Jump to content

NUFC transfer rumours in the press


Recommended Posts

If Cabaye had stayed and gotten injured tomorrow for the season I'm not sure people would be too bothered about not signing a central midfielder.

 

We needed a striker this window and we got one.

 

This is now a chance for Ben Arfa to try and break into the side which most should see as a positive.

 

Grenier sounds an interesting player but he obviously doesn't want to sign for whatever reason. Fair enough.

 

If we now go and invest in the summer I won't complain.

 

You spout the same every window. "If we sign people in the next window it'll be fine"

 

The problem is, we never do.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Cabaye had stayed and gotten injured tomorrow for the season I'm not sure people would be too bothered about not signing a central midfielder.

 

We needed a striker this window and we got one.

 

This is now a chance for Ben Arfa to try and break into the side which most should see as a positive.

 

Grenier sounds an interesting player but he obviously doesn't want to sign for whatever reason. Fair enough.

 

If we now go and invest in the summer I won't complain.

 

An injury is bad luck. What we actually have is pure incompetence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Cabaye had stayed and gotten injured tomorrow for the season I'm not sure people would be too bothered about not signing a central midfielder.

 

We needed a striker this window and we got one.

 

This is now a chance for Ben Arfa to try and break into the side which most should see as a positive.

 

Grenier sounds an interesting player but he obviously doesn't want to sign for whatever reason. Fair enough.

 

If we now go and invest in the summer I won't complain.

 

And where are the options outside of the first XI?

 

And we didn't need a striker, we needed two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wish Sky or someone would show this. It's amazing we're doing as well as we are considering how the vast the difference is in net spend between us and everyone else.

 

Perhaps we should be giving the manager and our current set of players some credit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nett last 5 seasons:

 

1 Manchester City £479,950,000

2 Chelsea £269,759,000

3 Manchester United £138,750,000

4 Stoke City £91,175,000

5 Liverpool £89,400,000

6 Aston Villa £86,000,000

7 Southampton £60,750,000

8 Hull City £47,775,000

9 Sunderland £46,930,000

10 Cardiff City £40,470,000

11 West Ham £30,550,000

12 Norwich City £21,650,000

13 Swansea £18,745,000

14 West Bromwich Albion £14,726,000

15 Crystal Palace £11,950,000

16 Fulham £10,880,000

17 Tottenham £3,850,000

18 Arsenal -£4,125,000

19 Everton -£12,315,500

20 Newcastle -£45,000,000

 

I really really REALLY can't believe this. Where's the ambition?

 

If Stoke goes down they'll do it the Portsmouth way...

 

HP?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nett last 5 seasons:

 

1 Manchester City £479,950,000

2 Chelsea £269,759,000

3 Manchester United £138,750,000

4 Stoke City £91,175,000

5 Liverpool £89,400,000

6 Aston Villa £86,000,000

7 Southampton £60,750,000

8 Hull City £47,775,000

9 Sunderland £46,930,000

10 Cardiff City £40,470,000

11 West Ham £30,550,000

12 Norwich City £21,650,000

13 Swansea £18,745,000

14 West Bromwich Albion £14,726,000

15 Crystal Palace £11,950,000

16 Fulham £10,880,000

17 Tottenham £3,850,000

18 Arsenal -£4,125,000

19 Everton -£12,315,500

20 Newcastle -£45,000,000

 

I really really REALLY can't believe this. Where's the ambition?

 

If Stoke goes down they'll do it the Portsmouth way...

 

That's some scary shit.

 

Even scarier for the mackems mind - they've spent over 90 million more than us and are still shite!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Woodgate6

Nett last 5 seasons:

 

1 Manchester City £479,950,000

2 Chelsea £269,759,000

3 Manchester United £138,750,000

4 Stoke City £91,175,000

5 Liverpool £89,400,000

6 Aston Villa £86,000,000

7 Southampton £60,750,000

8 Hull City £47,775,000

9 Sunderland £46,930,000

10 Cardiff City £40,470,000

11 West Ham £30,550,000

12 Norwich City £21,650,000

13 Swansea £18,745,000

14 West Bromwich Albion £14,726,000

15 Crystal Palace £11,950,000

16 Fulham £10,880,000

17 Tottenham £3,850,000

18 Arsenal -£4,125,000

19 Everton -£12,315,500

20 Newcastle -£45,000,000

 

I really really REALLY can't believe this. Where's the ambition?

