Nobody Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Johnson has confirmed that at this meeting, Margaret Byrne had copies of the footballer's interview transcripts, WhatsApp message exchanges and interviews with the girl and her friends. Reminder, this was in May 2015. fuuuuuuuuuucking hell Fuck me, that's fucking disgusting on Sunderlands part. That's grounds for sacking, never mind a suspension, especially as by then it's been proven that he has used his position as a Sunderland player to do these things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 RTG has a robot that automatically makes threads based on SAFC related news articles which isn't good for their current ban on discussing it http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/footballer-manipulated-girlfriend.1203984/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Fully expect them to scapegoat Margaret Byrne like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Fully expect them to scapegoat Margaret Byrne like. They hate her anyway. Unsurprisingly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Fletcher choosing champagne and croissants over defending his noncey mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Fletcher choosing champagne and croissants over defending his noncey mate Wise decision it looks like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Fully expect them to scapegoat Margaret Byrne like. She has to go after this, surely? Can't help but feel that the PFA are in the wrong here as well. Of course, it's their job to be on the players side, but if they knew as much as Sunderland did and were still pressuring Sunderland to let him play, that doesn't sit right with me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Apparently Fletcher was going to be called to give evidence about Johnson's pubic area. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Fully expect them to scapegoat Margaret Byrne like. She has to go after this, surely? Can't help but feel that the PFA are in the wrong here as well. Of course, it's their job to be on the players side, but if they knew as much as Sunderland did and were still pressuring Sunderland to let him play, that doesn't sit right with me. Lets get this right though, regardless of pressure from the PFA Sunderland AFC decided to un-suspend and play someone who they had evidence of being engaged in inappropriate activity with a child. They can squirm all they like and call Johnson a liar but they are the facts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Fully expect them to scapegoat Margaret Byrne like. She has to go after this, surely? Can't help but feel that the PFA are in the wrong here as well. Of course, it's their job to be on the players side, but if they knew as much as Sunderland did and were still pressuring Sunderland to let him play, that doesn't sit right with me. The PFA are a union and that's it, glorified shop stewards rolling in money. all they give a toss about is the players wages and keeping them playing. l Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Apparently Fletcher was going to be called to give evidence about Johnson's pubic area. Would have to be a cock line-up I reckon, only way to make sure he recognises The Johnson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Fully expect them to scapegoat Margaret Byrne like. She has to go after this, surely? Can't help but feel that the PFA are in the wrong here as well. Of course, it's their job to be on the players side, but if they knew as much as Sunderland did and were still pressuring Sunderland to let him play, that doesn't sit right with me. It has to go all the way to the top. Can't see Short not asking what was going on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 No wonder Fletcher was in a hurry to leave, bet he couldn't sign that Marseille contract quick enough, can just imagine the texts of Johnson to him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Hang on, nobody actually believes that Margaret Byrne kept this all to herself do they? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Classy SAFC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magpie Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Hang on, nobody actually believes that Margaret Byrne kept this all to herself do they? Of course she didn't. And anyone who tries to imply she did are retards. Said all along they had to have known what had actually happened and lo and behold they did. Absolutely fucking disgusting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Hang on, nobody actually believes that Margaret Byrne kept this all to herself do they? Not a chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Hang on, nobody actually believes that Margaret Byrne kept this all to herself do they? Of course she didn't. And anyone who tries to imply she did are retards. Said all along they had to have known what had actually happened and lo and behold they did. Absolutely f***ing disgusting. tbf it looked at first like he'd just denied everything and the club believed it. Different picture now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Hang on, nobody actually believes that Margaret Byrne kept this all to herself do they? Not at all, but I'd be surprised if they don't try and spin it that way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magpie Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Mackem mate of mine says she's a qualified solicitor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Mackem mate of mine says she's a qualified solicitor. As in she solicits? Not surprised Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Mackem mate of mine says she's a qualified solicitor. She is, and she's Irish, obvs. Quick Google search tells you complaints were made against her for lying to magistrates and making false allegations of threatening behaviour. Sounds like a horrible little bint. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/sunderland-fans-call-margaret-byrne-resign-following-adam-johnson-revelations/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 http://www.101greatgoals.com/blog/sunderland-fans-call-margaret-byrne-resign-following-adam-johnson-revelations/ What a surprise. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts