with the rest of them. Fucking leprechaun cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 There's something about that city that makes people who live there just as thick as the natives. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 There's something about that city that makes people who live there just as thick as the natives. Students at Sunderland Uni where advised NOT to enter the town centre at a weekend or a Wednesday night to socialise. I taight a lot of Asian, Black Uni students and they all pretty much suggested they suffer racism on a regular basis. More than once I witnessed it myself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Earlier this season, Sunderland midfielder David Meyler was criticised by Tony Pulis for his reaction to a challenge from Stoke centre-half Robert Huth that led to the latter's dismissal. However, O'Neill was convinced his player Meyler reacted appropriately to the tackle, whereas Ivory Coast international Tiote did not on Sunday. "I had a disagreement with Tony Pulis in the sense that he picked out an incident where Huth was sent off because he had fouled Meyler, and his after-match comment was that he thought too much of this was creeping into the game, where players are getting other players sent off. "I actually agreed with him, but I felt he had chosen the wrong subject this time in David Meyler. "This would be the type of thing Tony Pulis would be referring to, and that is not at all exonerating Sessegnon. He will be fined accordingly as will Cattermole," O'Neill added. So basically Martin, it's ok for your players to over react but not players of other teams? Nice to see he's developed the Mackem delusion already. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 BAM, MON'g has been sucked in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Nguyen Van Falk Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=679541 I think after hearing about these events we should award them the victory and 3 points. Jesus, do they have no depth to which they will sink to to claim a moral victory? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 They will be worse next season, after a summer window where he fills the team with even more cloggers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Was it against sunderland that our mascot got ripped to shreds on RTG for having a laugh? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Was it against sunderland that our mascot got ripped to shreds on RTG for having a laugh? Aye, that kid last season before the 5-1, who scored the goal in the warm up and did the 'heart' hand gesture to the crowd etc. http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/blogs/football-banter/Watch-Newcastle-s-cocky-kid-mascot-Jack-McBride-duck-invades-pitch-in-Belgium-and-is-thrown-off-by-in-Zulte-Waregem-s-Mahamadou-Habib-and-Porto-s-Fernando-Belluschi-shopws-off-tekkers-and-skills-in-the-rain-in-3PM-Extra-video-round-up-Thursday-October-28-article618097.html They hated it more because Sky (Magedia) made a big thing of him. Seems only one or two actually saw this Mackem mascot and his 'stunt'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 He honestly called a press conference just to talk about us? What a bloody idiot. Let's hope that by next season we've got a team looking to play a bit of football and we'll blow these lot away twice, our recruitment is already streets ahead of theirs and they'll bring in more old men. Ironically enough if O' Neill wasn't so shit in the transfer Market they'd be celebrating 3 points because Bridge was completely at fault for our goal. Twats man, I just want them to fuck off now, even though we get points from them every year they're such an irritating bunch of cave men I can't be arsed with them anymore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Was it against sunderland that our mascot got ripped to shreds on RTG for having a laugh? Aye, that kid last season before the 5-1, who scored the goal in the warm up and did the 'heart' hand gesture to the crowd etc. They hated it more because Sky (Magedia) made a big thing of him. Seems only one or two actually saw this Mackem mascot and his 'stunt'. Thought so, do those fucking morons try and contradict everything they say/do or is it a hilarious side-effect of inbreeding? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 He could have been successful but he has been drawn in, he'll be gone in 18 months. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Wait, O'Neill's completely rattled and obsessed already? Sensational. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Didn't even take a defeat to break him. Poor little tracksuit pogoing wanker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Wally_McFool Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 Imagine if that had been the SoL on Sunday btw and Campbell and got the injury-time equaliser. Pitch invasion, the lot would have happened. That scenario would be a "class reaction" and a well deserved point. Shola's late goal scenario = "bunch of classless jammy mag bastards" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted March 7, 2012 Share Posted March 7, 2012 http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/oneill-reopens-war-of-words-with-newcastle-7542392.html Martin O'Neill has reignited his row with Alan Pardew, questioning the Newcastle manager's accusation that Sunderland had been overly physical in a tempestuous Tyne-Wear derby last Sunday. Two players were sent off for the visitors and eight players from both teams were shown yellow cards. Andy Woodman, the Newcastle goalkeeping coach, was sent to the stands at half-time in a volatile game. "The half-time stats are a total contradiction to what their manager said," O'Neill claimed yesterday. "They've twice the number of bookings we have, and twice as many fouls. You think you've watched the game, given a reasonable analysis, and then you hear the opposition manager saying that Sunderland had a game plan to upset them, to unnerve them, to basically – and he used the word 'ugly' – attempt to kick them off the pitch. "Lee Cattermole was booked after a minute and a half and quite rightly so too. The second foul was committed by ourselves when [Jonas] Gutierrez goes by Seb Larsson and Phil Bardsley after three and a half minutes. "We didn't commit another foul then for about 17 minutes, during which time they conceded seven. It's not a case of taking the moral high ground, but putting across what I felt during the course of the game was almost entirely the opposite of what their manager was saying." O'Neill also questioned Cheick Tioté's part in the dismissal of Stéphane Sessègnon. "Sessègnon deserved to be sent off the pitch, because he raised his arm in retaliation," added O'Neill. "He's flung an arm back in the manner that, if the referee sees, he has no option but to send him off. Tioté, this 'hard man' of the Premier League, has clutched part of his anatomy that was not even touched. He's gone down two and a half seconds after the incident, and rolled around 14 times." Not only is his opinion completely and laughably wrong, he can't even get the facts right - it was 30 seconds in, man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts