Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Stupid old b******. How can he in one breath say England and the US lost the World Cup and then in another say it was already to give the World Cups to Russia and Qatar?

 

What are the realistic chances of Russia and/or Qatar losing their respective tournaments? Slim to none?

I hope teams refuse to play in them if they go ahead

 

Doubt that's going to happen, and fans will still be going to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid old b******. How can he in one breath say England and the US lost the World Cup and then in another say it was already to give the World Cups to Russia and Qatar?

 

What are the realistic chances of Russia and/or Qatar losing their respective tournaments? Slim to none?

I hope teams refuse to play in them if they go ahead

See, I like this attitude that there has to be some kind of stand made against them but the world cup is the best thing about football so I'd be pretty pissed off if there was no real world cup for 12 years

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stupid old b******. How can he in one breath say England and the US lost the World Cup and then in another say it was already to give the World Cups to Russia and Qatar?

 

What are the realistic chances of Russia and/or Qatar losing their respective tournaments? Slim to none?

I hope teams refuse to play in them if they go ahead

See, I like this attitude that there has to be some kind of stand made against them but the world cup is the best thing about football so I'd be pretty pissed off if there was no real world cup for 12 years

 

The major clubs would just put on an unofficial tournament in its place. Too much money to be lost (both inside and outside the game) to be having nothing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

Say what ye like about FIFA but Havelange and Blatter helped turn football into the undisputed global game. If the English were still running it we'd probably be letting 1 token African country into the World Cup and calling it a day. For reference see; the f***ing ICC.

 

It has always been a global game. What them cunts have done is turn it into a corrupt game where the likes of Qatar get to host a World Cup. Meanwhile the Premier League, ran by the English, is the runaway success of modern football...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Say what ye like about FIFA but Havelange and Blatter helped turn football into the undisputed global game. If the English were still running it we'd probably be letting 1 token African country into the World Cup and calling it a day. For reference see; the f***ing ICC.

 

It has always been a global game. What them cunts have done is turn it into a corrupt game where the likes of Qatar get to host a World Cup. Meanwhile the Premier League, ran by the English, is the runaway success of modern football...

Before Havelange there was only one spot in the "World Cup" for Africa and Asia combined

Link to post
Share on other sites

England, India and Australia have all done their utmost to keep cricket as a shitty minority colonial sport.

This is total nonsense as is your assertion about the English running the game - and also, in cricket, there is TV examination of disputed calls, something which your corrupt heroes in FIFA have done everything to try to avoid - have you been reading the Grauniad guide to Political Correctness..!?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Say what ye like about FIFA but Havelange and Blatter helped turn football into the undisputed global game. If the English were still running it we'd probably be letting 1 token African country into the World Cup and calling it a day. For reference see; the f***ing ICC.

 

It has always been a global game. What them c***s have done is turn it into a corrupt game where the likes of Qatar get to host a World Cup. Meanwhile the Premier League, ran by the English, is the runaway success of modern football...

Before Havelange there was only one spot in the "World Cup" for Africa and Asia combined

Could this have been because their sides weren't good enough at that stage..? Many Third World countries have seen lots of money poured into their football development since the 70s because their economies were picking up due to mining etc and when that happens you get an improvement in standards...they were also able to appoint better coaches from Europe.

 

There was a time when England had never lost to Germany, and that only ended in 1968...people need to see past Leftist dogma before making decisions about things....

Link to post
Share on other sites

England, India and Australia have all done their utmost to keep cricket as a shitty minority colonial sport.

 

Cricket being a shitty and boring as fuck sport has done that. Nothing else.

 

Well that's a monumentally incorrect statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

England, India and Australia have all done their utmost to keep cricket as a shitty minority colonial sport.

 

Cricket being a shitty and boring as fuck sport has done that. Nothing else.

 

Well that's a monumentally incorrect statement.

 

Kaizero sounds like a Colback fan with that statement right there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

England, India and Australia have all done their utmost to keep cricket as a shitty minority colonial sport.

 

Cricket being a shitty and boring as fuck sport has done that. Nothing else.

 

Well that's a monumentally incorrect statement.

 

Kaizero sounds like a Colback fan with that statement right there.

 

Ask anyone living outside the colonial countries what they think of cricket.

Link to post
Share on other sites

England, India and Australia have all done their utmost to keep cricket as a shitty minority colonial sport.

This is total nonsense as is your assertion about the English running the game - and also, in cricket, there is TV examination of disputed calls, something which your corrupt heroes in FIFA have done everything to try to avoid - have you been reading the Grauniad guide to Political Correctness..!?

 

:lol: For a start, cricket only allows 10 countries to play the full version of the sport, possibly one of the most ridiculous restrictions in any sport anywhere in the world. Then for the World Cup, a tournament by its very nature should least make an attempt to be inclusive and give the game to a greater audience, they've pulled the drawbridge up for associate nations meaning there'll probably not be any of them at the next competition. Last year the big 3 countries literally changed the voting system within the ICC to give themselves more power than everybody else, and made sure to secure that 62% of all revenue will go directly to those 3 countries. Cricket is a sport that revels in its colonial past and the fact that its a sport played by only a handful of countries. And that's why it'll always remain a joke compared to football which has expanded and grown continually since its beginnings.

 

Video refereeing in football would be absolutely dreadful. Evidence: rugby being fucking unwatchable, stop-start bollocks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

England, India and Australia have all done their utmost to keep cricket as a shitty minority colonial sport.

This is total nonsense as is your assertion about the English running the game - and also, in cricket, there is TV examination of disputed calls, something which your corrupt heroes in FIFA have done everything to try to avoid - have you been reading the Grauniad guide to Political Correctness..!?

 

:lol: For a start, cricket only allows 10 countries to play the full version of the sport, possibly one of the most ridiculous restrictions in any sport anywhere in the world. Then for the World Cup, a tournament by its very nature should least make an attempt to be inclusive and give the game to a greater audience, they've pulled the drawbridge up for associate nations meaning there'll probably not be any of them at the next competition. Last year the big 3 countries literally changed the voting system within the ICC to give themselves more power than everybody else, and made sure to secure that 62% of all revenue will go directly to those 3 countries. Cricket is a sport that revels in its colonial past and the fact that its a sport played by only a handful of countries. And that's why it'll always remain a joke compared to football which has expanded and grown continually since its beginnings.

 

Video refereeing in football would be absolutely dreadful. Evidence: rugby being f***ing unwatchable, stop-start bollocks.

I thought answering this post but then I realized it would be a waste of my time...you are clearly beyond help and should apply for a job with the Iranian propaganda Ministry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...