U2 Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Lee Ryder saying PSV's clause is nowhere near to what is being advertised. Much lower. Starting to really like Ryder's twitter usage Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 £4.2m would be a 17% sell on clause, which seems quite unusual. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 £4.2m would be a 17% sell on clause, which seems quite unusual. Sounds like bollocks to me, gonna believe Ryder on this one Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Any percentage clause is always based on profit and I can't see us give a 42% clause. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 £4.2m would be a 17% sell on clause, which seems quite unusual. Could be 40% of profit which is £4,2m if all figures reported are correct. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odear Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 The fee is actually 32.5m after add ons. The dippers have to pay 5m to PSV for the sell on clause and 25m to us up front. Another 2.5 after appearances etc.. Excellent business. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 The fee is actually 32.5m after add ons. The dippers have to pay 5m to PSV for the sell on clause and 25m to us up front. Another 2.5 after appearances etc.. Excellent business. Where you reading this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Great deal. Hes completely gutless and most of us want rid. Selling a player like that for this kind of money in the Championship is good business. Now spend it on 2 or 3 more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 The fee is actually 32.5m after add ons. The dippers have to pay 5m to PSV for the sell on clause and 25m to us up front. Another 2.5 after appearances etc.. Excellent business. If true that's unbelievable business from us. Are those figures gospel? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 £4.2m would be a 17% sell on clause, which seems quite unusual. Sounds like bollocks to me, gonna believe Ryder on this one " Lee Ryder Licks This " Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 He wanted to leave and we are getting decent money out of it so not too disappointed even though I think if he stayed Rafa could have gotten more out of him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John P Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Lee Ryder saying PSV's clause is nowhere near to what is being advertised. Much lower. Fuck, looks like PSV get 100% of the fee then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 So can anyone name the good matches he played for us on the top of their head? Trying to explain to an poolbuddy of mine we are close to glad to rid of him, he is just laughing at me. Norwich, Man Utd draw, Spurs last day of the season but I wouldn't count that, Liverpool win, Chelsea draw, West Ham win, probably a few more. He played well in quite a few matches, the problem is when he doesn't play well it's like having a ghost playing Arsenal away too. Fully agree, a bad game for him is the Ghost act. Like playing with 10 men. Won't see him defensively or offensively. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Southampton at home, West Brom and West Ham at home. Basically whenever we played well, he was good. If we didn't, he wasn't the type of player who could grab a game by the scruff of its neck. He won't need to at Liverpool, I think he'll show what we could have had. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Still not sure exactly how Liverpool will use him, with all the attacking midfield players they have. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Still not sure exactly how Liverpool will use him, with all the attacking midfield players they have. Few Liverpool fans seem to think he'll be playing as a CM to replace Allen and play alongside Henderson or Can, which seems a bit mad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Still not sure exactly how Liverpool will use him, with all the attacking midfield players they have. Few Liverpool fans seem to think he'll be playing as a CM to replace Allen and play alongside Henderson or Can, which seems a bit mad I think that's possible if they believe Can and Henderson can impose themselves enough. I think that's the reason we should have been playing a midfield 3, it's very forgiving of individual weaknesses. When I play I absolutely love it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Glad it looks to be sorted quickly. If Juve are interested in Momo then it might take a little longer if that hinges on Pogba. I think its clear they both want to leave and we will get decent money for both. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Glad it looks to be sorted quickly. If Juve are interested in Momo then it might take a little longer if that hinges on Pogba. I think its clear they both want to leave and we will get decent money for both. Moussa you mean. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
khay Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Glad it looks to be sorted quickly. If Juve are interested in Momo then it might take a little longer if that hinges on Pogba. I think its clear they both want to leave and we will get decent money for both. Moussa you mean. Its my nickname for him. I remember the other guy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ads Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Glad it looks to be sorted quickly. If Juve are interested in Momo then it might take a little longer if that hinges on Pogba. I think its clear they both want to leave and we will get decent money for both. Moussa you mean. Its my nickname for him. I remember the other guy. Why!?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritchie Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Thierry Henry was calling him it during the Euro's. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ads Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Thierry Henry was calling him it during the Euro's. The words of an awful pundit hold no weight in this argument. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubestationatmidnight Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Manure at home he was immense. Such a shame as several games he looked the best player to pull on the black and white for a decade but like people say the other games he was a ghost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted July 21, 2016 Share Posted July 21, 2016 Mohamed = "Momo" Moussa = NOT "Momo" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now