TBG Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 From the official site http://www.nufc.co.uk/javaImages/ce/8b/0,,10278~13732814,00.jpg Whats the black on the back under the puma triangle? If that was the only picture released you would think it was a nice strip, maybe even with a striped back It's that Nufc thing on the back http://i1.adis.ws/i/jpl/jd_170509_b?qlt=80&unsharp=0,1,1,7&img404=jd_imagemissing&w=683&h=700 Cause ya'nah it just makes sense to have one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 I think he means this: http://i.imgur.com/jzUf3Eq.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Oh wow ... they actually got rid of the sticky tape badge?! Thank God for that. I detested that thing. I kind of like the kit. Sorry guys. I feel a bit embarrassed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 It would be alright if not for the awful back, random blue stripes within the black stripes, and of course the horrendous sponsor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Boy Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 I think he means this: http://i.imgur.com/jzUf3Eq.jpg Yep, not saying I think there is something on the back, just looks like the official site trying to make it appear better (along with cropping out the chevron shit) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Looks like the Ashleyout lot have a plan to reveal and alternate to that monstrosity: @Ashleyoutdotcom - "Don't buy the Wronga kit... Buy the Right Kit" Coming soon... #magpieshirt #Ashleyout #NUFC Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Quichà Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Call me crazy but I think it's pretty smart. I'm not overly keen on the back but it could be worse. As for the wonga logo being the old one, who really cares? Shit is shit no matter what shape it is plastered onto a shirt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 You're crazy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Quichà Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 You're crazy Touché. I should have really seen that coming Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 One of the few kits to look worse in the official shot than the leaked photos. That back is just yet another insult. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
morla84 Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 If anyone forks out £52 for that they're, an absolute cunt tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 If anyone forks out £52 for that they're, an absolute cunt tbh Exactly. You could knock far better than those out for a fraction of that price. "Twice as nice for half the price" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 I really like that kit. Not going to buy it obv but I think it's nice. Just wish we had a decent sponsor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonTastic Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 I see Ashley Out are creating an alternative strip according to their account on twitter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon Hoser Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Another piece of over-designed shite from Puma. I couldn't be bothered to get worked up and rage over it, since I never intend to buy another shirt during the Ashley-Wonga era. Fuck it, they've killed all my enthusiasm for this club. http://i.imgur.com/7dN9Z.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ally Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Fucking blue bits to go with the Wonga logo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Have I made this up but was it not made a thing that clubs cannot have striped backs? The shirts need to be one colour on the back to assist with reading player numbers/names? The back would be slightly better if the bottom part was black rather than blue. I sort of like the front, I guess all of the blue is to make the hideous Wonga logo blend a bit. Absolutely terrible that we're now advertising a company with their old logo though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 http://i.imgur.com/Z9VDQdP.png I like this bit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Have I made this up but was it not made a thing that clubs cannot have striped backs? The shirts need to be one colour on the back to assist with reading player numbers/names? Nope, it's not a thing. Southampton don't, sunderland don't. West Brom have never had it whilst they've had their thick normal stripes. We're the only ones who seem to insist on it for some reason. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Have I made this up but was it not made a thing that clubs cannot have striped backs? The shirts need to be one colour on the back to assist with reading player numbers/names? Nope, it's not a thing. Southampton don't, sunderland don't. West Brom have never had it whilst they've had their thick normal stripes. We're the only ones who seem to insist on it for some reason. What about the premier league numbers/letters? Are they only allowed to be black now? When West Brom had their stripes, they used red letters/numbers. Obviously black would be impossible on any newcastle kit, red would probably look ridiculous too Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Have I made this up but was it not made a thing that clubs cannot have striped backs? The shirts need to be one colour on the back to assist with reading player numbers/names? Nope, it's not a thing. Southampton don't, sunderland don't. West Brom have never had it whilst they've had their thick normal stripes. We're the only ones who seem to insist on it for some reason. These images show that the variations in colours dont make it difficult or any more difficult to read. Stoke http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/12/12/article-2073311-0F2416D100000578-813_468x286.jpg West Brom http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02389/Peter_Odemwingie_2389482b.jpg Aye, its pretty much just us... fat Mick probably thinks its a way to force fans to get names and/or numbers on instead of having a plain back to the shirt. I don't even think its a puma/manufacturer thing, as we had the same sort of blank back panel in the last few years with Adidas too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Have I made this up but was it not made a thing that clubs cannot have striped backs? The shirts need to be one colour on the back to assist with reading player numbers/names? Nope, it's not a thing. Southampton don't, sunderland don't. West Brom have never had it whilst they've had their thick normal stripes. We're the only ones who seem to insist on it for some reason. What about the premier league numbers/letters? Are they only allowed to be black now? When West Brom had their stripes, they used red letters/numbers. Obviously black would be impossible on any newcastle kit, red would probably look ridiculous too We used to have red numbers before the PL, it was fine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Red would be traditional, we've had nice blue numbers in the past too. http://www.thegelderdend.com/images/woody4.JPG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 Have I made this up but was it not made a thing that clubs cannot have striped backs? The shirts need to be one colour on the back to assist with reading player numbers/names? Nope, it's not a thing. Southampton don't, sunderland don't. West Brom have never had it whilst they've had their thick normal stripes. We're the only ones who seem to insist on it for some reason. What about the premier league numbers/letters? Are they only allowed to be black now? When West Brom had their stripes, they used red letters/numbers. Obviously black would be impossible on any newcastle kit, red would probably look ridiculous too We used to have red numbers before the PL, it was fine. Aye... http://www.nufc.com/images/kelly-nufc.jpg Note there is a white panel behind those, though only big enough for the numbers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tsunami Posted May 19, 2015 Share Posted May 19, 2015 The back is absolutely awful. Stripes please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now