Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've heard he has some serious issues. No other reason he would go from playing for Spain to 4th division in a few seasons.

 

Must be, otherwise it's been an inexplicable fall from grace the last few seasons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The more football I watch (and I watch a lot) the more I think the importance we give to managers/coaches is a myth. It's all about players!</p>— Gary Lineker (@GaryLineker) <a href="https://twitter.com/GaryLineker/status/678574446219776000">December 20, 2015</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

 

Thoughts? I'm not so sure it's players moreso a club and its structure and the environment that fosters. I don't think there's a manager that would come to NUFC that could get us consistently top 8 under Ashley for example. Toxic club. I think any decent PL manager woud do well at a Palace for example. Watford chop and change managers all the time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What he's said is kind of like saying "a war isn't the generals, it's the soldiers!" I mean, yeah, for certain things it absolutely comes down to the individuals and he's correct. But to diminish or toss out altogether the importance of higher level strategic thinking vs tactical is rubbish.

 

And I'd agree the philosophy/environment of the club matters too, but that could be fluid as well, with owners changing etc.

 

Really it's just impossible to pin down how much each contribution matters and it wouldn't be a hard rule anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with Lineker to a certain extent there, especially in the Premier League because it's not as tactical as other leagues. It was proven in that numbers game book that in terms of results there is generally little difference when you change manager. Once a manager picks the best team available to him I believe there is little more he can do in most scenarios

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course its the players who have to perform on the pitch but the manager's job is huge. He has to make sure they're fit, prepared and most importantly, confident! Do you think Leicester would be top if Ranieri wasn't there, Gary?

 

Look at the fall of Man Utd since SAF left. look at us when SBR left. Completely different teams.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The manager, certainly in the traditional sense, is in a position to be the most influential person at the club and in the majority of cases they are imo. You don't have to be Kevin Keegan to contribute in an enormous way. Even those who have less of an imposition on the day-to-day structure of the club are contributing by simply letting the players 'do the talking'. Hughton with us is a good example. He let the players committee happen; it was a positive thing which he was indirectly accountable for. 

 

Who the manager is invariably correlates to the success of a club. Don't agree with Lineker at all really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...