Jump to content

NUFC transfer rumours in the press


Recommended Posts

The squad wasn't thin, it never has been. The problem has been lacking quality. Don't see how loaning a player who likely won't do anymore than the likes of Riviere is worthwhile.

 

We have enough numbers, squad players etc etc what we need is quality first choice players not depth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The squad wasn't thin, it never has been. The problem has been lacking quality. Don't see how loaning a player who likely won't do anymore than the likes of Riviere is worthwhile.

 

We have enough numbers, squad players etc etc what we need is quality first choice players not depth.

 

It absolutely was at times last season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our defence sucks, but so many teams have far worse defenders and never look as dishevelled and downright unprofessional as our defence does.

 

Our team in general invites so much pressure onto the defence as we hardly ever control possession for more than a few seconds. I can't help but feel we haven't had a decent pair of central midfielders for a long time. A couple who are able to get open, keep possession and pass the ball to the forward players without hoofing it.

 

Anita could have really developed into one of these such midfielders, but he keeps getting messed about, and has never been provided a truly capable partner to work with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is somewhat hilarious when you look at our goals conceded over the last 2 seasons people think our problem is a striker :lol:

 

If you look at the statistics, you can see why some people are advocating for a prolific striker.

With Remy in the team last year we conceded on average 1,2 goals per game.  Without him we conceded 2,2 goals per game.

 

Thats 1 less goals a game with a prolific striker. 

Of course this doesn't tell the whole story.  To many other variables come into the equation that could affect the numbers.

But it does make an interesting point about teams putting more pressure on us when we have nothing upfront that is remotely threatening.

 

It is obvious that the main focus of this transfer window has gone into fixing that (Riviere, Cabella, De Jong, Ferreyra, Perez). 

But it seems like they still think we need that threat that Remy gave us last year.

 

If we buy Remy, he will likely give us about 24-30 games and 10-15 goals.  The players we have already bought would give us better return than last year in the games where Remy is injured.

Lacazette would hopefully give us more games but is more of a question-mark in amount of goals.  Somehow I would still prefer him to Remy.

 

Campbell on loan is not interesting for me!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

'good business rapport when selling Debuchy' :lol:

 

"£12m? Oh that's superb. Thanks for taking one of our best players, Arsenal. It was an honour. Can we be Facebook friends?"

"Erm....no. f*** off, Charnley".

 

:lol:

 

Anyone else would be like 'You can have Debuchy if we can take Campbell on loan' as opposed to 'Well here's Debuchy but remember this yeah? We might need your help in a few weeks. Pinky promise?'

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zaha is 21 years old and has proven himself in the championship. It's a great time to get him as the hype around him as dropped a bit. £7 million is a great deal for Zaha. Just needs to play games and get his confidence back. I'm not letting the Moyes debacle last year taint my view of him at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...