Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Parker had his moments in that position for sure, but I just didn't like his style.

 

A lot of times it was quite laboured, and he slowed down play. He'd spin and spin and spin, or play it too safe too often with the backwards and sideways stuff. He wasn't consistently good at it.

 

At Spurs he had Modric alongside him I believe, who took a lot of the responsibility of initiating play, and really was quite outstanding at it.

 

Ultimately with this kind of player (Modric) also playing deep alongside him then it works quite well. At Fulham they have Sidwell with him, and that is going to be a disaster. While he was here, Emre couldn't stay fit enough to partner him regularly, and it all eventually started going down hill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Parker had his moments in that position for sure, but I just didn't like his style.

 

A lot of times it was quite laboured, and he slowed down play. He'd spin and spin and spin, or play it too safe too often with the backwards and sideways stuff. He wasn't consistently good at it.

 

At Spurs he had Modric alongside him I believe, who took a lot of the responsibility of initiating play, and really was quite outstanding at it.

 

Ultimately with this kind of player (Modric) also playing deep alongside him then it works quite well. At Fulham they have Sidwell with him, and that is going to be a disaster. While he was here, Emre couldn't stay fit enough to partner him regularly, and it all eventually started going down hill.

 

I don't think that really takes enough into account. For one, when Emre was fit, we had a manager that thought it would be a good idea to have Emre sitting deep and Parker being the attacking threat. :lol:

 

As for the point about Modric, I agree, but it's all about the balance between players and how they compliment each other. Parker and Sidwell sounds terrible, but Parker and a player like Arteta or Modric or Alonso and it works. He's basically a wingman for a better midfielder, and he's decent at it, imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parker had his moments in that position for sure, but I just didn't like his style.

 

A lot of times it was quite laboured, and he slowed down play. He'd spin and spin and spin, or play it too safe too often with the backwards and sideways stuff. He wasn't consistently good at it.

 

At Spurs he had Modric alongside him I believe, who took a lot of the responsibility of initiating play, and really was quite outstanding at it.

 

Ultimately with this kind of player (Modric) also playing deep alongside him then it works quite well. At Fulham they have Sidwell with him, and that is going to be a disaster. While he was here, Emre couldn't stay fit enough to partner him regularly, and it all eventually started going down hill.

 

I don't think that really takes enough into account. For one, when Emre was fit, we had a manager that thought it would be a good idea to have Emre sitting deep and Parker being the attacking threat. :lol:

 

As for the point about Modric, I agree, but it's all about the balance between players and how they compliment each other. Parker and Sidwell sounds terrible, but Parker and a player like Arteta or Modric or Alonso and it works. He's basically a wingman for a better midfielder, and he's decent at it, imo.

 

Ah, yes! Forgot about that from Roeder :lol:

 

Eeerily similar, in some ways, to Pardew's Tiote experiment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Parker had his moments in that position for sure, but I just didn't like his style.

 

A lot of times it was quite laboured, and he slowed down play. He'd spin and spin and spin, or play it too safe too often with the backwards and sideways stuff. He wasn't consistently good at it.

 

At Spurs he had Modric alongside him I believe, who took a lot of the responsibility of initiating play, and really was quite outstanding at it.

 

Ultimately with this kind of player (Modric) also playing deep alongside him then it works quite well. At Fulham they have Sidwell with him, and that is going to be a disaster. While he was here, Emre couldn't stay fit enough to partner him regularly, and it all eventually started going down hill.

 

Forget the style, he was effective. Parker did all the donkey work even if it meant running instead of using positional knowledge.

 

one thing I liked about redknapp is that he keeps the game simple. Parker got the ball and passed it to one of the more creative and talented players. With Modric alongside he would just give him the ball.

 

He was a regular in a side that beat Inter, AC, went to the CL QF, finished 4th, 5th, 4th. To say he wasn't consistently good is ludicrous. Claude Makelele would struggle alongside Steve Sidwell.. what's your point? Parker's good at doing the legwork for more talented players, winning the ball and laying it off. Things went wrong for him here when he was the man we looked to, to dictate play. He's not that guy. People thought Modric would struggle as a real CM in this division and I honestly believe having a work-horse like Parker really helped him (at least at the beginning) adjust to life at CM in the PL.

 

Parker's reliance on stamina/running also means he's fallen off with age.

 

Would Spurs have finished 4th, 5th, 4th with the current Anita? I doubt it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

True say bro. Some fair points.

 

Just love Vurnon in our current setup, and fail to see how that dumpling guy can't recognise what he brings to the team.

 

Don't want to come across as a Parker hater, because he's a top pro and gives his all. Was just trying to make the point that blood and thunder does not mean a better or more effective player necessarily.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've seen so far this season, there's something about Anita that just gives us a certain level of calmness in midfield. The way he just keeps it simple with his passing and his uncomplicated play in DM sits just about right in the current system. There will be continuous questions as to his physical stature but as it stands, he's a starter for me. No doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've seen so far this season, there's something about Anita that just gives us a certain level of calmness in midfield. The way he just keeps it simple with his passing and his uncomplicated play in DM sits just about right in the current system. There will be continuous questions as to his physical stature but as it stands, he's a starter for me. No doubt.

 

Agreed. At the moment he starts and he looks like he's growing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've seen so far this season, there's something about Anita that just gives us a certain level of calmness in midfield. The way he just keeps it simple with his passing and his uncomplicated play in DM sits just about right in the current system. There will be continuous questions as to his physical stature but as it stands, he's a starter for me. No doubt.

 

It's a shame we hadn't signed him last season...  :pardsgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pardew confirming once again that when things aren't going well he hasn't got the bottle to see things through.

 

He really is the Bramble of football management, one thing doesn't go his way and his confidence just goes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

Best player for me, he will be rewarded with a place on the bench at Everton as we will need a tackle after today. Alan's diary entry 21/09/13. 5.30pm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...