Mike Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Just now making a list. You mother fuckers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I thought the shortlist they made in January meant they didn't need to make another one??? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Gonna be a very shortlist I imagine. Probably currently reads 1. John 2. pick up milk pick up mike's dry cleaning Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The 80 man shortlist from January have all seen the sterling work of JC and have duly pulled out in fear of embarrassment or 'tha've bottled it, man' in the words of Carver. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Gonna be a very shortlist I imagine. Probably currently reads 1. John 2. pick up milk pick up mike's dry cleaning Finally some work Charnley is eminently suitable for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I thought the shortlist they made in January meant they didn't need to make another one??? Had 80 names on it that, Man. Have to pare it down a bit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Wasn't there a quote from Charnley a while back where he said that all the work had been done so if it did wait until the summer it wouldn't be a long process? I guess that was before John managed a one game unbeaten run, but still... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiedean Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I just can't believe that (although he sounds it) Mike Ashley is as thick as he comes across by some of his appointments. I really don't see how hard it can be to be aware of the obvious faults at this club, or in fact how easy it would be to get things running smoothly. Why does he insist on surrounding himself with incompetent staff who clearly have less of an idea about how things work in the footballing world than he does? It's not rocket science that you would employ a general manager/chairman with previous experience of running a football club or at least knowing how it's done effectively. Charnley in fact has a testicle for a head, all in all he is just a walking bollock with zero ability in a sporting environment and even less where football in concerned. You'd think Ashley would have learnt from the shit-storm that Llambias created or the wank mess that 'Boggle-eyes' Wise was involved in. It's simple Ashley surrounds himself with YES men and that's why they are incompetent atseholes. Because anyone with any ounce of savvy would challenge him and throw up arguments. Mike doesn't like this do takes easy option, the fat cunt It's same in any business though employ YES men and they are usually so out of their depth it's unreal , they just adopt and do as they are told with no fuss Charnley has went from club secretary to chief exec how the fuck has that happened, in no other structure would you have such a leap up the ladder He's so blatantly a mouthpiece and arse licker...and we all know Mike just loves to be loved. The fat kid wth no mates bullied in the playground coming out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallace Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Wasn't there a quote from Charnley a while back where he said that all the work had been done so if it did wait until the summer it wouldn't be a long process? I guess that was before John managed a one game unbeaten run, but still... Trouble is some of those on the list have gone and got themselves jobs. Goodness knows why they didn't want to wait for another few months before Carver gets appointed permanently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Wasn't there a quote from Charnley a while back where he said that all the work had been done so if it did wait until the summer it wouldn't be a long process? I guess that was before John managed a one game unbeaten run, but still... Seem to remember this as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I thought the shortlist they made in January meant they didn't need to make another one??? They'll make as many shortlists as it takes to get to the start of Aug without anyone coming in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Who's on the football board apart from this guy? Carr? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 I thought the shortlist they made in January meant they didn't need to make another one??? Had 80 names on it that, Man. Have to pare it down a bit. 78 were from me and my various aliases. Rick Van Bender got an immediately reply. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Wasn't there a quote from Charnley a while back where he said that all the work had been done so if it did wait until the summer it wouldn't be a long process? I guess that was before John managed a one game unbeaten run, but still... Seem to remember this as well. Did they manage to interview all 80 on the list then? That must have been a busy Monday morning. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest antz1uk Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 might have been skype, can just imagine charnley getting caught by Garde fapping off to spankwire or something not realising his camera was on Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 The Lee Charnley shortlist-making starter pack: http://s13.postimg.org/65lb1qjhj/Fotor_Created.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Didnt Charnley tell Douglas ages ago that 80 wasnt a true figure, more an illustration that many had enquired. Plus as i have said before a few people like Micky Quinn have stated they applied so easy to dismiss a fair few anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Wasn't there a quote from Charnley a while back where he said that all the work had been done so if it did wait until the summer it wouldn't be a long process? I guess that was before John managed a one game unbeaten run, but still... Seem to remember this as well. Did they manage to interview all 80 on the list then? That must have been a busy Monday morning. Not sure what that has to do with anything? There was a club statement that the search for the new head coach would take a back seat until the end of the season but the prep work meant it could be picked up and progressed from this point onwards. Now they're making it sound like they will have to start all over again. I'm not in the slightest bit surprised by this development btw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Didnt Charnley tell Douglas ages ago that 80 wasnt a true figure, more an illustration that many had enquired. Plus as i have said before a few people like Micky Quinn have stated they applied so easy to dismiss a fair few anyway. To get to the point though, did they really interview any serious candidates other than Garde? For the claim to have been made that the work has all been done to bring someone in you would think they must have interviewed at least a few. To my mind though it seems they interviewed Garde and probably sounded out McClaren who turned out to be a flip flop. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Didnt Charnley tell Douglas ages ago that 80 wasnt a true figure, more an illustration that many had enquired. Plus as i have said before a few people like Micky Quinn have stated they applied so easy to dismiss a fair few anyway. To get to the point though, did they really interview any serious candidates other than Garde? For the claim to have been made that the work has all been done to bring someone in you would think they must have interviewed at least a few. To my mind though it seems they interviewed Garde and probably sounded out McClaren who turned out to be a flip flop. I have no doubts their work was basically talk to Garde 1/2 times, few informal chats with SMC and possibly a few agents whoring their men about to no avail. Basically our list was three men and we took the lazy option and thats it. Any 'work' done will be a scribbled page of various cheap blokes and charlatans and gardes offer of coming with his own people near the bottom/listed as PTO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Once they deleted anyone who wanted a competitive salary, anyone who wanted their own staff, anyone who wanted to try to win every game and anyyone who had an employer to be compensated I guess it was a lot less than 80. Didnt Charnley tell Douglas ages ago that 80 wasnt a true figure, more an illustration that many had enquired. Plus as i have said before a few people like Micky Quinn have stated they applied so easy to dismiss a fair few anyway. To get to the point though, did they really interview any serious candidates other than Garde? For the claim to have been made that the work has all been done to bring someone in you would think they must have interviewed at least a few. To my mind though it seems they interviewed Garde and probably sounded out McClaren who turned out to be a flip flop. I have no doubts their work was basically talk to Garde 1/2 times, few informal chats with SMC and possibly a few agents whoring their men about to no avail. Basically our list was three men and we took the lazy option and thats it. Any 'work' done will be a scribbled page of various cheap blokes and charlatans and gardes offer of coming with his own people near the bottom/listed as PTO I was going to say Charnley's probably lost that piece of paper but then remembered he's a secretary. It's probably tucked away neatly in a filing cabinet ready for handy reference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BONTEMPI Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 "Lee Charnley to draw up head coach shortlist after being handed full control of search" Shortlist, that's a canny idea. Wonder how long it took him to come up with that one. Full control? I thought Ashley claimed he doesn't make those decisions and has people to do that job for him. Lies, lies, lies, don't fall for his shit and don't renew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted May 27, 2015 Share Posted May 27, 2015 Sorry if Giggs: http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/who-lee-charnley-man-charge-6772955 That article tells you nothing...ive still not a clue who he is or what qualifies him to do the one of the most important jobs in the club. He's been doing his short list for our next manager for months now...whats the problem? Lost his pen? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted May 30, 2015 Share Posted May 30, 2015 Running our club or ruining our club…. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now