Ankles Bennett Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Mitro not so thick. He doesn't want to be sold so he gets himself banned for three games just before the transfer deadline. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Title change required like. Something of nowt and Lanzini dipping his head as he turns makes it look worse. Wasn't deemed a foul then and had MotD not mentioned it, it probably wouldn't have even been reviewed. Think it's a bit of a disgrace he got the ban to be honest. It may have been needless but it was hardly a fully fledged elbow or done with much (if any malice). Just standard bit of afters that most players will give but because he had a reputation he's been punished. This wouldn't have happened had it have been Kane or one of the top strikers. He will have been told to accept the fine and Rafa will have said you need to control the aggression and use it more wisely and that without being clever he is costing the squad. To completely take that aggression from his game render him useless (or more useless for some of you). He's third choice for me as a striker and based on West Ham, Joselu would be first. But it's early days. Overall I think top level football is just getting a bit of a joke tbh. Too poncey and sanitised. The passion is being sucked out of it. To me it's probably just the people who don't rate Mitro complaining cause they have a chance to rather than seeing it without bias. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Ban won't apply in France will it. I would swap him and Gayle for two new decent strikers. We would never get two in tmrw though. I think we will keep them both. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Banned for three games after the FA reviewed a decision that the referee saw and dealt with when it happened, completely against their own rules. Less than 24 hours after Mike Riley was on SSN explaining how they don't want to "re-referee" games. Superb. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 His offence deserved a 3 match ban tbf Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 It's very likely that the ref just thought it was a slightly late tackle or push and didn't see the elbow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PartizanFC Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Mitro haters Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Seems the Marseille link is genuine, they have ended interest in a striker from Benfica and are now targeting Mitro. Imagine we end tomorrow with both Gayle and Mitro leaving and no replacement in. ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Heron, surely you don't believe that pile of tripe you have posted? It was a stupid pointless elbow to the face that wasn't needed. No matter who had done it, it was just a thick thing to do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Banned for three games after the FA reviewed a decision that the referee saw and dealt with when it happened, completely against their own rules. Less than 24 hours after Mike Riley was on SSN explaining how they don't want to "re-referee" games. Superb. Is the only genuine complaint we can have. He's still an idiot and a liability, it deserved a ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heron Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Heron, surely you don't believe that pile of tripe you have posted? It was a stupid pointless elbow to the face that wasn't needed. No matter who had done it, it was just a thick thing to do. I didn't dispute that it was needless and a bit stupid. Just that it's also being made more than it was and that it probably goes on all game. It looks worse because Lanzini is turning otherwise it'd probably have been nowhere near his face and nowt would be being said. 10-15years ago he would never be getting the retrospective ban for me like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmymag Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Total liability and not worth the hassle. Get rid! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxfree Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Mitro haters Just ignore the plebs. http://www.themag.co.uk/assets/aleksander-mitrovic-goal-celebration-kissing-shirt-spurs-newcastle-united-nufc-650x400.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaydnNUFC Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Loan out Mitrovic, sell Gayle and not bring anyone in, wouldn't put it past Ashley tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 What the fuck, man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 If we loaned him out before the Swansea match, would his ban be activated when he returned? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 What's the fucking point of loans, we make a couple of million. Fuck off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Marseille can fuck off with a loan. They sell players to us who flop, we loan them back as they haven't got the cash to buy then after a year they pay much less than we bought the player off them for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Loan out Mitrovic, sell Gayle and not bring anyone in, wouldn't put it past Ashley tbh. We're not selling Gayle or letting mitro leave on loan. It's all smoke and mirror bullshit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 If we loaned him out before the Swansea match, would his ban be activated when he returned? Yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiston Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 He has nearly as many missed games due to bans than he does goals, he is nothing more than a liability. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiston Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Banned for three games after the FA reviewed a decision that the referee saw and dealt with when it happened, completely against their own rules. Less than 24 hours after Mike Riley was on SSN explaining how they don't want to "re-referee" games. Superb. Do we even know what the ref said about the incident ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigfella Posted August 30, 2017 Share Posted August 30, 2017 Banned for three games after the FA reviewed a decision that the referee saw and dealt with when it happened, completely against their own rules. Less than 24 hours after Mike Riley was on SSN explaining how they don't want to "re-referee" games. Superb. Is the only genuine complaint we can have. He's still an idiot and a liability, it deserved a ban. Wether we think Mitrovic is guilty or not is neither here nor there .They have clearly made up the rules as they go with this one. If this was happening to any of the top clubs there'd be absolute hell on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted August 31, 2017 Share Posted August 31, 2017 Banned for three games after the FA reviewed a decision that the referee saw and dealt with when it happened, completely against their own rules. Less than 24 hours after Mike Riley was on SSN explaining how they don't want to "re-referee" games. Superb. Do we even know what the ref said about the incident ? No, so figures talking BS as per usual unless he has 1st hand access to PL match reports by referees. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now