Jump to content
Newcastle-Online

Hatem Ben Arfa (still a free agent)

Dave

by Dave
in Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mole_Toonfan

Mole_Toonfan

Posted
Posted

I personally think he's had a better season than most of the squad of attacking players and believe he should be fighting for a starting position or on the bench. He's in outrageous form, world class form tbh. They could probably get away with playing Griezmann, Martial and Hatem in a front 3 with Matuidi, Kante and Pogba behind them and be perfectly fine.

 

Probably get massively slated for my views above.

 

Why? all that is completely true, IMO anyway. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites
Kanji

Kanji

Posted
Posted

Think he offers far more than Payet does, who is a brilliant attacking player in his own right - but Payet doesn't have the explosive attacking ability that HBA has and he's not going to do anything better in open play. Perhaps from free kicks you're probably still going to have Pogba take those, no?

 

Don't know, just find Deschamps/Blanc and all this so incredibly frustrating because I'd really like Hatem to just get his chance and show what he's all about. His general swagger and interviews and the way he's carried himself this season has been top notch.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Tooj

Tooj

Posted
Posted

Think he offers far more than Payet does, who is a brilliant attacking player in his own right - but Payet doesn't have the explosive attacking ability that HBA has and he's not going to do anything better in open play. Perhaps from free kicks you're probably still going to have Pogba take those, no?

 

Don't know, just find Deschamps/Blanc and all this so incredibly frustrating because I'd really like Hatem to just get his chance and show what he's all about. His general swagger and interviews and the way he's carried himself this season has been top notch.

Far more is a ridiculous thing to say considering Payet has just performed better in a full Premier League Season than Ben Arfa ever did.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DJ_NUFC

DJ_NUFC

Posted
Posted

Think he offers far more than Payet does, who is a brilliant attacking player in his own right - but Payet doesn't have the explosive attacking ability that HBA has and he's not going to do anything better in open play. Perhaps from free kicks you're probably still going to have Pogba take those, no?

 

Don't know, just find Deschamps/Blanc and all this so incredibly frustrating because I'd really like Hatem to just get his chance and show what he's all about. His general swagger and interviews and the way he's carried himself this season has been top notch.

Far more is a ridiculous thing to say considering Payet has just performed better in a full Premier League Season than Ben Arfa ever did.

 

Trolling away this Friday, I see.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Kanji

Kanji

Posted
Posted

But Ben Arfa had to deal with injuries and Alan Pardew...odd comparison.  Think Hatem's season with Nice wrecks anything Payet has done when he was over in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Mole_Toonfan

Mole_Toonfan

Posted
Posted

But Ben Arfa had to deal with injuries and Alan Pardew...odd comparison.  Think Hatem's season with Nice wrecks anything Payet has done when he was over in France.

 

Payet's last season in France was pretty exceptional, like :lol:

 

7 goals in 38 games? not that exceptional. :lol: He never really had an exceptional year in France, which is why most media people where so surprised with how successful he's been in England. He never really had a consistent year ( or even few months tbh :lol: ) until this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Gallowgate Toon

Gallowgate Toon

Posted
Posted

But Ben Arfa had to deal with injuries and Alan Pardew...odd comparison.  Think Hatem's season with Nice wrecks anything Payet has done when he was over in France.

 

Payet's last season in France was pretty exceptional, like :lol:

 

7 goals in 38 games? not that exceptional. :lol: He never really had an exceptional year in France, which is why most media people where so surprised with how successful he's been in England. He never really had a consistent year ( or even few months tbh :lol: ) until this season.

 

Rocking 17 assists. He's an attacking mid rather than a goalscorer and he was one of the best players in Ligue 1 last year, no doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Marmoset

Marmoset

Posted
Posted

Think he offers far more than Payet does, who is a brilliant attacking player in his own right - but Payet doesn't have the explosive attacking ability that HBA has and he's not going to do anything better in open play. Perhaps from free kicks you're probably still going to have Pogba take those, no?

 

Don't know, just find Deschamps/Blanc and all this so incredibly frustrating because I'd really like Hatem to just get his chance and show what he's all about. His general swagger and interviews and the way he's carried himself this season has been top notch.

Far more is a ridiculous thing to say considering Payet has just performed better in a full Premier League Season than Ben Arfa ever did.

 

Trolling away this Friday, I see.

 

Well, it is a fact mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Alto

Alto

Posted
Posted

Cantona is bullshitting, as always. We have an Arab god in France, named Zidane. HBA's North African origins don't explain directly the reason why Deschamps did not pick him. However, it may have had a soft, indirect influence.

I have no clear evidence of what I’m about to say. This is a feeling, more than a rigorous analysis. Rightly or wrongly, HBA is categorized, in France, as an unstable player, having problems with authority, and especially with his coaches. For all we know, there have been some incidents, but minor ones actually (even insignificant), and for which it's been revealed that HBA was not all wrong. The problem is that this last aspect does not matter here: once you are labeled as a pariah, it is enduring. And this is where his origins come into play. That a young Arab man has problems with authority seems almost natural to many, or at least it is expected. So when it happens, we may make the link with his origins, and think it was actually the cause of such a behavior. Being an Arab and an unsubordinated player is a package.

If you behave well, being an Arab is no problem. If you make one mistake, you’ll hardly have a second chance, when others might. 

When Griezmann makes a mistake, and he did a big one is the past, this does not happen. He is punished, but we think he deserves a second chance. And if he behaves well, then we can move on. This was only fair. We thought it could have been a one-time mistake. In this case there was nothing that could let us believe that this bad behavior was anything structural. As a consequence, he did not become a pariah. Today we all forgot about that incident.

As an Arab, HBA does not have this chance, or has is to a lesser extent. We believe he had fights because he was an Arab. And the problem is that he is still one, and this will not change. So why give him another chance? This is not a matter of temporary behavior. This is a matter of his real nature in people’s eyes. So here, contrary to Griezmann, there is reason to think that this was a one-time mistake. Today, a strong argument that is made against Ben Arfa is that he would not have behaved well as a substitute. He will cause troubles. This belief is due to these stories.  The cause of his assumed bad behavior has not been removed: his origins.

To sum up, if he was not picked, it is not because he is an Arab. It’s because is a pariah. But being an Arab can easily make you so.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
nemtizz

nemtizz

Posted
Posted

Cantona is bullshitting, as always. We have an Arab god in France, named Zidane. HBA's North African origins don't explain directly the reason why Deschamps did not pick him. However, it may have had a soft, indirect influence.

I have no clear evidence of what I’m about to say. This is a feeling, more than a rigorous analysis. Rightly or wrongly, HBA is categorized, in France, as an unstable player, having problems with authority, and especially with his coaches. For all we know, there have been some incidents, but minor ones actually (even insignificant), and for which it's been revealed that HBA was not all wrong. The problem is that this last aspect does not matter here: once you are labeled as a pariah, it is enduring. And this is where his origins come into play. That a young Arab man has problems with authority seems almost natural to many, or at least it is expected. So when it happens, we may make the link with his origins, and think it was actually the cause of such a behavior. Being an Arab and an unsubordinated player is a package.

If you behave well, being an Arab is no problem. If you make one mistake, you’ll hardly have a second chance, when others might. 

When Griezmann makes a mistake, and he did a big one is the past, this does not happen. He is punished, but we think he deserves a second chance. And if he behaves well, then we can move on. This was only fair. We thought it could have been a one-time mistake. In this case there was nothing that could let us believe that this bad behavior was anything structural. As a consequence, he did not become a pariah. Today we all forgot about that incident.

As an Arab, HBA does not have this chance, or has is to a lesser extent. We believe he had fights because he was an Arab. And the problem is that he is still one, and this will not change. So why give him another chance? This is not a matter of temporary behavior. This is a matter of his real nature in people’s eyes. So here, contrary to Griezmann, there is reason to think that this was a one-time mistake. Today, a strong argument that is made against Ben Arfa is that he would not have behaved well as a substitute. He will cause troubles. This belief is due to these stories.  The cause of his assumed bad behavior has not been removed: his origins.

To sum up, if he was not picked, it is not because he is an Arab. It’s because is a pariah. But being an Arab can easily make you so.

 

 

:lol: Good to know.

Link to post
Share on other sites
newsted

newsted

Posted
Posted

Cantona is bullshitting, as always. We have an Arab god in France, named Zidane. HBA's North African origins don't explain directly the reason why Deschamps did not pick him. However, it may have had a soft, indirect influence.

I have no clear evidence of what I’m about to say. This is a feeling, more than a rigorous analysis. Rightly or wrongly, HBA is categorized, in France, as an unstable player, having problems with authority, and especially with his coaches. For all we know, there have been some incidents, but minor ones actually (even insignificant), and for which it's been revealed that HBA was not all wrong. The problem is that this last aspect does not matter here: once you are labeled as a pariah, it is enduring. And this is where his origins come into play. That a young Arab man has problems with authority seems almost natural to many, or at least it is expected. So when it happens, we may make the link with his origins, and think it was actually the cause of such a behavior. Being an Arab and an unsubordinated player is a package.

If you behave well, being an Arab is no problem. If you make one mistake, you’ll hardly have a second chance, when others might. 

When Griezmann makes a mistake, and he did a big one is the past, this does not happen. He is punished, but we think he deserves a second chance. And if he behaves well, then we can move on. This was only fair. We thought it could have been a one-time mistake. In this case there was nothing that could let us believe that this bad behavior was anything structural. As a consequence, he did not become a pariah. Today we all forgot about that incident.

As an Arab, HBA does not have this chance, or has is to a lesser extent. We believe he had fights because he was an Arab. And the problem is that he is still one, and this will not change. So why give him another chance? This is not a matter of temporary behavior. This is a matter of his real nature in people’s eyes. So here, contrary to Griezmann, there is reason to think that this was a one-time mistake. Today, a strong argument that is made against Ben Arfa is that he would not have behaved well as a substitute. He will cause troubles. This belief is due to these stories.  The cause of his assumed bad behavior has not been removed: his origins.

To sum up, if he was not picked, it is not because he is an Arab. It’s because is a pariah. But being an Arab can easily make you so.

 

 

Are you French, my friend? I am interested that there is a distinction between "Arabs" and others. If they grew up in France, are they not French too?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Alto

Alto

Posted
Posted

Cantona is bullshitting, as always. We have an Arab god in France, named Zidane. HBA's North African origins don't explain directly the reason why Deschamps did not pick him. However, it may have had a soft, indirect influence.

I have no clear evidence of what I’m about to say. This is a feeling, more than a rigorous analysis. Rightly or wrongly, HBA is categorized, in France, as an unstable player, having problems with authority, and especially with his coaches. For all we know, there have been some incidents, but minor ones actually (even insignificant), and for which it's been revealed that HBA was not all wrong. The problem is that this last aspect does not matter here: once you are labeled as a pariah, it is enduring. And this is where his origins come into play. That a young Arab man has problems with authority seems almost natural to many, or at least it is expected. So when it happens, we may make the link with his origins, and think it was actually the cause of such a behavior. Being an Arab and an unsubordinated player is a package.

If you behave well, being an Arab is no problem. If you make one mistake, you’ll hardly have a second chance, when others might. 

When Griezmann makes a mistake, and he did a big one is the past, this does not happen. He is punished, but we think he deserves a second chance. And if he behaves well, then we can move on. This was only fair. We thought it could have been a one-time mistake. In this case there was nothing that could let us believe that this bad behavior was anything structural. As a consequence, he did not become a pariah. Today we all forgot about that incident.

As an Arab, HBA does not have this chance, or has is to a lesser extent. We believe he had fights because he was an Arab. And the problem is that he is still one, and this will not change. So why give him another chance? This is not a matter of temporary behavior. This is a matter of his real nature in people’s eyes. So here, contrary to Griezmann, there is reason to think that this was a one-time mistake. Today, a strong argument that is made against Ben Arfa is that he would not have behaved well as a substitute. He will cause troubles. This belief is due to these stories.  The cause of his assumed bad behavior has not been removed: his origins.

To sum up, if he was not picked, it is not because he is an Arab. It’s because is a pariah. But being an Arab can easily make you so.

 

 

Are you French, my friend? I am interested that there is a distinction between "Arabs" and others. If they grew up in France, are they not French too?

 

Both French and Arabs.

And yes I am French (and also a Nice fan).

Link to post
Share on other sites
Parky

Parky

Posted
Posted

Cantona is bullshitting, as always. We have an Arab god in France, named Zidane. HBA's North African origins don't explain directly the reason why Deschamps did not pick him. However, it may have had a soft, indirect influence.

I have no clear evidence of what I’m about to say. This is a feeling, more than a rigorous analysis. Rightly or wrongly, HBA is categorized, in France, as an unstable player, having problems with authority, and especially with his coaches. For all we know, there have been some incidents, but minor ones actually (even insignificant), and for which it's been revealed that HBA was not all wrong. The problem is that this last aspect does not matter here: once you are labeled as a pariah, it is enduring. And this is where his origins come into play. That a young Arab man has problems with authority seems almost natural to many, or at least it is expected. So when it happens, we may make the link with his origins, and think it was actually the cause of such a behavior. Being an Arab and an unsubordinated player is a package.

If you behave well, being an Arab is no problem. If you make one mistake, you’ll hardly have a second chance, when others might. 

When Griezmann makes a mistake, and he did a big one is the past, this does not happen. He is punished, but we think he deserves a second chance. And if he behaves well, then we can move on. This was only fair. We thought it could have been a one-time mistake. In this case there was nothing that could let us believe that this bad behavior was anything structural. As a consequence, he did not become a pariah. Today we all forgot about that incident.

As an Arab, HBA does not have this chance, or has is to a lesser extent. We believe he had fights because he was an Arab. And the problem is that he is still one, and this will not change. So why give him another chance? This is not a matter of temporary behavior. This is a matter of his real nature in people’s eyes. So here, contrary to Griezmann, there is reason to think that this was a one-time mistake. Today, a strong argument that is made against Ben Arfa is that he would not have behaved well as a substitute. He will cause troubles. This belief is due to these stories.  The cause of his assumed bad behavior has not been removed: his origins.

To sum up, if he was not picked, it is not because he is an Arab. It’s because is a pariah. But being an Arab can easily make you so.

 

 

Are you French, my friend? I am interested that there is a distinction between "Arabs" and others. If they grew up in France, are they not French too?

 

I lived in Paris for a year. The French hate all Arabs and there is an undercurrent of racism in all their dealings with Arabs of any background. The South of France is even worse. Multiculturalism as we know it in the UK hasn't worked in France because the French think they are better than everyone, that they single handedly invented culture and food and anything you can think of. One one level they are contemptuous of anyone who isn't French never mind Arab....Their history of colonization was barbaric and cruel and high handed. A daft and ridiculous country always in the shadow of Germany who they are shit scared of.

 

The average Frenchman is introverted and snobbish so they find the Arabs uppity 'too full of life', too talented....They don't even like Ribery ffs because he has a rebellious nature. They never like Catona because he was an idealist an individual with gifts. Ever play table football against French in a cafe and you soon find out their nature....Blame each other and thoroughly bad sports.

 

The beautiful soul and spirit that is Hatem is too good for these gallic creeps.  :D

Link to post
Share on other sites
Geordie Ahmed

Geordie Ahmed

Posted
Posted

Zidane is a muslim Arab though so they can f*** off :lol:

 

His parents are Muslims, I don't think he regards himself as Muslim

 

That long post from Alto is full of contradictions, on the one hand says being Arab has nothing to do with it BUT then saying Ben Arfa being Arab has contributed to it because he does not get the leeway that Griezmann got

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...