Jump to content

Recommended Posts

One thing about Anita's performance is that he's taken the attention from another anonymous excuse of a performance from Colback with his usual blend of stupid fucking yellow-cards and shit set-pieces.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest DebuchyAndTheBeast

Seriously I don't get it how some people can still defend Anita. Doesn't offer anything apart from some sideway passes and even gives away easy penalties. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's never shown anything at Newcastle to suggest he's a good player. Some people literally only rate him because he played for Ajax...

I thought it was more because he actually has looked good if not outstanding in the past for us, and they wanted to see more of him.

 

We've seen more of him over the past couple of seasons and he's obviously not a great player, the conversation now is whether he's better than Jack Colback.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's never shown anything at Newcastle to suggest he's a good player. Some people literally only rate him because he played for Ajax...

I thought it was more because he actually has looked good if not outstanding in the past for us, and they wanted to see more of him.

 

We've seen more of him over the past couple of seasons and he's obviously not a great player, the conversation now is whether he's better than Jack Colback.

 

He's not.  He's about on par with Billy Askew.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He looked good in the limited number of games he got when he first arrived. But then Pardew and his 'coaches' got to work their magic on him.

 

It's no surprise he's ended up the broken player he is now. How are you supposed to progress as a player if you don't play? How are you supposed to progress when also-rans such as Steve Stone and Carver are coaching you along with Pardew. Can you imagine the kind of things they will have been saying to him?

 

He looks shocking at the moment no doubt but I find it hard to blame him. I don't think he's innately a bad player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He looked good in the limited number of games he got when he first arrived. But then Pardew and his 'coaches' got to work their magic on him.

 

It's no surprise he's ended up the broken player he is now. How are you supposed to progress as a player if you don't play? How are you supposed to progress when also-rans such as Steve Stone and Carver are coaching you along with Pardew. Can you imagine the kind of things they will have been saying to him?

 

He looks shocking at the moment no doubt but I find it hard to blame him. I don't think he's innately a bad player.

 

He is clearly not a bad player, as Ronaldo says he isn't physical enough to cope. He did however look fantastic for us late last year when given a run in the team and was even an attacking threat. A midfield enforcer he certainly isnt though. He is best at work tidying up and connecting play but unfortunatley he doesnt have the vision of cabaye nor the physicality of tiote to be relied upon as a sole DM. It all depends who he plays alongside imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like him as a player and i'd have him in the side ahead of Colback for sure but if Cabella is fit I don't see where we can fit him in.  While i'd have him in the side ahead of Colback, i'd have Abeid ahead of both of them.  Play Sissoko a bit deeper with Abeid in a two with Abeid sitting.  ReCabs in the no. 10 role with Cisse up top flanked by Perez and Armstrong like this:

 

               

                Cisse

    Perez              Armstrong

              Cabella 

 

        Sissoko  Abeid   

 

Anita would make the bench as cover I suppose but then we also have De Jong to come back (:lol:) pushing him further down the pecking order.

 

Quite simply i don't think Colback, Tiote or Anita are going to make a difference to us at this point, albeit for different reasons, and we should be looking for a quality CM along with a winger and two CBs in the summer as a minimum.

 

 

 

                           

Link to post
Share on other sites

He looked tidy and capable of doing a job when he was more of a "link" between the enforcer (Tiote) and the creative hub (Cabaye). When he's expected to step up and become either of those himself, he's simply not up to it. Doesn't help when he's alongside clobbers such as Perch & Colback in that time, but he's only useful in a three when we have two quality players in those other two roles. Not really enough to justify him being here really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He looked tidy and capable of doing a job when he was more of a "link" between the enforcer (Tiote) and the creative hub (Cabaye). When he's expected to step up and become either of those himself, he's simply not up to it. Doesn't help when he's alongside clobbers such as Perch & Colback in that time, but he's only useful in a three when we have two quality players in those other two roles. Not really enough to justify him being here really.

My opinion of him is fairly similar. Anita isn't necessarily a poor player and he can look fairly good in the right circumstances, but also isn't a top talent, doesn't have the attributes to exert major influence on the match, and has never been suited to NUFC's "way of playing. He should be sold for the betterment of both parties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i don;t think we are even close to using a system that works for him and i'm not wholly sure he's suited to the league. I liked him cos he was technical, good passing range and low centre of gravity but he hasn't pushed on. Even despite testing circumstances of coaches not having faith in him tbh he's not good enough. Not reliable and you need a DM to be reliable more than anything

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't rate him that much, but he's an easy scapgoat for last night. It didn't help that Williamson pointed up the line (like he always does) to signal he was going to hoof it away, then he played a 2cm pass to sell Anita down the swanny :lol:

 

He's also not a 'midfield enforcer' yet was clearly put into that Tiote-like role yesterday to deal with players like Toure - it's like putting Pinocchio up against Andre the Giant ffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't blame him for last night (well he shares some as do most our so called 'defenders'). Mostly it's the coach who seems to inspire absolutely zilch from them. And the club for allowing us to get to this position with the players at the back

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like his way of playing and his technique and I wish I supported a team that played in a style that suits him. But it's kind of irrelevant as it's never going to happen.

 

Putting him, Gouffran and Colback up against Man City's midfield is actual suicide, and then to think it'll be alright as long as the strikers play as extra fullbacks. FFS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...