Sho Time Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 'The most common philia' You read that shit ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Just read a thread on RTG before it was pulled, they actually have fans who would play him at the weekend, apparently, according to some, you are a fanny if you think otherwise. We all have our idiot element, they'll be fighting among themselves on Saturday. Live on TV, it could get more embarrassing if they start singing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b357/sleazycome/FB_IMG_1455184425215.jpg Hilarious... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 There was massive pubic outcry with Lee Bowyer joining Newcastle, sunderland keep a nonce in hiding and nothing gets said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 There was massive pubic outcry with Lee Bowyer joining Newcastle, sunderland keep a nonce in hiding and nothing gets said. If he's in hiding it's the worst hiding ever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I think they probably cant say anything as it will prejudice his trial which starts tomorrow if they sack him its taking action before the outcome and jurors (looking purely at the charges he has plead guilty too) will derive that his employers evidently think he is guilty and it could affect his decision making Sunderland will and should sack him but they wont do anything until his trial is finished in two weeks. this is also why the media aren't going mental.... yet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? Indeed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 There was massive pubic outcry with Lee Bowyer joining Newcastle, sunderland keep a nonce in hiding and nothing gets said. If he's in hiding it's the worst hiding ever. Pulling a Jimmy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? no because the full trial isn't over and he hasn't been sentenced yet for all 4 charges, then they can take action I think Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? no because the full trial isn't over and he hasn't been sentenced yet for all 4 charges, then they can take action I think The point is that he isn't going to be found not guilty on the charges he has admitted which in themselves are grounds for dismissal. the right thing is to sack him now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? no because the full trial isn't over and he hasn't been sentenced yet for all 4 charges, then they can take action I think The point is that he isn't going to be found not guilty on the charges he has admitted which in themselves are grounds for dismissal. the right thing is to sack him now yes but that prejudices the rest of the trial from a legal standpoint , they wont/cant until its ALL over and he has been sentenced for ALL charges he is found guilty of/pleaded to Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 that is a fair point Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? no because the full trial isn't over and he hasn't been sentenced yet for all 4 charges, then they can take action I think Crying for them to sack him instantly is such a Facebook generation, offended at everything attitude. They certainly shouldn't play him but there is no reason they shouldn't wait for the verdict like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? no because the full trial isn't over and he hasn't been sentenced yet for all 4 charges, then they can take action I think Crying for them to sack him instantly is such a Facebook generation, offended at everything attitude. They certainly shouldn't play him but there is no reason they shouldn't wait for the verdict like. The right thing to do is suspend him until the trial is over and then sack him, his days are numbered and he shouldn't play for them again but while the case is still being heard they need to hang fire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? no because the full trial isn't over and he hasn't been sentenced yet for all 4 charges, then they can take action I think Crying for them to sack him instantly is such a Facebook generation, offended at everything attitude. They certainly shouldn't play him but there is no reason they shouldn't wait for the verdict like. The right thing to do is suspend him until the trial is over and then sack him, his days are numbered and he shouldn't play for them again but while the case is still being heard they need to hang fire. yep, exactly, what's the problem? everyone scrambling to be the most self-righteous by wanting him sacked within a nanosecond of pleading guilty to a charge while the trial goes on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? no because the full trial isn't over and he hasn't been sentenced yet for all 4 charges, then they can take action I think Crying for them to sack him instantly is such a Facebook generation, offended at everything attitude. They certainly shouldn't play him but there is no reason they shouldn't wait for the verdict like. The right thing to do is suspend him until the trial is over and then sack him, his days are numbered and he shouldn't play for them again but while the case is still being heard they need to hang fire. yep, exactly, what's the problem? everyone scrambling to be the most self-righteous by wanting him sacked within a nanosecond of pleading guilty to a charge while the trial goes on Not sacked - Suspended. Last week Allardyce said that Johnson will continue to be involved in training and games for the duration of the trial. As far as I can see, that's Sunderland's last official position on the matter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? no because the full trial isn't over and he hasn't been sentenced yet for all 4 charges, then they can take action I think Crying for them to sack him instantly is such a Facebook generation, offended at everything attitude. They certainly shouldn't play him but there is no reason they shouldn't wait for the verdict like. The right thing to do is suspend him until the trial is over and then sack him, his days are numbered and he shouldn't play for them again but