Jump to content

The other games today - 2012/13


Dave

Recommended Posts

Guest firetotheworks

That comment about Gerrard is f***ing staggering. Why are the media so blind to what's right in front of them?

 

They have to stick to their fallacies until they eventually just avoid situations that require an opinion opposed to the ones they've had forever.

 

They do the same with everything. Arsenal are always an attractive team to watch,  Stoke will only ever play route one, even when they aren't, Martinez is a good manager, Redknapp is likeable, Owen will score goals etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That he's not the type to go down unnecessarily.

is there some collective delusion that sets in when you become a pundit/commentator in england where you have to worship at the altars of Steven Gerrard and Wayne Rooney and ignore the fact they cheat all the time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why pundits should never, ever be ex players. It's such a small group of professionals that ultimately they'll be slagging off their mates. At least they should mix it up with a few journalists or just people who know football and speak well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's why pundits should never, ever be ex players. It's such a small group of professionals that ultimately they'll be slagging off their mates. At least they should mix it up with a few journalists or just people who know football and speak well.

aye, one of the things ESPN have done right with their coverage of Serie A and the French League is getting Journos on to pundit the game and who know the league and the players involved rather than just random ex players.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Gary Neville shows that you can be an ex-player pundit, seriously know your stuff and be able to call a spade a spade, provide insight and be critical without going o.t.t in search for ratings or controversy. I don't think it shouldn't be ex-players, it just shouldn't be shit pundits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary Neville shows that you can be an ex-player pundit, seriously know your stuff and be able to call a spade a spade, provide insight and be critical without going o.t.t in search for ratings or controversy. I don't think it shouldn't be ex-players, it just shouldn't be shit pundits.

 

Aye, they just need to be more selective. I quite like Matt Holland in his fleeting appearances for the BBC also.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary Neville shows that you can be an ex-player pundit, seriously know your stuff and be able to call a spade a spade, provide insight and be critical without going o.t.t in search for ratings or controversy. I don't think it shouldn't be ex-players, it just shouldn't be s*** pundits.

 

Tbh Neville is the only one who seems like he actually watches the game and the others just come up with meaningless cliché crap on the go.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary Neville shows that you can be an ex-player pundit, seriously know your stuff and be able to call a spade a spade, provide insight and be critical without going o.t.t in search for ratings or controversy. I don't think it shouldn't be ex-players, it just shouldn't be s*** pundits.

He's easier on England players and Man Utd. players. His style is more analytical and less judgemental/sensational so he can get away with it.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary Neville shows that you can be an ex-player pundit, seriously know your stuff and be able to call a spade a spade, provide insight and be critical without going o.t.t in search for ratings or controversy. I don't think it shouldn't be ex-players, it just shouldn't be s*** pundits.

 

Tbh Neville is the only one who seems like he actually watches the game and the others just come up with meaningless cliché crap on the go.

 

Aye he brings up points from several other games that show he's done his research.

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/22047043

 

Roberto Mancini says Manchester City would still be challenging for the Premier League and Champions League titles had he been able to sign his principal targets last summer.

 

"We would probably be at the top... probably also in a Champions League quarter-final," the City manager said.

 

"We had a chance to get three or four players that would have improved our team but now it is finished with."

 

And he added rivals Manchester United "continued to improve their team".

 

All five top targets identified by Mancini last summer opted against joining City.

 

Those at the top of the Italian's list were understood to include Netherlands striker Robin van Persie, who instead joined Premier League leaders United from Arsenal, and Belgium's Eden Hazard, who signed for Chelsea from French side Lille.

 

Additionally, Athletic Bilbao's Javi Martinez chose Bayern Munich, Daniele De Rossi stayed in Italy with Roma and City refused to meet Liverpool's £27m valuation of Danish centre-half Daniel Agger.

 

However, the Italian still spent £52m last summer on players including Javi Garcia, Matija Nastasic and Jack Rodwell. That was a greater total than Manchester United counterpart Sir Alex Ferguson, whose chief purchase was the £24m capture of Van Persie.

 

"We had the chance to get important players, players that this year could have been the difference in this team," continued Mancini. "But it is useless to talk about this now."

 

Fuck off. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: Weak as piss, but some will buy it.

 

If the joint richest club in the league can't identify an affordable upgrade on Gareth Barry in time Mancini's had, he doesn't deserve to keep his job. You're just shit Mancini.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: Weak as piss, but some will buy it.

 

If the joint richest club in the league can't identify an affordable upgrade on Gareth Barry in time Mancini's had, he doesn't deserve to keep his job. You're just shit Mancini.

 

He isn't shit, to be fair. Largely done a very underwhelming job, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: Weak as piss, but some will buy it.

 

If the joint richest club in the league can't identify an affordable upgrade on Gareth Barry in time Mancini's had, he doesn't deserve to keep his job. You're just shit Mancini.

 

He isn't shit, to be fair. Largely done a very underwhelming job, though.

 

For a team with their resources you don't think it's professionally incompetent to continue to have Gareth Barry as one of the first names on your team sheet? You'd be fuming if it was your team, and rightly so. Relative to where the clubs are at, I'd rate it as being just as bad as having three centre-backs at Newcastle for 18 months (or whatever it was) until MYM got here. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: Weak as p*ss, but some will buy it.

 

If the joint richest club in the league can't identify an affordable upgrade on Gareth Barry in time Mancini's had, he doesn't deserve to keep his job. You're just s*** Mancini.

 

He isn't s***, to be fair. Largely done a very underwhelming job, though.

 

Well he's not a good manager that's for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...