r0cafella Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 Just now, TheBrownBottle said: Yep - it can’t be an ‘affiliated party’ transaction. Brought in back in October, oddly enough … Are you sure? Pretty sure it can be just has to be judged at fair value. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) We can have aramco or Saudi golf, it would just be subject to fair market value due to being affiliated. What I’m unsure of is if an unaffiliated sponsor comes in are they subject to same scrutiny ? Edited June 1, 2022 by Whitley mag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sushimonster85 Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) 2 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Are you sure? Pretty sure it can be just has to be judged at fair value. Yep, this is the case. If it's an affiliated company the Premier League will refer it to an independent panel who will judge if its deemed to be fair market value, or inflated. I would also mention, this is legally far too vague and will likely crumble at the first hint of a legal challenge. Whether that comes from us, or some other team down the line. Edited June 1, 2022 by sushimonster85 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Are you sure? Pretty sure it can be just has to be judged at fair value. Yeah this is correct. Aramco and Saudia are both linked to the Saudi government, so would require sign off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 23 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: They are comically amateur mind. It’s no big deal, but fuck me you couldn’t imagine adidas or Nike doing this Craptore Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 Also, please correct me folks but aren’t all sponsors worth more than a million subject to this rule? Related party or not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 Delay will just be amateur hour from Castore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 As has been stated before I can’t see this related party stuff standing up in court. Leicester sponsored by King Power and City by Etihad. Can’t be one rule for them and one for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, r0cafella said: Also, please correct me folks but aren’t all sponsors worth more than a million subject to this rule? Related party or not? Good question I’m not sure on this, will also be interesting how they treat Saudia if it’s them. Technically they’re not linked to PIF, but you can be assured they’d also be treat as affiliated I would imagine. Edited June 1, 2022 by Whitley mag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sushimonster85 Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 Just now, GeordieDazzler said: As has been stated before I can’t see this related party stuff standing up in court. Leicester sponsored by King Power and City by Etihad. Can’t be one rule for them and one for us. They'd argue that those deals were signed before these new rules came into affect. The real iffy area is determining what 'fair market value' really is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 1 minute ago, GeordieDazzler said: As has been stated before I can’t see this related party stuff standing up in court. Leicester sponsored by King Power and City by Etihad. Can’t be one rule for them and one for us. It doesn’t at all. Complete restraint of trade of Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 Castore just figuring out how to make the fun88 logo make a 5 on this shirt to annoy everyone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 1 minute ago, sushimonster85 said: They'd argue that those deals were signed before these new rules came into affect. The real iffy area is determining what 'fair market value' really is. Then that is restraint of trade and anti-competitive. It's only a matter of time before someone takes this to the courts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 2 minutes ago, et tu brute said: Then that is restraint of trade and anti-competitive. It's only a matter of time before someone takes this to the courts. Up rocks Nick de Marco Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeordieDazzler Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 City is an affiliated partner to nearly every hotel in Dubai at this point. Sure there was an Athletic article a few weeks back about how they made a few phone calls and did minimal research to find that half of the city ‘partners’ didn’t even have offices. Or staff. Or actually do anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 5 minutes ago, et tu brute said: Then that is restraint of trade and anti-competitive. It's only a matter of time before someone takes this to the courts. Exactly. You can't let others have these huge sponsorship deals, then change the rules so others can't and then say, "they signed those deals before we changed the rules" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaztoon Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 Anything that hints of a restriction of trade will last a day in court.. the prem knows this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) All these folk getting upset with Castore on twitter need to get a fucking life. I love hearing all the rumours etc, but for grown blokes to be getting this worked up over a strip is a bit ott. Edited June 1, 2022 by Whitley mag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mofo Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Whitley mag said: All these folk getting upset with Castore on twitter need to get a fucking life. I love hearing all the rumours etc, but for grown blokes to be getting this worked up over a strip is a bit ott. Mackem! How the fuck can you not get worked up over it? Already pre-ordered mine, I'm probably a xl but went for a medium to show my drinking belly! Not sure on short and sock sizing though... Edited June 1, 2022 by mofo Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 5 minutes ago, Whitley mag said: All these folk getting upset with Castore on twitter need to get a fucking life. I love hearing all the rumours etc, but for grown blokes to be getting this worked up over a strip is a bit ott. 14 years of Ashley, “inject this shit, any shit” is the new mantra, and it’s fucking glorious. The anticipation, the excitement! I love it. all aboard the joyride, onwards and upwards Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 (edited) 13 minutes ago, Whitley mag said: All these folk getting upset with Castore on twitter need to get a fucking life. I love hearing all the rumours etc, but for grown blokes to be getting this worked up over a strip is a bit ott. It's becoming more and more clear that football supporters are turning into football consumers. You'd expect the ones doing the selling to treat us that way, what I didn't expect is just how much supporters would start demanding to be treated that way. Edited June 1, 2022 by Kid Icarus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBG Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 Suppose it would make sense to tie up Ritchie's new contract and have him holding up the new shirt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted June 1, 2022 Share Posted June 1, 2022 17 minutes ago, TBG said: Suppose it would make sense to tie up Ritchie's new contract and have him holding up the new shirt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now