Jump to content

Recommended Posts

On 19/09/2025 at 16:13, SteV said:

Well, yeah, but gambling under control is a fun hobby / pastime.

 

Eh, "under control" so are drugs.

 

The key lies in the difficulty of maintaining control.

 

If people could maintain control, gambling would not be the industry that it is today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Miercoles said:

 

Eh, "under control" so are drugs.

 

The key lies in the difficulty of maintaining control.

 

If people could maintain control, gambling would not be the industry that it is today.

Well, aye, but you can say that about anything really, drinking, gaming, even eating to an extent.

 

I accept, gambling is probably a lot more addictive than many things, but certainly not drugs. 
 

And you can also do it legally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SteV said:

Well, aye, but you can say that about anything really, drinking, gaming, even eating to an extent.

 

I accept, gambling is probably a lot more addictive than many things, but certainly not drugs. 
 

And you can also do it legally.


Saying it’s legal is no defence, smoking is legal and it’s both highly addictive and devastating to the smokers health. Similar applies to alcohol.   
 

For me gambling is a vice that’s been allowed to spread like an out of control wildfire. It’s addictive, it’s socially acceptable, it’s highly promoted and the marketing is impossible to avoid. 

 

And for those with a gambling problem there’s no physical warning signs that allow people to spot that someone is an abuser or an addict. Because of gambling apps on phones it’s probably the most accessible and easiest to hide of all of the common addictions. 

 

 

Edited by bobbydazzla

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, bobbydazzla said:


Saying it’s legal is no defence, smoking is legal and it’s both highly addictive and devastating to the smokers health. Similar applies to alcohol.   
 

For me gambling is a vice that’s been allowed to spread like an out of control wildfire. It’s addictive, it’s socially acceptable, it’s highly promoted and the marketing is impossible to avoid. 

 

And for those with a gambling problem there’s no physical warning signs that allow people to spot that someone is an abuser or an addict. Because of gambling apps on phones it’s probably the most accessible and easiest to hide of all of the common addictions. 

 

 

 

The biggest issue (well, alright, maybe not the biggest, but a main one) is that the regulation around bookmakers is absolutely pathetic.

 

They get away with murder. Constantly telling us how much they’re doing to try and combat problem gambling, and how difficult it is to identify. Yet they can seemingly identify ‘winning’ punters at the drop of a hat, and quickly limit them to pennies.

 

And as I’ve said, it’s questionable whether online casino’s and ‘games’ should exist at all, given they’re completely rigged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, 54 said:

Man United havent won back to back Premier League games under Amorim :lol:

I had to look this up cause I thought you must be taking the piss. Pretty surprised it hasn't happened yet just by chance. Impressive

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't get over this idea that a manager who can only play one system and can only make it work with all of the right players to fit that system, is going to be successful once that criteria's met.

 

I get that managers have their preferences and philosophy etc, but I can't think of a single good manager who isn't at least a bit pragmatic. Most of them are very, very pragmatic. For me him not being able to adapt already means that the conclusion now is that he isn't a good manager, regardless of whether he ever gets this ideal scenario he needs.

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

I can't get over this idea that a manager who can only play one system and can only make it work with all of the right players to fit that system, is going to be successful once that criteria's met.

 

I get that managers have their preferences and philosophy etc, but I can't think of a single good manager who isn't at least a bit pragmatic. Most of them are very, very pragmatic. For me him not being able to adapt already means he isn't a good manager.


Maybe 10 years ago but if you look at any top manager these days they all play numerous systems both game by game

and during games. 

Beggars belief he thought the idea of making their midfield even more porous and slow would be something that would bring results, particularly away from home. Not too mention their ongoing woes in goal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...