Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm baffled how people want to lay the blame at the players doors. Our whole team is playing badly, that is 100% at the managers door. It's the last defence of the indefensible I guess

 

Load of nonsense. There's a fair few of us not defending Pardew in any way who also think the players are heavily to blame.

 

Heavily, really?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can blame the players all you like, as a retail manager I can blame my staff if my store is under performing but if my staff aren't performing who do you think my area manager blames? It's my fault they aren't doing there job down to my handling/training of them. Ergo the buck has to stop at the managers door, Pardew has more than capable players in his team, the fact that they aren't performing HAS to be his responsibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd say our squad is as good as most up to the fifth placed team in the league myself.

 

First team possibly, squad no chance.

 

How so? I see all the teams bar Liverpool with youngsters/unproven players on their benches most of the time, same as us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't say anything. Just look at our bench and parts of the starting Xl and concede that your judgement's off a bit.

 

I'd have to say something to do that. But lets go through the squad if we must....

 

Krul - Dutch international

Debuchy - FR int

Mbiwa - FR int

Santon - ITA int

Colo - ARG int

Cabaye - FR Int

Anita - Dutch Int

HBA - FR int

Jonas - Arg int

Sissoko -FR int

Cisse - Senegal Int

 

 

Now thats a snapshot of players. I'll concede the likes of Shola/Willo/Perch/simpson etc aren't top players but not every team has a raft of top players waiting to come on. Its been done to death but look at Swansea/Wba/Anyone up to Liverpool who'd managers would kill for a squad like ours.

 

Take away Anita and Jonas from there and you're left with 9 good (2 or 3 very good) players including only one goalscorer.

 

I don't like doing this in this particular thread because any second one of the usual suspects will turn up, assume it's a defence of Pardew and the thread goes to shit again. I'm just a little fed up of all the pretense. When the next manager comes in and doesn't have them playing like something between Swansea and Barcelona it'll all be his fault, no doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Look at our last european campaign under Roeder, we played more games than this season, we had a much worse injury record that year and yet we finished 13th with Roeder resigning after a 'poor' league showing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love for us to play somewhere between Swansea and Barca, but I'd settle for a bit of pass and move and venturing out of our own area with the ball on the floor, utilising a decent midfield rather than hoofing it to a midget and watching it come back for 70 minutes a game.

 

I want to see us go after a game and not nervously try and cling on to a slender 1-0 for 80-odd minutes!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't say anything. Just look at our bench and parts of the starting Xl and concede that your judgement's off a bit.

 

I'd have to say something to do that. But lets go through the squad if we must....

 

Krul - Dutch international

Debuchy - FR int

Mbiwa - FR int

Santon - ITA int

Colo - ARG int

Cabaye - FR Int

Anita - Dutch Int

HBA - FR int

Jonas - Arg int

Sissoko -FR int

Cisse - Senegal Int

 

 

Now thats a snapshot of players. I'll concede the likes of Shola/Willo/Perch/simpson etc aren't top players but not every team has a raft of top players waiting to come on. Its been done to death but look at Swansea/Wba/Anyone up to Liverpool who'd managers would kill for a squad like ours.

 

Take away Anita and Jonas and you're left with 9 good players including only one goalscorer.

 

I don't like doing this in this particular thread because any second one of the usual suspects will turn up, assume it's a defence of Pardew and the thread goes to s*** again. I'm just a little fed up of all the pretense. When the next manager comes in and doesn't have them playing like something between Swansea and Barcelona it'll all be his fault, no doubt.

 

9 good players in an 11 man team?! Thats pretty good.

 

Also the bold bit, why on earth do you have to polarise it that much? not one person has said that, not one. People just don't want the fucking eye gougingly bad shite we are served up now. If what was posted about the Team Meeting fall out is true, which is plausible, it all points one way

 

It's not pretty good when it represents the whole squad.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a squad outside Manchester/ Chelsea that doesn't have a glaring weakness somewhere or other.  For all the talk of only having Shola and Cisse for example,  our striking options over the entire season have been miles better than,  for example,  Everton and even Spurs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a squad outside Manchester/ Chelsea that doesn't have a glaring weakness somewhere or other.  For all the talk of only having Shola and Cisse for example,  our striking options over the entire season have been miles better than,  for example,  Everton and even Spurs.