while the case is still being heard they need to hang fire. yep, exactly, what's the problem? everyone scrambling to be the most self-righteous by wanting him sacked within a nanosecond of pleading guilty to a charge while the trial goes on Not sacked - Suspended. Last week Allardyce said that Johnson will continue to be involved in training and games for the duration of the trial. As far as I can see, that's Sunderland's last official position on the matter. Look back through the thread, a good number were expressing distaste that Sunderland haven't come out and sacked him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? no because the full trial isn't over and he hasn't been sentenced yet for all 4 charges, then they can take action I think Crying for them to sack him instantly is such a Facebook generation, offended at everything attitude. They certainly shouldn't play him but there is no reason they shouldn't wait for the verdict like. The right thing to do is suspend him until the trial is over and then sack him, his days are numbered and he shouldn't play for them again but while the case is still being heard they need to hang fire. yep, exactly, what's the problem? everyone scrambling to be the most self-righteous by wanting him sacked within a nanosecond of pleading guilty to a charge while the trial goes on I think it's just seen that he's done what he's done, admitted to some of it and in respect to admitting those charges absolutely should be sacked, but now isn't the time to do it, impatience and outrage above level headedness. If he's sacked now and it's indeed seen to influence a jury then it could ruin the case and the club could find themselves with some serious questions to answer. If they don't sack him after the case is finished then I'll polish my pitch fork. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Surely they can take action based purely on the fact he's already pleaded guilty? Trial is still ongoing. Until sentence is passed nothing will happen. I doubt he'll be involved at any stage this weekend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Trust me, anything they do or don't do about this will be decided by their legal staff. Making an ethical decision is completely out of their hands until the case is over. The fans on the other hand are utter cunts, they know as much as everyone else in terms of the facts and are still supporting him in the stands or on social media. There's a lot of misinformation going about as to the girl in question, i've seen what she looks like and it's fairly obvious she's a bairn. His missus is a cracker in fairness, she must be in between a rock and a hard place in terms of walking away. They aren't married, she has his kid and she's probably on the cusp of her looks deteriorating, never mind her reputation taking a battering over sticking by him through all this, wouldn't be good for her to walk away from any security his money could provide Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Trust me, anything they do or don't do about this will be decided by their legal staff. Making an ethical decision is completely out of their hands until the case is over. The fans on the other hand are utter cunts, they know as much as everyone else in terms of the facts and are still supporting him in the stands or on social media. There's a lot of misinformation going about as to the girl in question, i've seen what she looks like and it's fairly obvious she's a bairn. His missus is a cracker in fairness, she must be in between a rock and a hard place in terms of walking away. They aren't married, she has his kid and she's probably on the cusp of her looks deteriorating, never mind her reputation taking a battering over sticking by him through all this, wouldn't be good for her to walk away from any security his money could provide Exactly, ethics don't come into it if it puts the club in a questionable legal position, I can't see him being part of the team in the near future either. There's always some knuckle dragging supporters following all clubs that wouldn't see the problem in this, fucking idiots. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cookie1892 Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Trust me, anything they do or don't do about this will be decided by their legal staff. Making an ethical decision is completely out of their hands until the case is over. The fans on the other hand are utter c***s, they know as much as everyone else in terms of the facts and are still supporting him in the stands or on social media. There's a lot of misinformation going about as to the girl in question, i've seen what she looks like and it's fairly obvious she's a bairn. His missus is a cracker in fairness, she must be in between a rock and a hard place in terms of walking away. They aren't married, she has his kid and she's probably on the cusp of her looks deteriorating, never mind her reputation taking a battering over sticking by him through all this, wouldn't be good for her to walk away from any security his money could provide ;D ;D ;D This made me laugh out loud at graft, no other reason other than I have a mental picture of her standing in front of the mirror counting up these pro's and con's of her staying with him then screaming.......... Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh sh1t me looooooooooooks :'( :'( :'( Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 Seeing a few mackems on facebook reacting badly and pulling up stories of Cisse apparently being a pedo. like its some sort of point scoring game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted February 11, 2016 Share Posted February 11, 2016 I just can't get over how fucking stupid Johnson must be to have done this, it's beyond comprehension. IF he now REALLY wanted to shag some young girl, couldn't he have found a 16 year old and just be a disgusting creep instead of a disgusting creep who is now facing some severe jail time? That's just one of the things that doesn't make any sense at all, among many others. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts