Jump to content

Recommended Posts

23-21 in the wanting us to lose category, seems the decision is going to be pretty split on that.

 

The soopafans just cant see it would be for the greater good.

 

I do still find it very strange actively wanting to lose tbh, means I'm less into watching the match than ever. 

 

Was definitely happier with Palace goals than ours the other day though, but nowhere near as happy as I was with an NUFC goal when I was interested.

 

I was gutted when we were 3-2 up, I just see every win as an extra 2-3 game lifeline for Pardew.

 

Cant get behind that at all.

 

Its just a sad state of affairs all round really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest JamesyJazz

23-21 in the wanting us to lose category, seems the decision is going to be pretty split on that.

 

The soopafans just cant see it would be for the greater good.

 

I do still find it very strange actively wanting to lose tbh, means I'm less into watching the match than ever. 

 

Was definitely happier with Palace goals than ours the other day though, but nowhere near as happy as I was with an NUFC goal when I was interested.

 

I was gutted when we were 3-2 up, I just see every win as an extra 2-3 game lifeline for Pardew.

 

Cant get behind that at all.

 

Its just a sad state of affairs all round really.

Gutted being 3-2 up?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

May have already been said, but don't the club usually take legal action against articles with no substance? Has that been done with the independent article about him having two games?

 

I'm not aware that they've ever taken legal action against any newspaper? They've threatened to but have we seen them in court, and win?

 

As for the Independent article, the newspaper says it 'understands', and carries no direct quotes. Also, as the games in question have yet to take place, how can we ascertain that the article has 'no substance. It's not actionable even if he lasts until 2018.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May have already been said, but don't the club usually take legal action against articles with no substance? Has that been done with the independent article about him having two games?

 

I'm not aware that they've ever taken legal action against any newspaper? They've threatened to but have we seen them in court, and win?

 

As for the Independent article, the newspaper says it 'understands', and carries no direct quotes. Also, as the games in question have yet to take place, how can we ascertain that the article has 'no substance. It's not actionable even if he lasts until 2018.

 

They've banned papers for "false and misleading reports". It's as hypocrite you can get, but they've done it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May have already been said, but don't the club usually take legal action against articles with no substance? Has that been done with the independent article about him having two games?

 

I'm not aware that they've ever taken legal action against any newspaper? They've threatened to but have we seen them in court, and win?

 

As for the Independent article, the newspaper says it 'understands', and carries no direct quotes. Also, as the games in question have yet to take place, how can we ascertain that the article has 'no substance. It's not actionable even if he lasts until 2018.

 

They've banned papers for "false and misleading reports". It's as hypocrite you can get, but they've done it.

 

 

Sure, ncj are still out and, I assume, the Express - but I'm unsure if they've taken legal action against anyone, ever, that's ended in court. I know that they've had plenty of stories spiked at ncj in the past by threatening to remove press access, then banned them anyway (primarily because ncj couldn't afford what Jabba was asking for in £ to keep their high level of access to players as well as games).

 

Regardless, the club can't keep Pardew on for another two games and then turn around and sue The Independent.

 

Yes, highly hypocritical. Wendy Talylor is a congenital liar. So bad, in fact, that she doesn't even know she's doing it. She's lied to my face on several occasions and then denied having done so when presented with the truth. Pardew's the same - I don't think he knows the difference between his silver-foxed reality and the actual truth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the writing is on the wall for pardew now, the bottom line is that the current squad is full of players that don't suit his style, he sat back and said nowt no matter what Ashley did and now he's left with the results of being a coward

Link to post
Share on other sites

We've had polls at various time since he came here and it will be interesting to see exactly how people feel about him now.  I can guess how it will go but I though we'd have had at least one vote for him to stay even if it was somebody taking the piss.  I hope nobody does take the piss because it will be interesting to see just how bad things are for him now.  It will also be interesting to see how other manager polls have gone and to be able to compare his popularity, or lack of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I voted stay by accident :(

 

It's logical to assume that the first option will always be the positive, the second the negative. Every poll says "Yes or No", none say "No or Yes". I blame the poll.

 

I blame you for not reading it and I can't change it to allow people to change how they vote, I don't know if a mod can do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...