 

Everton have Anichebe, Jelavic and Mirallas - we have Cisse and Shola now Ba is gone.

 

EDIT - guess we have Gouffran as well. Still it's arguable which is the better trio and when your throw in Fellaini who was playing up front a fair bit.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a squad outside Manchester/ Chelsea that doesn't have a glaring weakness somewhere or other.  For all the talk of only having Shola and Cisse for example,  our striking options over the entire season have been miles better than,  for example,  Everton and even Spurs.

 

Everton and Spurs have goals in their midfield and defence. Their top scorers come from midfield and both have more goals than Shola and Cisse together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

It's not pretty good when it represents the whole squad.

 

 

 

We've dropped points at home to Villa, did they have a better 1st 11 or squad than us?  We dropped points home and away to Reading, do they?  How about the mackems home and away?  West Ham at home, Brighton away, Stoke away, Swansea at home, Southampton away, Fulham away?

 

I could probably go on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not every team in the league has a first class first 11 and bench, its utterly unrealistic

 

Of course it is. But is it unrealistic to have 2 or 3 players in the squad with proven track records of hitting double figures in a season? All of those chasing top 7 do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love for us to play somewhere between Swansea and Barca, but I'd settle for a bit of pass and move and venturing out of our own area with the ball on the floor, utilising a decent midfield rather than hoofing it to a midget and watching it come back for 70 minutes a game.

 

I want to see us go after a game and not nervously try and cling on to a slender 1-0 for 80-odd minutes!

 

Norwich and Wba play well on the deck with very limited sides. Don't even need Swansea as a yardstick tbh - they are lightyears ahead of us in their general play.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mucha

Neville

Duffy

Oviedo

Barkley

Jelavic

Naismith

 

Everton's bench yesterday.  There's simply no truth in this vast depth that the clubs in the top half supposedly possess.  Obviously they have more goals from midfield -  their midfield is encouraged to get in the opposition box.  We are  apparently not allowed more than three  players at any stage of an attack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

It's not pretty good when it represents the whole squad.

 

 

 

We've dropped points at home to Villa, did they have a better 1st 11 or squad than us?  We dropped points home and away to Reading, do they?  How about the mackems home and away?  West Ham at home, Brighton away, Stoke away, Swansea at home, Southampton away, Fulham away?

 

I could probably go on.

 

I don't like doing this in this particular thread because any second one of the usual suspects will turn up, assume it's a defence of Pardew and the thread goes to shit again

 

Not happening, go away.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

It's not pretty good when it represents the whole squad.

 

 

 

We've dropped points at home to Villa, did they have a better 1st 11 or squad than us?  We dropped points home and away to Reading, do they?  How about the mackems home and away?  West Ham at home, Brighton away, Stoke away, Swansea at home, Southampton away, Fulham away?

 

I could probably go on.

 

I don't like doing this in this particular thread because any second one of the usual suspects will turn up, assume it's a defence of Pardew and the thread goes to s*** again

 

Not happening, go away.

 

:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's definition of a bad season?

 

It's all about context. Similarly to the discussion yesterday regarding "04-05 / 12-13, which was worse?" - it's difficult to define something like this because circumstances vary year on year.

 

However, I feel that this is the worst 'result' from a domestic campaign given the personnel available, since I've supported us. The relegation season was similar. Although it was flawed by personalities, there was bags of quality in that squad. 'On paper', it was one of the best squads that has ever been relegated from the Premier League, imo. That was proved by us losing several players from it, but still utterly humiliating the Championship.

 

Similarly this season - when you consider the talent at the manager's disposal - it's deplorable that we're not even in the top half - never mind part of a relegation battle all season. Our squad belongs in the top 6/7/8.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...