 

If Stoke goes down they'll do it the Portsmouth way...

 

HP?

 

http://transferleague.co.uk/

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Cabaye had stayed and gotten injured tomorrow for the season I'm not sure people would be too bothered about not signing a central midfielder.

 

We needed a striker this window and we got one.

 

This is now a chance for Ben Arfa to try and break into the side which most should see as a positive.

 

Grenier sounds an interesting player but he obviously doesn't want to sign for whatever reason. Fair enough.

 

If we now go and invest in the summer I won't complain.

 

Dear oh dear. Your opening line....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nett last 5 seasons:

 

1 Manchester City £479,950,000

2 Chelsea £269,759,000

3 Manchester United £138,750,000

4 Stoke City £91,175,000

5 Liverpool £89,400,000

6 Aston Villa £86,000,000

7 Southampton £60,750,000

8 Hull City £47,775,000

9 Sunderland £46,930,000

10 Cardiff City £40,470,000

11 West Ham £30,550,000

12 Norwich City £21,650,000

13 Swansea £18,745,000

14 West Bromwich Albion £14,726,000

15 Crystal Palace £11,950,000

16 Fulham £10,880,000

17 Tottenham £3,850,000

18 Arsenal -£4,125,000

19 Everton -£12,315,500

20 Newcastle -£45,000,000

 

I really really REALLY can't believe this. Where's the ambition?

 

If Stoke goes down they'll do it the Portsmouth way...

 

That's some scary shit.

 

Even scarier for the mackems mind - they've spent over 90 million more than us and are still shite!

 

Exactly why this table means nowt the bottom 3, are just the clubs who have other many years had:

 

A stable core squad

Managers on long term contracts

Success in developing players, getting the benefits on the pitch and then selling on.

 

 

So the top or the bottom of that table is the place to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's becoming ever more clear that he sees us as just another extension of Sports Direct, only there to make profit :dave:

 

It's by far and wide the most depressing time to be a fan of Newcastle at the moment, every other club spent the TV revenue, did we? Did we fuck. Every other club would be scouring the globe looking for a replacement to the world class midfielder we just lost, are we? Are we fuck.

 

De Jong/Remy will both leave when their respective loans are up and we'll be worse off than the start of the season. I wasn't going out tonight but I sure as shite am now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nett last 5 seasons:

 

1 Manchester City £479,950,000

2 Chelsea £269,759,000

3 Manchester United £138,750,000

4 Stoke City £91,175,000

5 Liverpool £89,400,000

6 Aston Villa £86,000,000

7 Southampton £60,750,000

8 Hull City £47,775,000

9 Sunderland £46,930,000

10 Cardiff City £40,470,000

11 West Ham £30,550,000

12 Norwich City £21,650,000

13 Swansea £18,745,000

14 West Bromwich Albion £14,726,000

15 Crystal Palace £11,950,000

16 Fulham £10,880,000

17 Tottenham £3,850,000

18 Arsenal -£4,125,000

19 Everton -£12,315,500

20 Newcastle -£45,000,000

 

I really really REALLY can't believe this. Where's the ambition?

 

If Stoke goes down they'll do it the Portsmouth way...

 

That's some scary s***.

 

Even scarier for the mackems mind - they've spent over 90 million more than us and are still s****!

 

Exactly why this table means nowt the bottom 3, are just the clubs who have other many years had:

 

A stable core squad

Managers on long term contracts

Success in developing players, getting the benefits on the pitch and then selling on.

 

 

So the top or the bottom of that table is the place to be.

 

Are you for real - fucking hell man

Link to post
Share on other sites

We're safe, don't want to qualify for the Europa League and won't pay a penny more than we have to. Any incoming player is seen as an investment and if the club don't believe there's "value" in the signing they'll not do it.

 

It may make business sense but it's utterly depressing as a supporter wanting the club to be the best they can be. Know your place - mediocrity.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best scouting networks? Steady on.

 

We're extremely adept at identifying players that improve the squad. There are few clubs who have had as many "hits" as we have over the past two to three years.

 

It should be obvious to anyone, otherwise by rights we should have been relegated with a net spend like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best scouting networks? Steady on.

 

We're extremely adept at identifying players that improve the squad. There are few clubs who have had as many "hits" as we have over the past two to three years.

 

Aye, we've nearly signed nothing but players that have improved us. You could argue Cissé is the odd one after being turboshit from his 15th game, but it's still harsh to call him a bad signing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...