Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Don't understand the decision from Chelsea. I agree with Lampard on MNF, what do you achieve by sacking him now? An interim manager comes in for 7 months, gets them up to 7th and possibly wins the F.A. Cup. Then you're back to square one. Hiddink's a fraud too.

''

How is Hiddink a fraud?

 

A Fraud is harsh but he's clearly nowhere the coach he was years ago, shown by the fact Pardew outcoached him [emoji38]

Aye but it's ridiculous calling him a fraud. Won the Champions League with PSV, did well with South Korea, Russia, was a pretty poor refereeing display and a moment of magic from Iniesta away from getting to a Champions League final with Chelsea. Not the CV of a fraud

 

Not sure he won the Champions League with PSV [emoji38]

Erm aye he did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

A lad at footy is a Chelsea fan (cockney married to a Gerodie lass and now works up here) and is absolutely gutted. The cult at Chelsea now is if you first don't succeed you're sacked. If you do succeed but have a blip you're sacked. Its mental. In many way Mourinho is the perfect Chelsea manager because he's a short-termer as well. He's a great manager, one of the very best of all-time, but he needs to change his philosophy and show more humility. He guarantees a trophy though and I'd fucking kill to have someone like him at NUFC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've got to love people who would rather have a charismatic manager with a shit style of football instead of a boring guy with a good style of football. Not like watching the sport actually matters

 

I do like good football, but I also appreciate a good defensive team performance. That's not to say I like the way Mourinho approaches the game. He has far too much talent on the pitch to play the way he does. But Diego Simione doesn't play the most attractive football but I respect how he gets 110% out of his players each match.

 

I also like when an inferior team beats someone much better than them using a style completely different to their opponent. Like Chelsea against Barcelona in 2012.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like Mourinho's football but I thought Chelsea should have stuck with him because he became one of their symbols...When you say Chelsea you think of Drogba, Terry, Lampard and Mourinho...Its part of their identity this is what separated them from clubs such as CIty and PSG for example even though it all started with Russian money Mourinho was one main characters building up Chelsea...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...